If I'm not mistaken, this is an idea you've been talking about for years, ever since market pegged assets came out. Your timing here seems to indicate that you're very bullish on BTS.

You need to think BIGGER, Pinky. 

this just make me recall the summer at 2014,
stan said we'll never saw such cheap BTS at this price(maybe 0.035 USD/BTS)
and toast said yes, it will surprise all of us if we know what happened behind the scene.

Quote from: Stan on May 04, 2017, 01:40:57 am

This is what Xeroc and I concluded waaaay back in March.

Quote from: Stan on March 19, 2017, 02:46:26 am

Actually, this is all I said (which is actually better than some of the incorrect inferences above.)

Quote from: Stan on March 16, 2017, 03:56:21 pm

...and its not even summer yet!

Indeed.  I'm consistently positive... bound to be right someday.

You're right!

I made a post about it, and I want many people to realize it as possible:

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@intelliguy/do-you-know-what-coinmarketcap-com-is-i-do-not-think-you-do-we-have-a-serious-problem

I'm tired of watching bad coins race to the top, and legitimate coins and assets fall...

We have an elephant in the room that most of us see. No one talks about it. We just seem to accept it.  I won't anymore.

Let me make you feel better.
Coinmarketcap has no relevance at all to the future of BitShares.
We don't need no stinkin' speculators.

Quote from: fluxer555 on May 03, 2017, 01:56:13 pm

He complains about coins that are "forked" or "premined", but bitshares falls into that category. Let's not forget our bitshares history, folks!

We made up the term "sharedrop", but all it really is is a gentleman's premine.

No, it's not.  People complain that our chain isn't private enough.  Everytime a Bitshares user makes (or receives) a transaction, you can observe it.  This is a lot different than most coins where they just have a garbled hash for a wallet address.

Bitshares wallets are easily identifiable and thus, auditable when a sharedrop occurred.  There was no foul play with Bitshares.

However other coins, like the ones where the developer releases buggy code, the chain starts, and 90% of the people can't get it to run correctly allows the developer to get his hands on a sizeable number of coins fraudulently, and then release working code an hour or two later.  This has happened multiple times.  If I remember correctly Dash / Darkcoin started this way back in the early days if you can read the original Darkcoin launch threads that have not been edited.

And that was the whole point of Protoshares (PTS).  You had to mine them and that gave you rights to our first upgrade to BTSX.  Subsequent upgrades brought those mined shares up to ownership of BitShares 2.0. 
Then AngelShares (AGS) gave everyone a 100 day chance to smartmine - donate to fund work instead of fake work (burning electricity).  How innovative was that?

If you insist on calling all that a "premine" then every single chain that has ever upgraded with a single hard fork will have to be called a premine too. 

Sharedrops are just adopting a previously fair distribution across a different demographic than geeks with gnarly CPUs.

https://steemit.com/eos/@dantheman/join-me-at-consensus-2017-for-the-eos-launch-party