1
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 源水(SPRING)BTS基金管理细则暨源水1号申购说明
« on: July 13, 2018, 11:51:48 pm »
对水滴资本和常春藤资本不了解。请提供一下他们的介绍及官网。以及他们对spring基金的官方公告及承诺。
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
110% forced cover is a feature, not a bug...
101%-105% max would clearly be nice.Hilarious That's a very clever analogy, no doubt it'll help our marketing team !I can't imagine trying to explain why we have two kinds of bitAssets that are the same thing but that are not compatible. It's impossible to market that.
We're used to it in America. We have two kinds of politicians that are the same thing but that are not compatible (when in view). It's actually very easy to market and is working quite well for TPTB.
what happens with bitUSD that are unaccessable due to lost keys?Ohhhh. So existing BitGold is not the same as BitGold 3.0?To clarify, BitAssets 3.0 might replace existing BitAssets eg BitGold with a new hard fork at some stage? Will BitAssets that currently exist be mapped straight into the 3.0 system?
from BM's friday comments on beyond bitcoin: BTA3.0 will coexist with the current system, but BM expects that the new system will be preferred. The old system will naturally wind down, and if it totally winds down it could be disabled with a hardfork.
Are delegates supposed to publish feeds for the old assets? What if they refuse and nobody can unwind at market prices? Are we sure this has been thought through compketely?
Same thing that happens to BitUSD that are held by someone as savings for ever. It requires someone to be short forever and will ultimately push up the price of BitUSD above $1 if there is no-one willing to short
上一篇是反驳交易引擎带动BTS价格下跌的观点。
但我发现标题又是在针对30天平仓期
最开始的规则是没有期限的,那时内盘BTS卖单价格都比时代高2-3个百分点,BTA购买力不足,大家疯狂short,并且高2-3个点在内盘买BTS。
那时也没人敢做承兑商。
后来BM改为30天必须平仓了,BTA有了强需求,咕噜敢做承兑商就是因为这个修改。
即便是30天平仓,当时很多人仍然抢着要short,人们经常抱怨我的机器人买单挡住他们short的单子了。
可见30天平仓并未打击大家的信心,信心是在价格一路下跌而丢失的。
我对30天平仓的看法是这个规则太僵硬了,不够灵活,导致行情冷清时空单买不到足够的BTA平仓,对以后BTA的应用需求也会是很大的制约,因此应该要制定一个更灵活的规则取代它。比如agile提出的每个月必须平仓部分保证自己的抵押超过2倍价值。还有我提出过可以每个月平10%,分期还款。
也许还有很多其它方案,原则就是第一要保证有足够的BTA供应支撑应用,第二要有BTA回收需求,限制BTA不被滥发。
The current BitAsset system will be run in parallel with the new system users can migrate at will.Interesting. Would the old system ever be completely phased out?
Probably once the shorts unwind and people stop using it.
谢谢
第2点美元持有者可以要求强制打折结算,具体细节可以在问问BM吗
美元持有者什么条件下可以要求强制打折结算,而空单又是什么条件下被强制结算的
如果都是无条件的,那么空单风险太大了,抵押的BTS时刻有可能被贱卖