31
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Bitshares E-sports Tournament [ANN]
« on: December 21, 2015, 12:50:42 am »Is this a cs tourney?
CSGO this time around yes, sorry for the lack of clarity
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
CSGO this time around yes, sorry for the lack of clarity
32
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Bitshares E-sports Tournament [ANN]
« on: December 20, 2015, 11:46:42 pm »How are you planning to promote/market this beyond the members of the bitshare community?
awesome question, the key marketing platforms we are using are:
Twitch
Gaming forums
Via sharebits:
we have a detailed marketing plan laid out which we are more than happy to share, we are working closely with @eagleeye in this regard,
perhaps he and @Freebieservers can shed more light.
33
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Bitshares E-sports Tournament [ANN]
« on: December 20, 2015, 09:29:27 pm »
The registration site and wallet system is nearly complete, we intend to open registration today via social media and various other means, we will keep the community updated as we proceed.
34
Freebie / Re: Maintainence on ShareBits
« on: December 15, 2015, 06:33:00 am »
all fixed, please follow up if theres any issues
35
Freebie / Re: ShareBits Announcement / Update Log
« on: December 11, 2015, 08:08:07 pm »
Had a stability issue as of 12/10/2015 with the datacenter, servers were on and off for the following 2 days,
we apologize deeply for not updating, both of us have been swamped with school/work and the bunkerchain project,
the service is stable again and this type of issue is extremely rare for server operations.
let us know if there are any bugs by making a followup topic in the freebie board, thanks!
we apologize deeply for not updating, both of us have been swamped with school/work and the bunkerchain project,
the service is stable again and this type of issue is extremely rare for server operations.
let us know if there are any bugs by making a followup topic in the freebie board, thanks!
36
General Discussion / Re: Open Beta: Testing the Sharebot All Week @ Noon (EST)!
« on: December 08, 2015, 11:25:15 pm »I tried several times to get a withdrawal code for this account, never received a PM though.
@kuro112 what should I do?
let us look into your issue, sorry for the problem, im sure its a minor glitch and will be resolved shortly, we had some emergency downtime today and it has been resolved.
37
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 03, 2015, 10:22:30 pm »Server Error in '/' Application.Is this ready for production pool? nonworking X11 and nonworking stats? http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=proctologic
the stats work perfectly fine? as for x11 id ask data anout that its not up to us to configure his unomp software
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.
Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customErrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
oh looking into that right now, my bad didnt notice that, it worked perfectly for me
fixed
38
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 03, 2015, 09:28:57 pm »Is this ready for production pool? nonworking X11 and nonworking stats? http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=proctologic
the stats work perfectly fine? as for x11 id ask data anout that its not up to us to configure his unomp software
39
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 03, 2015, 05:54:41 pm »ive been sitting on the sidelines here but feel it is important to recognize when there is an issue it is almost always BOTH SIDES at fault in some manner. And I take myself into account on this because i have to remind myself the same things when i have conflicts. it is one of the beautiful...yet complex aspects of being human. Still we all have to admit what is being done here in bitshares is code based...which takes time, user feedback and iterations...
please everyone lets just get back to working on this so this production seems less like lord of the flies.. :/
to those testing....THANK YOU for being productive and moving this forward while largely dodging the "monkey poo" ♡
well put man, for my part i apologize for derailing things, i commend the people ignoring it and testing the pool, giving feedback and allowing us to proceed with a much overdue launch.
thanks fuzzster
40
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 03, 2015, 03:47:41 pm »the proxypool software is ready to be installed and configured however bunker refuses to do it himself and is preventing its delivery for the community.
as we are software development contractors and not responsible for such things, i would look to bunker to solve these problems.
Item #5 on the terms of the contract which you have (committing another NDA infraction adding to the list) posted earlier, states that this feature would be implemented. That means to be put into effect and functioning. Only now have you started this narative of it being something we are responsible for installing and configuring despite over a month of chat logs and phone conversations that are contrary to this position. As well, the bottom line fact that the contract from the very beginning called on you (freebieserver) to complete this.
Actually, this narrative of it being something we have to do ourselves only began Tuesday (December 1st) where you restated everything was delivered a month ago that you claimed to "have proven that fact". I then took the positive approach and apologized, not knowing you had completed the proxy pool mining portion which had been the hold up previously, and asked if you could please send all the documentation necessary so we could input account info and start testing. It was only when I received the documentation that included this feature, did this story of 'setup yourself' start. This was shared at this update: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20350.msg262715.html#msg262715
We are here now in this public forum @kuro112 because whatever collateral I extended to you through my reputation and good faith despite the numerous excuses over the past three months that spanned blaming everything including your own team members @hybridd and @Freebieservers , has been spent.
I am not in the business of posting personal chat logs to forums. It is a serious breach of confidentiality and trust, particularly under a signed NDA agreement. So while you think you are manipulating public opinion by using edited snippets of chat logs, all you have really accomplished is destroying any trust anyone might put in ever talking to you again about anything. You have demonstrated through your own actions you cannot handle data responsibly. Regardless, what's done is done, and the consequences of such will continue for you.
I knew taking this measure would result in the monkey poop throwing palooza you seem to relish in when your contracts go undelivered. What matters most though is what I told you on December 1st.. execution. So if I had to get a little monkey poopie thrown at me so we can get you executing on the contract, sobeit. (cue an epic @Tuck Fheman meme)
I just want delivery for what the community paid for, and I am only excited about how much closer to that we have come in a few days. You would do well to be equally excited, and dig in to getting everything completed and in production. It would only help you.
Looking forward to seeing more progress today!
you can twist it however you want, but were only posting proof in response to your own violation of the NDA and breech of a contract we we handled professionally.
in the end, were the ones delivering this software and your just making excuses and lieing even more...
Quote
am not in the business of posting personal chat logs to forums. It is a serious breach of confidentiality and trust, particularly under a signed NDA agreement. So while you think you are manipulating public opinion by using edited snippets of chat logs, all you have really accomplished is destroying any trust anyone might put in ever talking to you again about anything. You have demonstrated through your own actions you cannot handle data responsibly. Regardless, what's done is done, and the consequences of such will continue for you.
I encourage any third party auditor to come check out the chat records on my (or his) skype so you can see nothing has been edited, this matter has escalated purely due to bunker breaching the NDA, lieing to his clients about us, and attempting to shift all blame for the failure here to us... its pathetic, step up and take responsibility for your lack of delivery!
we are here supporting and launching this software because for months now you keep refusing to and blaming us...
stop redirecting the blame and take responsibility, these miners are asking for your help to launch a product and your just pointing fingers! grow up and spend some time supporting them.
41
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 03, 2015, 01:04:52 pm »sorry let me just give the community an HONEST update as bunker has a serious problem with honesty:
As of now .. Bunker has gain way more trust and reputation than you.
So I'd recommend to revise you strategy with strangers, community members and
your clients.Quotewe will be making some visual changes tomorrow at bunkers request, but otherwiseDo you see how those two statements contradict each other?
the pool is production ready any time.
note: to those of you noticing a slowdown in hashing power, this may have to do
with us testing the password field for bitassets, we will update.
What has happend with proxy mining?
the pool is production ready, the bitasset change was at the request of users here or did you not read the thread?
as for the proxy mining situation, the contract specified we implement a software called proxypool,
the software is completely compatable and just waiting for bunker to set up an instance on his servers and plug in the pool.
as for our strategy, the trust we have is not in question, our work speaks for its self, we have not failed to deliver one product to date... including this one.
if you want to discuss bunker's trust in this community however, that could be its own thread, the guy is KNOWN for his lack of honesty and talking behind peoples backs...
I was only trying to give an honest update because so far none of the ones bunker is giving tells the truth or gives any real details to his miners,
its a bunch of useless doubletalk... he broke his own nda, continually lies about his product, refuses to put any time or energy into its release...
but i digress, theres no point in throwing around mud, the point of this thread is to get the miners up and running xeroc with honest information, not to assault peoples trust and reputation.
I will add that we have no reason to even be here posting on this topic, we are trying to provide support because bunker is too busy to do so, in addition to the many things we have done for bunker including but not limited to making his new website and front end for the pool, we still have no ill will for bunker, this endeavor or any of the users, i hope that much is obvious, but what should also be obvious by now to anyone is that if you attempt to BS, obfuscate the truth or tell users anything BUT the actual truth, you had better expect us to call you on it very publicly...
no we are not perfect either, we fuck up timelines, sometimes our software has bugs... we have blame here too, but were here supporting every product we launch.
sorry if my derailing offends anyone but we have gone far beyond the call to help this product launch already and to be accused like this despite many offers to take the blame and provide this support months ago, we really wanted to help you all but the NDA stoped us from doing so... we apologize, that much is completely our fault.
Quote
[11/22/2015 9:26:38 PM] Kuro: i was thinking we could give an update on your behalf and take the blame, we have been doing family stuff over the weekend but intend to launch first thing in the morning, we just need to sit down with you tomorrow morning and handle the small details during the launch
[11/22/2015 9:26:55 PM] Kuro: what time is good for you
[11/22/2015 9:27:25 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok.. I will be at the bunker 9:30am my time.. I have a LOT going on tomorrow though.. so I will only have some in between time
[11/22/2015 9:27:49 PM] Kuro: okay we will be on and launching around then
[11/22/2015 9:28:56 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok.. see u then
[11/22/2015 9:29:23 PM] Kuro: do you want us to post the update?
[11/22/2015 9:31:22 PM] Jonathan Bunker: no.. at this point there is nothing else other than getting it done that is going to be satisfying... lets get the payouts out and get the mining pool updated and get going.. then see what needs to be said at that point.
42
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 03, 2015, 12:13:29 pm »Quote
I reported on more issues with the pool and they have been fixed. If you look at the dashboard display now, you can make sense of the hash data now that it is separated by protocol.
Community here has been finding issues with the development pool and fixes are being done. Awesome.
Proxy pool implementation has been refused to be delivered now despite my inquiries on it's completion.
sorry let me just give the community an HONEST update as bunker has a serious problem with honesty:
The miners have suggested various visual changes that have nothing to do with the actual functionality,
and despite the breach of our contract we are continuing to support this service out of our good will.
other than visual changes, the pool software has not been modified since its delivery and no bugs found / fixed
the proxypool software is ready to be installed and configured however bunker refuses to do it himself and is preventing its delivery for the community.
as we are software development contractors and not responsible for such things, i would look to bunker to solve these problems.
we will be making some visual changes tomorrow at bunkers request, but otherwise the pool is production ready any time.
note: to those of you noticing a slowdown in hashing power, this may have to do with us testing the password field for bitassets, we will update.
43
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 02, 2015, 08:02:04 am »
Heres an actual quote of the scope of work:
all of the features requested are available and have been delivered for over a month, the delay has been that the client (bunker) is unwilling to learn and configure the system and expects us (the developers) to put this system online, pay all his users etc, hes still shifting the blame for everything to us saying this dev pool is not authorized...
this was on the 25th that he explained the pool wouldn't be changing, ever since we have been waiting for him to configure the software and put it online for his users.
its obvious this system is completely production ready and his attempts to divert attention away from the live stats showing him mining for a month are pretty stupid...
To make one thing clear regarding the 'security flaws' bunker found,
that being said, as of now that page is also password protected despite not needing to be.
for the record, week ago i offered to come on and post on his behalf explaining the delays... he decided to keep you in the dark:
he keeps saying 'get it done'
its obvious that he is unwilling to do so, as all the features in the scope are met and users here want there pool its now up to us to launch the product for him...
this is an unreasonable position as we are contractors and should not be providing this support nor be held responsible for these delays,
please look to bunker to get you guys set up... tell the guy to come on and spend 2-3 hours working with this community instead of making big posts about how things need to get done...
the only reason you didnt get paid and havent been mining for over 2~ months is bunker himself.
Quote
Enable capability to mine multipools like NiceHash
Implement upstream pool proxy mining to smooth profitability for high-difficulty coins (litecoin, doge, dash, bitcoin) (https://github.com/Stratehm/stratum-proxy, https://github.com/dogestreet/proxypool)
Ready to implement stratum port DDoS protection - ie. Incapsula (https://www.incapsula.com/ddos/)
Have the website translated to other languages to attract miners from other countries (Manderin, Hindi, Spanish, Russian)
Nice Charts (highcharts) of Pool Hash Algo
Miner Payout Lookups
Miner Real Time Hash Rate stats along with estimated daily payouts
Establish a high and stable history of payouts on multipool.us and coinking.io
Enable BTS address mining using username or public_key
Automated Payouts - Payouts are done once a day now manually in bitUSD. All funds now are mined and automatically sent to exchanges where they are auto traded to BTC. From BTC we then go to metaexchange.info or blocktrades.us to get the price for BTC/bitUSD at current market price, and then send that amount out from our delegate balance.
all of the features requested are available and have been delivered for over a month, the delay has been that the client (bunker) is unwilling to learn and configure the system and expects us (the developers) to put this system online, pay all his users etc, hes still shifting the blame for everything to us saying this dev pool is not authorized...
Quote
[11/23/2015 11:01:57 AM]
Kuro: hey reactivating this group as its realvent to all of us
[11/23/2015 11:01:59 AM] Kuro: anoncoin cannabiscoin digitalcoin litecoin myriadcoin potcoin saffroncoin startcoin uro worldcoin
auroracoin dash fractalcoin megacoin novacoin quatloo smartcoin syscoin viacoin
[11/23/2015 11:02:06 AM] Kuro: please make sure you have wallets for each of these ready
[11/23/2015 11:02:14 AM] Kuro: and if you didnt before, give us the new wallet addy
[11/23/2015 11:02:19 AM] Kuro: (cryptsy)
[11/23/2015 11:02:41 AM] Kuro: from one glance i can tell you were for sure missing a few
[11/23/2015 11:03:56 AM] Kuro: once we have the payout system configured for the new coins ill swap unomp for the current install
[11/23/2015 11:04:10 AM] Kuro: then all thats left is to point your dns to the new front end
[11/23/2015 11:04:14 AM] Kuro: and run the payouts
[11/23/2015 11:06:10 AM] Kuro: let us know when you have the new wallets ready please and thanks
[11/23/2015 5:58:13 PM] Jonathan Bunker: I will have all the wallets verified tomorrow
[11/24/2015 9:14:53 PM] hybridd: Cryptsy is/has been being DDoSed for the last little while, so there might be some down time / delay on the payments occuring.
[11/25/2015 2:17:09 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok
[11/25/2015 2:17:12 PM] Jonathan Bunker: so we are not going to move the wallets
[11/25/2015 2:17:15 PM] Jonathan Bunker: we are going to leave them where the yare
[11/25/2015 2:17:23 PM] Jonathan Bunker: all the wallets have been worked on
[11/25/2015 2:17:27 PM] Jonathan Bunker: and are working
[11/25/2015 2:17:56 PM] Jonathan Bunker: lets see if we can get this working tonight
this was on the 25th that he explained the pool wouldn't be changing, ever since we have been waiting for him to configure the software and put it online for his users.
its obvious this system is completely production ready and his attempts to divert attention away from the live stats showing him mining for a month are pretty stupid...
To make one thing clear regarding the 'security flaws' bunker found,
Quote
[12/1/2015 7:00:03 PM] Jonathan Bunker: Seriously great way for us to get hacked
[12/1/2015 7:00:05 PM] hybridd: all your rpcs are localhost bound they reject external connection
[12/1/2015 7:00:13 PM] hybridd: there's no way to get hacked lol
[12/1/2015 7:00:36 PM] hybridd: not to mention funds are constantly being moved off the RPCs to cryptsty, if there is a breach of security the loss is inisignificant
[12/1/2015 7:01:14 PM] hybridd: If you want added security, I can add basic http auth to that page so it requires a user/pw to see.
[12/1/2015 7:01:22 PM] hybridd: but it's not nessesary.
[12/1/2015 7:01:42 PM] Jonathan Bunker: What if wallets take a public address to be on remote systems
[12/1/2015 7:02:03 PM] hybridd: what do you mean?
[12/1/2015 7:02:12 PM] hybridd: do you want to jump on a call, I think it'd be easier to discuss verbably
[12/1/2015 7:02:41 PM] Jonathan Bunker: We want wallets to not be on the same physical machine as the mining pool
[12/1/2015 7:03:12 PM] hybridd: that's fine, the way Bunker.Transfer moves the funds is by SSHing to the machine that the wallets are on
[12/1/2015 7:03:28 PM] hybridd: So even if it's on a different machine, that's no problem and doesnt' change the way our system works
[12/1/2015 7:04:15 PM] Jonathan Bunker: Pass protect that page is necessary at least to satisfy perceptions of security of the pool
[12/1/2015 7:04:27 PM] hybridd: Alright, no problem I will get that added tonight.
[12/1/2015 7:05:11 PM] hybridd: That page isn't mentioned anywhere publicly, so only with fusking would the url be found, so it is fine for now, but I will get a password added asap.
that being said, as of now that page is also password protected despite not needing to be.
for the record, week ago i offered to come on and post on his behalf explaining the delays... he decided to keep you in the dark:
Quote
[11/22/2015 9:26:38 PM] Kuro: i was thinking we could give an update on your behalf and take the blame, we have been doing family stuff over the weekend but intend to launch first thing in the morning, we just need to sit down with you tomorrow morning and handle the small details during the launch
[11/22/2015 9:26:55 PM] Kuro: what time is good for you
[11/22/2015 9:27:25 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok.. I will be at the bunker 9:30am my time.. I have a LOT going on tomorrow though.. so I will only have some inbetween time
[11/22/2015 9:27:49 PM] Kuro: okay we will be on and launching around then
[11/22/2015 9:28:56 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok.. see u then
[11/22/2015 9:29:23 PM] Kuro: do you want us to post the update?
[11/22/2015 9:31:22 PM] Jonathan Bunker: no.. at this point there is nothing else other than getting it done that is going to be satisfying... lets get the payouts out and get the mining pool updated and get going.. then see what needs to be said at that point.
he keeps saying 'get it done'
its obvious that he is unwilling to do so, as all the features in the scope are met and users here want there pool its now up to us to launch the product for him...
this is an unreasonable position as we are contractors and should not be providing this support nor be held responsible for these delays,
please look to bunker to get you guys set up... tell the guy to come on and spend 2-3 hours working with this community instead of making big posts about how things need to get done...
the only reason you didnt get paid and havent been mining for over 2~ months is bunker himself.
44
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 02, 2015, 05:40:46 am »Are there higher difficulty ports?Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Scrypt stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
X11 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:5559
username oakmaster USD password x
Will have to talk to kuro about this (seem's he's been off for the night) I'm sure he'll reply in the morning, cheers. @kuro112
yeah i was taking a nap sorry, right now theres only one port for var diff, as explained in in geting started page:
Quote
A second VarDiff stratum port (4445) suitable for large GPU rigs and scrypt ASICs allows a range of 4096 to 32768.
update: edited the getting started page to reflect the correct info, will probably add more info about how the pool works later, thanks for the feedback!
45
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown
« on: December 02, 2015, 12:29:07 am »Just curious, why shut down the old pool until the new one is 100% up and running? I don't care if payouts are manual and once a week etc... just want my cards earning bts!
hey pal dont worry the new pool has been up for over a month, why dont you just try it out for yourself
http://216.146.143.200/dashboard/getstarted
