0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: xeroc on May 29, 2014, 03:40:01 pmQuote from: Amazon on May 29, 2014, 02:09:18 pmSometimes it is still hard to distinguish 1, l, |, I etc. Is it possible to have the format like JOHN-DEAN-3J4SorFLOWERS-563KTChecksum will help a lot. for checksum checkout recent NXT development .. they are now using Reed-Solomon encoded addresses ... this allowes to *correct* errors!!Considering the name looks up the key it could simply be: ${name}-${KEY[0...4]}
Quote from: Amazon on May 29, 2014, 02:09:18 pmSometimes it is still hard to distinguish 1, l, |, I etc. Is it possible to have the format like JOHN-DEAN-3J4SorFLOWERS-563KTChecksum will help a lot. for checksum checkout recent NXT development .. they are now using Reed-Solomon encoded addresses ... this allowes to *correct* errors!!
Sometimes it is still hard to distinguish 1, l, |, I etc. Is it possible to have the format like JOHN-DEAN-3J4SorFLOWERS-563KTChecksum will help a lot.
Considering the name looks up the key it could simply be: ${name}-${KEY[0...4]}
name is good.but I am worry about one thing.You must be very carefully, don't write a wrong alpha, or you maybe send money to a wrong guy.For bank service, you must write both the account and the name correct.
With names being used are there going to be any character limitations like symbols and punctuations?
We have figured out how to simplify the wallet down dramatically now that we have *named accounts*. Users will never have to see an address again unless they want to use 'advanced' mode.