0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Please remove your votes from my commitee member, I am stepping down since it is a potential conflict of interest, and I do not want to be in that position. The vote has been successful, that is all thst counts.
Quoteyou vote for commitee members on your account page in the voting tab.the commitee members make propsals to change stuff like fees etc... and vote on it.But where is the final voting? On blockchain? What was the result of this voting? Details, details, details!
you vote for commitee members on your account page in the voting tab.the commitee members make propsals to change stuff like fees etc... and vote on it.
I am not sure, whether this is good place to ask, but could you guys explain how this voting works? I guess you are doing that by the wallet? Could anyone explain to the community how things like this actually happen. Screenshots would be useful!
I don't like these decisions on the spot at all. These things should have been thought and discussed previously.
We will increase the fees today unless someone suggests otherwise.
get_object 1.10.5
I don't like these decisions on the spot at all. These things should have been thought and discussed previously. You can't through a plan for over a month and day one because some people register a lot of names you realize that maybe it wasn't a good plan after all and changing the fees like that on the spot.So until everyone can Vote with their stake for such decisions I don't think you should change things and keep them as is..I don't even know how much each name costs, what is premium name and which one no premium anymore since we keep changing our definition of things..
Quote from: mf-tzo on October 15, 2015, 01:54:50 pmI oppose to increase the fees at this point. You call these people spammers but they might have other business objectives that may bring value to bts.Have you thought that some people may want to register many names and then offer them in the future for free to new members attracting them to in the ecosystem by offering them their desired name? Don't just make a decision because someone says so. Bring Vote or something and vote based on stake and don't change anything just yet when most people haven't even started to use the new bts2.non-premium names have to include numbers or dots for example. so no, I don't think your argument has much value. unless your friends use all numbers in their nicks, and I guess than won't be a problem in the future
I oppose to increase the fees at this point. You call these people spammers but they might have other business objectives that may bring value to bts.Have you thought that some people may want to register many names and then offer them in the future for free to new members attracting them to in the ecosystem by offering them their desired name? Don't just make a decision because someone says so. Bring Vote or something and vote based on stake and don't change anything just yet when most people haven't even started to use the new bts2.
Mindflux now has both a witness and a committee member. Is this not frowned upon?
Dear community,we're still being attacked by people that run bots to create domain-like names on our blockchain, hoping to sell them one day.Quoteplaygame registered by btxlaomowww.playgame.com registered by btxlaomowww.lotte.com registered by btxlaomoacc.hulu registered by buycoinacc.pray registered by buycoin acc.jianguo registered by buycoinacc.creative registered by buycoin bts.yourporn registered by buycoin acc.yahoo registered by buycoin acc.tudou registered by buycoin acc.sony registered by buycoin It seems that over 3000 accounts were created since launch. BM has adjusted the creation fee to 5 BTS. Unfortunately after lifetime cashback, that equals a 1BTS fee, which is not enough to deterrent those spammers.Therefore, I propose to adjust the account creation fee to 95 BTS. This equals a net fee of 19 BTS after 80% cashback. Since the fee is still below 100 BTS, it will not vest for 90 days, thus causing no trouble for our public faucets.Please vote for my commitee member mindphlux. I will send a transaction at around 8PM GMT+2 to change the fee, if I get enough votes.Best regardsmindphlux
playgame registered by btxlaomowww.playgame.com registered by btxlaomowww.lotte.com registered by btxlaomoacc.hulu registered by buycoinacc.pray registered by buycoin acc.jianguo registered by buycoinacc.creative registered by buycoin bts.yourporn registered by buycoin acc.yahoo registered by buycoin acc.tudou registered by buycoin acc.sony registered by buycoin
Quote from: Tuck Fheman on October 15, 2015, 06:14:52 amQuote from: cube on October 15, 2015, 05:58:16 amI like to support this to make it harder for the squatters/spammers. I have a concern though. How does an average non-technical user claim back their vested fees from the webwallets?I believe this is correct, if I'm wrong I'll learn something ...Go to the + icon to create a new account, but once at that page select "Existing Accounts" and you will be back at the screen that lets you choose an account to claim funds to. This is where you can claim vested funds.Or you can go to Settings -> Wallets I guess? Don't have anyting vesting myself to test..
Quote from: cube on October 15, 2015, 05:58:16 amI like to support this to make it harder for the squatters/spammers. I have a concern though. How does an average non-technical user claim back their vested fees from the webwallets?I believe this is correct, if I'm wrong I'll learn something ...Go to the + icon to create a new account, but once at that page select "Existing Accounts" and you will be back at the screen that lets you choose an account to claim funds to. This is where you can claim vested funds.
I like to support this to make it harder for the squatters/spammers. I have a concern though. How does an average non-technical user claim back their vested fees from the webwallets?
I'm sure this feature can be added within a week by our frontend developers, it should not be a reason not to raise the account creation fee to combat the spam.Also note that each node and witness needs to keep ALL account names in RAM, so the spam is actually costing us more RAM. It might not be extreme yet, but imagine 1 million spam names would be alot of RAM that is consumed that would not be nescessary otherwise.