What else would you offer, except the server? What are your skills/how do you complement bitshares?Even though I've been in crypto for over 4 years now, getting active in a new project is always a change of pace and a learning experience. I definitely have to maintain the server and keep up with the software requirements. Do you have something particular in mind that you would have me do? Or are you also asking for my education? I have a Masters in Computer Science and plenty of certs to go with it.
What else would you offer, except the server? What are your skills/how do you complement bitshares?Even though I've been in crypto for over 4 years now, getting active in a new project is always a change of pace and a learning experience. I definitely have to maintain the server and keep up with the software requirements. Do you have something particular in mind that you would have me do? Or are you also asking for my education? I have a Masters in Computer Science and plenty of certs to go with it.
What else would you offer, except the server? What are your skills/how do you complement bitshares?Even though I've been in crypto for over 4 years now, getting active in a new project is always a change of pace and a learning experience. I definitely have to maintain the server and keep up with the software requirements. Do you have something particular in mind that you would have me do? Or are you also asking for my education? I have a Masters in Computer Science and plenty of certs to go with it.
I'm asking because since the last payment increase for witnesses, running a server is just not enough (in my opinion) to justify a vote.
sorry delegate.freedom RAM not 4GB,is 16GB, 36 months paid
备用服务器:128GB 32 Cores 1TSAS
+5%Thank you, you guys motivate me every day 8)
Powerful witness server, and glad to see the witness team injected fresh blood.
I'm a proxy, you have my vote!
Voting status will be updated in 16:00 ( UTC+8 ).
The latest update on my full node is 5-31-17 (tagged release by @abit ), the RAM usage is now over 17GB.
track-account = "1.2.1"
partial-operations = true
partial-operations = true
max-ops-per-account = 1000
track-account = "1.2.1"
partial-operations = true
The witness RAM requirements are now under 2GB RAM.[code]partial-operations = true
max-ops-per-account = 1000
Haven't stopped into the referral system so far. With your own faucet you become the default registrar/referer for account create/upgrade, if there's no LTM account (or enough funds?) present in the wallets that uses your node to interface with the blockchain?For the moment I have not switched to my own faucet. I use the OL's atm. Setting up a faucet is on my to do list.
Witnesses aside, If the above is true, couldn't we use committee or worker proposals as a temporal fix by choosing full nodes to be included in upcoming light-wallet and bitshares.org/wallet releases?I have already created an update to bitshares-ui on github for this. All new wallets should include the API access for my node. Some web wallets (OL) take only select updates and might not have it included.
Would that be incentive enough to run public full nodes and web wallets without running a business nor marketing, just the required infrastructure?There is no incentive for it. For now only gateways really need them. But we definitely need more to provide a better experience for the users.
July Witness Update
Witness performace:
(http://i68.tinypic.com/awc3tw.png)
As a reminder from @abit to reduce RAM usage for witness nodes, set these parameters in config.ini (since version 2.0.170531)Code: [Select]track-account = "1.2.1"
The witness RAM requirements are now under 2GB RAM.
partial-operations = true
Full Node:
(http://i66.tinypic.com/10hog8o.png)
The node was completely updated over the weekend. Additional parameters in config.ini (since version 2.0.170606) set to:Code: [Select][code]partial-operations = true
max-ops-per-account = 1000
In the Peerplays telegram channel few days ago JB mentioned that Poloniex complained about the memory usage on their BitShares Full Node. I am not sure if this continues to be an issue (I would think that they should be able to afford a decent server to run BTS) but once again they are displaying their " BTS is currently under maintenance or experiencing wallet/network issues. Deposits and withdrawals will remain disabled until a solution is found, which may require an update from the BTS team. Any updates must be tested and audited before enabling." banner. As you can see from my snapshot above the Full Node runs at about 27.4GB RAM. As we continue to grow and with the latest mods to decrease the memory usage on witnesses, the Full nodes will have to do the heavy lifting for the infrastructure.Haven't stopped into the referral system so far. With your own faucet you become the default registrar/referer for account create/upgrade, if there's no LTM account (or enough funds?) present in the wallets that uses your node to interface with the blockchain?For the moment I have not switched to my own faucet. I use the OL's atm. Setting up a faucet is on my to do list.Witnesses aside, If the above is true, couldn't we use committee or worker proposals as a temporal fix by choosing full nodes to be included in upcoming light-wallet and bitshares.org/wallet releases?I have already created an update to bitshares-ui on github for this. All new wallets should include the API access for my node. Some web wallets (OL) take only select updates and might not have it included.Would that be incentive enough to run public full nodes and web wallets without running a business nor marketing, just the required infrastructure?There is no incentive for it. For now only gateways really need them. But we definitely need more to provide a better experience for the users.
Last month there were no takers for my 1K BTS giveaway. So here is another chance:
Rules:
1. You have voted for my witness: sahkan-bitshares and kept your vote through at least 31 July 2017.
2. Giveaway runs through 31 JUL 2017
3. Be the FIRST to post below: "I'LL TAKE THE 1,000BTS!" and PM me your BTS account name.
4. I will send your BTS sometime during the first week of August.
5. If you are using a Proxy and the Proxy is voting on my witness you are eligible!
5. :) Good Luck!
Have a great BitShares July!
track-account = "1.2.20067"
partial-operations = true
Poloniex doesn't need to run a full node. They should run node with these values configured:Indeed, I added it at the end of the config.ini. But I want to run a full node on my wallet so I will just remove it.Code: [Select]track-account = "1.2.20067"
partial-operations = true
Then it will require around 2GB of RAM.
By the way, if you configured your node with "max-ops-per-account" correctly (then it won't be a "full node" any more), it should use around 4GB of RAM but not more than 20GB, so perhaps there is something wrong with your config file. Please note that the new parameters should be added above the first logging section, but not at the end of config.ini file.
Just a note, it's best to NOT produce blocks on a full node, for example, use it as a public API server in the same time, you may miss blocks when the API service load getting high, thus impact overall performance of the network. If you want to serve more, run another node and best on another VPS/hardware.Poloniex doesn't need to run a full node. They should run node with these values configured:Indeed, I added it at the end of the config.ini. But I want to run a full node on my wallet so I will just remove it.Code: [Select]track-account = "1.2.20067"
partial-operations = true
Then it will require around 2GB of RAM.
By the way, if you configured your node with "max-ops-per-account" correctly (then it won't be a "full node" any more), it should use around 4GB of RAM but not more than 20GB, so perhaps there is something wrong with your config file. Please note that the new parameters should be added above the first logging section, but not at the end of config.ini file.
I definitely agree. Mine are on two different dedicated servers.Just a note, it's best to NOT produce blocks on a full node, for example, use it as a public API server in the same time, you may miss blocks when the API service load getting high, thus impact overall performance of the network. If you want to serve more, run another node and best on another VPS/hardware.Poloniex doesn't need to run a full node. They should run node with these values configured:Indeed, I added it at the end of the config.ini. But I want to run a full node on my wallet so I will just remove it.Code: [Select]track-account = "1.2.20067"
partial-operations = true
Then it will require around 2GB of RAM.
By the way, if you configured your node with "max-ops-per-account" correctly (then it won't be a "full node" any more), it should use around 4GB of RAM but not more than 20GB, so perhaps there is something wrong with your config file. Please note that the new parameters should be added above the first logging section, but not at the end of config.ini file.
@sahkan could you check`? Regarding HEROWill get done corrected today if I'm off.
(https://i.imgur.com/oBMgryZ.png)
@fav I just checked and DEX is forcing the MCR at 200% based on majority, I will adjust today to reflect that.@sahkan could you check`? Regarding HEROWill get done corrected today if I'm off.
(https://i.imgur.com/oBMgryZ.png)
How did you set up your feeds for BitBTC? Curious as I am suggesting we create an official smartcoin for BitETH, etc...It uses BitcoinAverage and falls back on the exchanges if that API is not available.
How did you set up your feeds for BitBTC? Curious as I am suggesting we create an official smartcoin for BitETH, etc...It uses BitcoinAverage and falls back on the exchanges if that API is not available.
How did you set up your feeds for BitBTC? Curious as I am suggesting we create an official smartcoin for BitETH, etc...It uses BitcoinAverage and falls back on the exchanges if that API is not available.
Thanks. is there a "code" for this that is public amongst witnesses you can share? I'd like to tweak it and put out a proposal. Are other witnesses using a similar strategy, or can they use their own?
Hey,
Can you please update your HERTZ price feed to use a real USD price feed reference? bitUSD hasn't been accurate for months now, so your feeds whilst regularly published are about 40% off.
Cheers