Is it a bad idea to have some 100% delegates that short our low liquidity bitassets with their funds?....
PS at least until we hit a specific market-cap on the particular bitAssets and then fire the delegates... can we discus that?
Some options along those lines are...
1. BitGold delegates who build up BitGold reserves. These can be later burnt so building up BitGold may come at very little cost. They can also be used at a later date to fund projects or act as insurance that we'll be able to pay developer salaries in the event BTS falls low.
2. BitGold delegates who short at a huge yield rate. What yield would make you hold BitGold just for a few months? I imagine with a few thousand dollars yield we can really get the CAP up. (I know this isn't sustainable it's just a promotion to kickstart them.)
Other creative option -
- BitGold Dice, even a bit more creative like WheelofDoge, this gets the turnover up and also the CAP. (The reason centralised dice sites can run with the money is that people tend to keep their winnings on the site to gamble later, similarly if you get people into BitGold, people will keep some of ther winnings there so it will build the BitGold CAP.)
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/17980/my-experience-on-wheel-of-doge/If there was something similar maybe with a bit of a controversial/entertaining edge, it could get a lot of attention as well. (I.e On that wheel of fortune, a winning slice would have different images such as a Max Keiser Slice with a sound effect, whereas one of the losing slices might have a picture of Mark Karpeles etc.)