Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lil_jay890

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 80
361
General Discussion / Re: [Referral Program] Lower Socialist Taxes. Increase Capitalist Opportunities
« on: February 04, 2016, 07:41:46 pm »
If you charge no fee's who is going to produce blocks?  people are not going to do it for free.

Your description is actually making bitshares much more socialist.  The blockchain should be compensated for doing the work of producing blocks.  Your proposal expects the blockchain to do this for free.  Free doesn't work and bts will fail if this plan is implemented.

I have had objections to how reserve funds have been controlled and spent, but the ability for a blockchain to fund itself is uniqe and valuable.  Neutering Bitshare's ability to fund itself takes away a major invest-able advantage.

362
General Discussion / Re: Gold and Blockchain
« on: February 04, 2016, 04:36:44 pm »
Like JonnyBitcoin said, the problem with our bitBTC and bitGOLD is that all they are is derivatives based on a yahoo finance price feed.  That's why I like his bitcoin sidechain idea

363
General Discussion / Re: Have we lost another friend community
« on: January 31, 2016, 09:37:00 pm »
I'm not sure what you were expecting to read in an r/ethereum reddit thread... most seemed open to bitshares and didn't necessarily hate on bts.  Of course there is going to be ethereum biases in that thread.

364
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: January 31, 2016, 05:08:15 pm »
Quote from: clayop on January 31, 2016, 04:59:54 pm
[
There's no evidence that high fees accelerate Bitshares adoption too
[/quote]

Which is why changing the rules now will crush all the business's that are just getting ready to launch with the current form of BTS...

There may be no difference in adoption rates between lower or higher fee's,  but adoption will continue to be retarded when there are constant parameter and rule changes.

365
Technical Support / Re: Openedger/Chrome please fix mobile/desktop view
« on: January 31, 2016, 04:36:54 pm »
Quote from: 38PTSWarrior on January 31, 2016, 03:43:23 pm
This is what I see:


This must be the 'mobile view' or so. You cannot see the settings button and it's almost impossible to navigate.

What I need is the wohle caboodle, so that I can navigate to wallet management and make a backup. Otherwise I have to type that into the string in the browser (which is a big turn-off and not doable without l337 skill.

It should show as a standard for all mobile devices:


[emoji122]

Have you tried Ken's mobile wallet?

366
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: January 31, 2016, 02:06:06 pm »
Quote from: kenCode on January 31, 2016, 01:52:58 pm
I have no income, zero.
 
The mobile wallets will bring us referral income. This income is sorely needed to get the wallet past v1.0 and keep it bug free, constantly improving and ad-free. I have a family of four and my wife works 3 jobs, she is NOT happy that I have had no income for over a year. I have put my life blood, sweat and tears into this business and to have the only thing I have going yanked out from under me once again, well, I have to say this is it. Nuff said. Please enable micro-payments with near zero fees all the way up to large POS payments such as a Ferarri (charge a much higher fee of course) on a dynamic scale, but I would definitely cap it and use the Smartcoins as the % basis instead of the volatile BTS. @abit @jakub @xeroc @fav @BunkerChain Labs @chryspano and many others here know how important the network effect is, we need dynamic fees.
 
The Smartcoins POS for Odoo can bring us ALL an income. Dynamic fees are required here as well. Everything from 5 cent gumballs all the way up to houses and yachts and beyond.
 
Flat models don't scale, nature itself is dynamic, mimic nature and THRIVE.

It's important to realize people like ken have been developing businesses for bts using the current referral model as a key element in their design.  I don't think people her realize that businesses don't just pop up in a week.

I was just starting to develop a business as well, but now all of a sudden we are facing another drastic rule change. A rule change that effectively destroys any business that had been developing for the current version of bts.

Yes, everyone would love to pay extremely low fees.  But just because they want lower fees doesn't mean they won't pay slightly higher ones.  There is little real evidence to show high fees are slowing bitshares adoption.  On the other hand there is vast empirical evidence that shows rule and parameter changes are cutting bts off at the knees.

367
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: January 30, 2016, 02:38:39 pm »
Great... Let's cater bts to poor Chinese people... That will definitely help the market cap.

Bts should change its name to bitcharity. It's already a charity to cnx, why not add the nation of china while we are at it...

368
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: January 29, 2016, 10:06:52 pm »
Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 29, 2016, 09:45:41 pm
Quote from: 38PTSWarrior on January 29, 2016, 08:16:46 pm
He also wrote 'a idiot' instead of 'an idiot' :-D

You forgot to include punctuation at the end of your sentence.  ::)

Quote from: lil_jay890 link=topic=21202.msg275572#msg275572
lol.. you mad bro??
I am not mad, but I am annoyed that he can't understand written english and is wasting my time. This is pointless drivel, and you guys idiots are the reason that the Bitshares value is in the dumpster. Maybe if anyone listened to me once and a while around here Bitshares would be better off. You guys keep diluting with your unsuccesful attempts to spur liquidity on the DEX. Maybe when we are all in nursing homes the DEX will have liquidity (and actually be useful.)

I've read your posts about diluting for a while now... The idea was soooo bad I didn't think it deserved a response.  Plus you seem like the type of person who can't take any criticism, and just bitches and calls people idiots if you don't get your way.  Another reason I didn't respond.

If you think it's such a great idea go fork BTS.

369
General Discussion / Re: OPENPOS :: Smartcoins Point Of Sale (POS) & BitShares Wallet for Android/iPhone
« on: January 29, 2016, 09:55:19 pm »
Quote from: mf-tzo on January 29, 2016, 09:03:29 pm
@kenCode probably this has been answered already...Buying OPENPOS token is what? a donation to the project or there is a business plan whereby OpenPOS holders earn future revenue from the transactions? If there is a business plan can you elaborate more?
thanks

OPENPOS tokens are for the developement of a mobile wallet and integration of smartcoins in Odoo merchant terminals.  Odoo users will then be able to download the smartcoin app and start accepting smart coins.  Everytime Odoo does a smartcoin transaction, a 0.5% to 1% fee is charged.  50% of these fee's are used to buyback OPENPOS tokens.

370
General Discussion / Re: OPENPOS :: Smartcoins Point Of Sale (POS) & BitShares Wallet for Android/iPhone
« on: January 29, 2016, 08:21:31 pm »
Quote from: kenCode on January 29, 2016, 08:09:32 pm
We got the connection to Blocktrades working tonight so that now all POS systems can also accept Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, Dash and the other top cryptos. This weekend will be doing a lot of UI cleanup. Will get the eReceipts and QR codes going next week and begin the customer/shopper screens:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHOYG408ohg&list=PLjbx3qSmDe7RYkRMIEuFyYyG7_vvKgou0&index=6

Great job Ken.  I'm glad I'm invested in this project.

371
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: January 29, 2016, 08:10:02 pm »
Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 29, 2016, 04:54:39 pm
Quote from: jakub on January 29, 2016, 04:49:59 pm
Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 24, 2016, 05:38:32 pm
I am no longer investing in Bitshares as it looks to be a doomed project.

Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 29, 2016, 11:25:31 am
I do have stake. I guess you are too dumb to punch in the BTS account next to every post?

Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 29, 2016, 02:12:43 pm
I guess they don't teach reading comprehension where you are from.

Right. I do need some comprehension lessons.

You are a idiot man. Here is an english lesson for you. Learn the difference inbetween:
Investing: current or future tense
Invested: past tense

If I had said "I am no longer invested..." then you would be correct, but I didn't and instead you're just an idiot that doesn't understand English.

lol.. you mad bro??

372
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 29, 2016, 07:39:05 pm »
morpheus is our new Ander

373
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 29, 2016, 03:30:31 am »
Quote from: lil_jay890 on January 28, 2016, 10:19:30 pm
Quote from: Akado on January 28, 2016, 10:11:51 pm
Anyone knows this guy from twitter? https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/42sjjb/looks_like_an_altcoin_revival_just_nailed_3_big/

seems to have predicted ethereum and doge pumps and now he aims for BitShares

Question is... Should we sell on this rise?  Based on the shit going on with the committee I think we will have a great chance to rebuy sub 7.5 million

And its on its way! New question... will it stop at 7.5 million or are we going down to sub 7 or even 6...

374
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 28, 2016, 10:19:30 pm »
Quote from: Akado on January 28, 2016, 10:11:51 pm
Anyone knows this guy from twitter? https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/42sjjb/looks_like_an_altcoin_revival_just_nailed_3_big/

seems to have predicted ethereum and doge pumps and now he aims for BitShares

Question is... Should we sell on this rise?  Based on the shit going on with the committee I think we will have a great chance to rebuy sub 7.5 million

375
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: January 28, 2016, 03:33:54 pm »
Quote from: wallace on January 28, 2016, 03:32:27 pm
Quote from: Akado on January 28, 2016, 03:27:18 pm
Quote from: wallace on January 28, 2016, 03:20:53 pm

yes, because currently I do think lowering the fees is the right way to lead bitshares to success.

but why and how? this hasn't been explained. Business decisions made on assumptions while we already have people working for us because of the referral system and current fee structure.

Is it really worth it send OpenLedger and POS away just because of an assumption? What about other people? @JonnyBitcoin is working on his exchange, there are other projects that we might not be aware of.

We're just going to send them away, because of assumptions? No facts or proof? We're doing this when we've shown signs of growing? After just 2 months? What's happening is actually positive and you want to mess it all up just because of an assumption.

Wow, just wow.

I didn't get why lowering fees means send OL and jonny away?

Because it blows up the referral program

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 80

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 22 queries.