Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sy

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
46
BitShares PTS / Re: GetWork Miner 130 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« on: November 18, 2013, 10:38:58 am »
Quote from: hacko.bg on November 18, 2013, 10:28:44 am
I've tried for solo mine.
I'm managed to go through connection problems, but have a few nodes with dual Xeon 2450L (32 threads total) and I have a very low CPU usage - between 25 and 60%
I suppose the miner is not optimized for such CPU count, can anything be done on this?

Start it more than once...

47
General Discussion / Re: Transition from PTS to Bitshares
« on: November 18, 2013, 10:14:11 am »
But you will only own the PTS mined so far, right?

So it's taking a snapshot at release - or will future pts get credited too?

48
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Miner | PPS Mining Pool
« on: November 15, 2013, 12:50:40 pm »
Are you sure your miner is still doing hpm and not cpm? Because numbers are pretty close to my cpm with other mines and hpm would make yours alot faster...

49
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net + Custom high speed miner (up to 500% faster)
« on: November 15, 2013, 11:44:30 am »
Miner is still working fine, dont care about web  8)

50
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net + Custom high speed miner (up to 500% faster)
« on: November 15, 2013, 10:41:08 am »
Mining is working, web frontend...not so much.

Auto payout is set to 5 PTS, web will be available somewhere within 12-24h.

51
Keyhotee / Re: Introducing Keyhotee Video
« on: November 15, 2013, 10:39:50 am »
Interesting apporach, will most likely never get accepted by companies like amazon but still, interesting and huge potential - this or something based on it might be the next big thing in the next 5-10 years but gov will always fight this since they'll loose control.

I think this one will become something like TOR, some use it but not the majority...

52
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net + Custom high speed miner (up to 500% faster)
« on: November 15, 2013, 09:50:54 am »
Quote from: cabooseza on November 15, 2013, 09:31:39 am
Hey jh00

I didnt put any address in the payout address thing since i started mining PTS

My miners are connected and mining, will i still have previous balance and will it go to my ypool name?

Im kinda a horder so i collect then i put an address in to payout lol.

Guess that's what the guys who lost 100+btc on btc50 thought too - seriously WHY does anyone keep money in pools?

53
General Discussion / Re: Is there any timeline for all this?
« on: November 15, 2013, 07:30:17 am »
Roger that, thanks for the answer :)

Oh and dont rush anything, it's done when it's done - was just a bit shocked by the 2 years number but a few month - np.

54
Random Discussion / Re: WHY YOU CAN'T COMPETE WITH A BOTNET!!!
« on: November 15, 2013, 06:29:23 am »
Quote from: legitnick on November 14, 2013, 08:28:58 pm
Fuck ypool amirite? Looks like their pool is down again. We need a pool ran by ppl we can trust ie not Grom and others like rpool.

Back when ltc became "big" every pool was under frequent attack, that's just the way it is - what we need is ONE miner that can do failover to another pool...

55
Random Discussion / Re: WHY YOU CAN'T COMPETE WITH A BOTNET!!!
« on: November 15, 2013, 06:12:33 am »
OP you do realize that you mine the same amount of coin with or without a botnet...right?

It has NO effect on your payout.

56
General Discussion / Is there any timeline for all this?
« on: November 14, 2013, 04:11:08 pm »
I've heared that bitshares and co aren't launching before PTS is mined out, that will be in 2 years - true? Would be kinda long till then :D

57
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« on: November 14, 2013, 01:09:55 pm »
Blocktime is around 3-4 mins now so yes, pretty close.

58
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net + Custom high speed miner (up to 500% faster)
« on: November 14, 2013, 11:44:05 am »
Quote from: doesntmatter on November 14, 2013, 11:28:14 am
they are all supposedly independent.... but  Domain Name: YPOOL.NET
   Registrar: 1 & 1 INTERNET AG
   Whois Server: whois.schlund.info
   Referral URL: http://1and1.com
   Name Server: NS-DE.1AND1-DNS.BIZ
   Name Server: NS-DE.1AND1-DNS.COM
   Name Server: NS-DE.1AND1-DNS.DE
   Name Server: NS-DE.1AND1-DNS.ORG
   Status: ok
   Updated Date: 31-aug-2013
   Creation Date: 03-jul-2013
   Expiration Date: 03-jul-2014

strangly registered the day before keyhotee...hmmm
this is starting to sound familiar
anyone ever met any of these ppl .... any at all???

ypool isnt some new unknown pool, i highly doubt that they will vanish.

ypool has been around longer than most pts miners on this board...  ;D

59
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net + Custom high speed miner (up to 500% faster)
« on: November 14, 2013, 11:18:49 am »
They should finally settle on one miner and add multiple pool configurations :D

60
BitShares PTS / Re: [GUIDE] Mining on Amazon EC2 using Spot instances
« on: November 14, 2013, 11:17:41 am »
Quote from: joele on November 14, 2013, 10:30:48 am
Quote from: Sy on November 14, 2013, 09:15:39 am
Quote from: joele on November 14, 2013, 08:51:27 am
Quote from: gee on November 14, 2013, 07:38:56 am
Quote from: craggietx on November 14, 2013, 03:41:33 am
slicify.com has free servers!
Awesome I didn't know about them, thank you!

I tried slicify.com and everytime I found share always invalid share, reason : Share data time underflow.
Any idea how to fix this?

Yeah, set the time :D
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/NTP.html
Thanks but it won't allow me
14 Nov 13:29:07 ntpdate[4504]: bind() fails: Permission denied
and also when saving the cron file, Permission denied
Any idea?

sudo su
apt-get install ntp
then the ntp command from the link

but some of those slicify instances are odd, booked the i7 but that guy got no internet access configured or something, didnt bother to look much further ^^

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

Page created in 0.196 seconds with 23 queries.