Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Nothing to do with Play.
This is a new UIA on BitShares.
(But those of you with a high midi-chlorian count and the ability to read my recent posts closely might feel a small disturbance in the Force at this point.)
I have a business with one of the co-founders of Kraken. I was told under no circumstance will they work with us. Ever.
Harsh!
Dont get me wrong, I'm all for anti-big-gov.New Banx Update Video >> http://banxcapital.com/banx-update-6th-july-2015Banx in process of migrating to BitShares
Banx lotto new product release
BanxPlatinum release 30th July (Not sure what it is)
Presentation on what Banx is coming soon
Sounds really promising Mark! I am interested but unwilling to identify myself in order to purchase BanxShares.
How are you catering to potential-investors like me?
Can we get an "official" bitAsset that tracks the price of Banx?
Hi Permie
Just go to http://banx.io and buy shares from the market there mate.
and official bitassett will happen when we switch to 2.0
But wouldn't the autonomous purchase and trade of company stock AND/OR issuing a UIA to represent company stock be in violation of KYC and AML laws.
I am very interested in how this could work from a legal perspective. I also have some thoughts on this I shared here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17406.0.html
definitely an issue if done within the USSA. best to keep these p2p IPOs in friendlier jurisdictions until U.S. law catches up to the 21st century (maybe by the 23rd century).
So it seems that the current Bitshares 2.0 chain that is handling all the financial aspects is beyond brilliant, the code is beautiful, the functionality is going to be amazing. The only thing that it inherently cannot handle is micropayments. Combined with the recent licensing this creates a problem for people who love the technological capabilities of bitshares but who need to have low fees in order for their applications to work. So it got me thinking. Why doesn't cryptonomex just release a second chain that is fully geared towards micropayments and allow us to build our ecosystem out of there? It would seem that the work would not double, it would merely be changing a couple files in the codebase, (one of those files being the one where people are fiddling with the "fee dials" so to speak) and the devs could go ahead and keep a large chunk of the incoming fees to maintain the engine that makes this entire system work. From there, you can create full integration of trade between the micropayments channel and the BTS channel, and even make it so that you can charge high fees on the micropayments channel. Micropayments are a huge segment of what cryptocurrency is trying to accomplish. While I'm all for shrinking the scope of a project to focus and get more actual work done, I do think it would be short sighted to not bring this area of the industry into our own as there are so many markets that could open up for these services in the coming years. Could call it MicroBTS for the currency....
Idk, what do you guys think? Idea just came to me...it could be a good way to solve this issue.
I have been working on this with a few companies in that space, most are apprehensive to do it...but I think they will come around in the future.
Met with a few of them actually, and have been working to educate them on the new 2.0 structure.
me too. Hence why I am proposing the idea. I think it would be a long term benefit to this platform.
So it seems that the current Bitshares 2.0 chain that is handling all the financial aspects is beyond brilliant, the code is beautiful, the functionality is going to be amazing. The only thing that it inherently cannot handle is micropayments. Combined with the recent licensing this creates a problem for people who love the technological capabilities of bitshares but who need to have low fees in order for their applications to work. So it got me thinking. Why doesn't cryptonomex just release a second chain that is fully geared towards micropayments and allow us to build our ecosystem out of there? It would seem that the work would not double, it would merely be changing a couple files in the codebase, (one of those files being the one where people are fiddling with the "fee dials" so to speak) and the devs could go ahead and keep a large chunk of the incoming fees to maintain the engine that makes this entire system work. From there, you can create full integration of trade between the micropayments channel and the BTS channel, and even make it so that you can charge high fees on the micropayments channel. Micropayments are a huge segment of what cryptocurrency is trying to accomplish. While I'm all for shrinking the scope of a project to focus and get more actual work done, I do think it would be short sighted to not bring this area of the industry into our own as there are so many markets that could open up for these services in the coming years. Could call it MicroBTS for the currency....
Idk, what do you guys think? Idea just came to me...it could be a good way to solve this issue.
Silly rabbit!
It's a decentralized system. Anybody can jump on board. They don't need our permission.
