Quote from: cob on October 21, 2014, 06:49:10 pm

As of now the Music DAC is taking a wait and see approach. We have to develop the front end as well to bring value and use to the underlying asset. We have plenty of time to make a decision as to what we plug in to. BitShares Music or BitShares mega flagship.

We still have another 40 days of pre-sale at least + bytemaster's announcement to look forward to.
Then we have to consult the forums (:

A month is a long time in the BitShares world!

There are loads of people that are buying in pre-sale because they like very much the Music idea but they don't care about the  Bitshare mega Dac. Say I bought 10 $ worth of Notes  because the idea is so great, and I hope I will make 10x more    If  the acquisition happens and  now you want to give me 10$ worth of BTS( a different  example:  I bought 100000 Notes and now you give me 10000 BTS), this will be a very hard sell. So I suggest to consider very carefully and maybe not to wait until the end of pre-sale  to decide.

 

楼主你太傻了

Sorry guys my English is not very good,  use  translation tools.

I think only a certain variety of USD is better than USD, USD kind of too much results may be each one will unsucceed.
Can make  based I3 TOOLKIT' DACS independently, but run in the same block chain.Thus, USD can flow in different DAC

USD issuance powers are limited to BITSX, so USD was only one, keep the core competence of BTSX.

If a DAC is successful, there is a need for the increase of USD, enhance the BTSX value, the win-win situation, and a DAC is not successful is not on the whole ecosystem cause what effect. So all of these DACS based on TOOLKIT to form a powerful ecological circle. I do not know whether it is technically feasible?

For the already released DNS, it's very simple,we can get a point in time, the existing DNS address for the snapshot, and then re released a X chain based on the new DNS, address asset retention, re register ID (to prevent  X ID same name)

Through DNS, MUSIC, VOTE these have come out and coming out of the DACS, the BTSX BITSUSD popularized, the initial establishment of the DACS ecosystem I3.

So, later if someone wants to fork BTS, their USD will be very difficult to get market recognition, cannot  competition with the I3 DACS

If we do not have the same block chain, sooner or later I3  will still have independent DACS, face a variety of problems with USD, because X can not put all the functions, it will increase the risk of system. why don't we solve it now?

It can be understood as, BTSX is a parent company, other based design of 3I TOOLKIT' DACS is the subsidiary company ,delegates appointed by the company, they maintain the entire BTS, rather than a specific DAC.

The one chain and representative can use BTSX, or other better solutions.

So AGS and PTS scheme is also no change, at least without changing the rules too much, BTSX said to issue has caused a very bad influence on the market, especially in the initial stage of I3  development that now. I am a Chinese, my reaction to the market very intuitive feel, because many people here have BTSX.

Based on I3 TOOLKIT'DACS can mutually help each other more powerful, not the resource consumption in the competition,this is very regrettable.

Again,what I want to say is  use one USD---BTSXUSD.BTSX don't focus too many functions, the parent company mainly do banks and exchanges ,incude other DACS's main coin. ,So we can win-win situation whith other DACs.Who don't use X based USD, it will be difficult to achieve success.

The advantages outweigh the disadvantages,I think it is worth to do it.

一天一个想法，3I的诚信在哪里？规则就是规则，这样搞和原来的规则差别实在太大了！

I don't think it's a good idea

燃烧高点好啊 以后DNS涨价，收益也是不错的

   
    如果A公司把bitusd作为usd支付给B公司偿还欠款，B公司说我没收到，法律是不会保护A公司的，对于大型公司来说，更不可能做这种傻事，就算是银行之间这么操作也是不受法律保护，要想保护，只能立法，这在目前阶段不可能。而且商业公司之间这种bitusd支付如何开具发票如何纳税等一些企业事务都没有解决办法。
 

这个BM已经解决了，现在可以选择是否公开账号内的资产，如果企业要用BTSX，肯定是用NO TITAN，转账和余额什么的都是透明的！
 TITAN，NO  TITAN ，黑白通吃