Run out of disk space 
p2p.log too large.

Same here, p2p.log grows like 1Gb/h
have you tried setting log level from debug to info? I'll try it now.

Quote from: Ander on August 19, 2015, 09:55:11 pm

Quote from: speedy on August 19, 2015, 09:51:09 pm

-argentina-marketing.matt608: 369M for his 100% delegate. Its hopeless, they save more in toilet paper than BitUSD.
-marketing.methodx: 355M votes - didnt he get bored and move onto his other business interests?
-market.cn.group101: 613M votes - they are "evangelizing" in China. The member that proposed that delegate has a grand total of 8 posts https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,13226.0.html He obviously got elected and pissed off.

Are we all just too apathetic to fire people?

Also, do delegates have to reapply for their 100% positions in BTS 2.0, so we can finally trim some fat?

In 2.0 no workers will be making any BTS until we elect them to do a project.  So all of these delegates people are bitching about will be making 0 again unless they get re-elected to do something (and I expect people are not going to want to vote for marketing delegates, because the expectation is marketers can make money off referrals if they do well).

We're probably going to be seeing the core dev team proposals get elected and get BTS, and probably a few other dev projects, and not much else.  I expect inflation rate to drop some.

So... You see no use for them in a few months as they continue to underproduce now, yet you let them stay on collecting +4K BTS per day diluting your share and poisoning the Bitshares image? Sound logic there buddy.  Vote them out now and show people how the democracy works. Wait, I forgot the regular BTS holder has no voting power to do shit unless he spends money buying more BTS to outweigh the counter vote the Dev group controls. Have we really come so far from bitcoin where you have to spend money on mining equipment to get any say? Look at the collusion between the large mining farms over XT.

You are hilarious with your mental gymnastics.

newmine you speak as if you had not understood  DPOS and it's improvements over other stake based protocols, but I doubt you were still here if you don't really get it.

From a marketing perspective I wouldn't use brownie points to reward voters, or  to give them any other use at protocol level. They are kind of meaningless (not worthless) outside this forum, and very specific to a particular need.

From system perspective I think it would not be coherent because of it's issuance and distribution form.
Maybe another smart asset could play this role.

We are well aware that marketing delegates will become obsolete with BTS 2.0 referral system, until that we still have goals.

Please read our thread were we post our work done.

We run the biggest Bitshares meetup group and the Bitshares team always is present in the monthly Bitcoin meetups, where the Argentinian one is in the top ten worldwide. There we always do bitshares paperwallets giveaways with tri-folds and often talks about Bitshares, next one coming this Friday.

If you have any question and/or suggestion will be welcome in our thread.

Fixed link to  Bitshares Meetup group    =)

This brilliant team envisioned concepts and systems almost no one imegined two years ago. They already proved being capable to make it work, in spite of (or along with) a constant influx of disruptive/highly experimental features to add into the same protocol.
We also have this great community with lots of active, committed and enterprising members full of ideas and critics (let's stay with the positive ones, that are amazing).

Having this almost perfect combination of core team and community brings an extra challenge: to strongly agree on the scope for the product, find consensus on its base features and development process. I see critical at this point to find the sweet-spot between feature set and admissible time to release the stable product.

I'd rather spend a whole week (or even a month if needed) deciding which features are key for Bitshares 1.0 so devs and we all know exactly where to focus . Too many ideas lead us to a lack on focus. Don't let a small lack of coordination to debilitate us on this exceptional project.

As far as I've been reading last days, we are talking about: reducing dilution (rethinking the way to fund projects/delegate pay rate and to undo merger or delay vesting), referral system into protocol, Turing complete scripting, merging Bitshares MUSIC blockchain, BitAssets 3.0, Bond market, etc.

I think Bitshares nature is somehow marked to be constantly evolving. Even if we can make most of this features stable in 1.0 in a reasonable time to release the full protocol at once, I'm sure we will keep getting great ideas for new features and improvements that most of us will want to see in the protocol as soon as possible. Also lots of new features at once means a lot of possible points of failure.

My point is we already have an incredibly useful and competitive product, with just a few market design and code issues. I'd suggest just to fix those issues, add the minimal BitAssets 3.0 features needed to have a good market and focus just on that for 1.0 release.

Mean wile we could take devshares one step further, encourage adoption so we can test features involving social experiments and not just code (economic, market, social and marketing related features we have no way to evaluate viability without monetarily incentivated users), so we can keep bringing features to Bitshares  in a gradual and organized basis only after extensive real life testing.
That or any other solution that may bring certainty to adopters.

Remember stability is one of our first sell strengths!

Markets are not my field but at a first glance I'd like to se price feed capability on UIAs.
I think we shouldn't modify actual market issued assets (with delegate feeds) to keep things simple (or less scary) for normal users.

Also no active feeds. This never happened to Matt before as far as I know, he's probably very  busy with other  projects.

We should swap delegates sooner than expected.

wow. take my money and hard drives!