Based on the mining speed can we predict when AGS and PTS supply will be equal?
Is there any reason why 3rd Party developers would honor ASG less than PTS in the future?
The misunderstanding that AGS somehow belongs to Invictus could cause some developers to rationalize that they can skip honoring the owners of AGS. We think that would be a mistake.
Invictus is only a servant of AGS donors. A temporary agent trusted to build an ecosystem for everybody to live in. Once 100% of the donations have been used to build up the industry, infrastructure, toolkits, and even incubate other developers, Invictus will have done its duty and will become just another ordinary player with an obligation to honor AGS and PTS holders.
The product of that development and promotional effort belongs collectively to AGS holders, not Invictus. They can decide how they want to enforce their ownership rights as documented in the BitShares Social Consensus License. Perhaps peer pressure and market forces will be enough. Perhaps some will feel justified in cloning AGS-derived DACs that fail to honor the license into competing DACs that do. If so, it will be up to AGS and PTS holders to decide which pedigree of DACs they will support.
That, and only that, will determine the effectiveness of the AGS social contract.