0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: xeroc on March 27, 2016, 12:53:48 pmQuote from: svk on March 27, 2016, 06:27:50 amQuote from: tonyk on March 27, 2016, 04:39:11 amQuote from: SolomonSollarsNSense on March 27, 2016, 04:03:52 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 26, 2016, 11:05:05 amQuote from: Samupaha on March 26, 2016, 10:33:46 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 09:33:11 pmIf the worker doesn't get voted in I'll keep it and monetise it myself but it's obvious to most it would be better controlled by the comittee or cryptonomex. I don't think that committee members should be required to take any part in marketing. Their job is to set blockchain parameters and that's enough for a nonpaid work.Also Cryptonomex seems to be uninterested in marketing so accounts might be left underused if they are given to them.Right now the best option might be that you'll gather a group of people who are interested and can post relevant stuff every now and then. I use Facebook quite regularly so I can be admin there if needed.Maybe you could first ask donations to cover you expenses before you make the worker proposal? All donations you collect makes the worker less expensive so it gets voted in more easily.I agree xeroc or crytonomex wouldn't be good at or have the time for marketing.I'm saying it should be owned by cryptonomex or the committee, but key people who are good at marketing can post from the account so the news is fresh and varied. Yet if one person gets too spam happy the committee will be able to stop it.message me your facebook details and I'll add you so you can post. Also anyone else who would like to.Hello @JonnyBitcoin . This seems like perfect timing. We would love the New Money project to have access to the Bitshares accounts. Our project right now is gaining a lot of traction and it would be stellar for those accounts to be promoting a powered by Bitshares project thats actually working currently as we speak. Let me know what we have to do to make that happen. Thanks.For god sakes.... NO!You are really pushed me hard to post a (possibly last post of mine on this forum) in your thread.Agreed, please don't give third parties access to that account.That also includes ccedk and ol as well as cnx.bts.org aswell as the twitter handle cant take a position on partners!!Why not? The more related marketing, the better.
Quote from: svk on March 27, 2016, 06:27:50 amQuote from: tonyk on March 27, 2016, 04:39:11 amQuote from: SolomonSollarsNSense on March 27, 2016, 04:03:52 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 26, 2016, 11:05:05 amQuote from: Samupaha on March 26, 2016, 10:33:46 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 09:33:11 pmIf the worker doesn't get voted in I'll keep it and monetise it myself but it's obvious to most it would be better controlled by the comittee or cryptonomex. I don't think that committee members should be required to take any part in marketing. Their job is to set blockchain parameters and that's enough for a nonpaid work.Also Cryptonomex seems to be uninterested in marketing so accounts might be left underused if they are given to them.Right now the best option might be that you'll gather a group of people who are interested and can post relevant stuff every now and then. I use Facebook quite regularly so I can be admin there if needed.Maybe you could first ask donations to cover you expenses before you make the worker proposal? All donations you collect makes the worker less expensive so it gets voted in more easily.I agree xeroc or crytonomex wouldn't be good at or have the time for marketing.I'm saying it should be owned by cryptonomex or the committee, but key people who are good at marketing can post from the account so the news is fresh and varied. Yet if one person gets too spam happy the committee will be able to stop it.message me your facebook details and I'll add you so you can post. Also anyone else who would like to.Hello @JonnyBitcoin . This seems like perfect timing. We would love the New Money project to have access to the Bitshares accounts. Our project right now is gaining a lot of traction and it would be stellar for those accounts to be promoting a powered by Bitshares project thats actually working currently as we speak. Let me know what we have to do to make that happen. Thanks.For god sakes.... NO!You are really pushed me hard to post a (possibly last post of mine on this forum) in your thread.Agreed, please don't give third parties access to that account.That also includes ccedk and ol as well as cnx.bts.org aswell as the twitter handle cant take a position on partners!!
Quote from: tonyk on March 27, 2016, 04:39:11 amQuote from: SolomonSollarsNSense on March 27, 2016, 04:03:52 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 26, 2016, 11:05:05 amQuote from: Samupaha on March 26, 2016, 10:33:46 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 09:33:11 pmIf the worker doesn't get voted in I'll keep it and monetise it myself but it's obvious to most it would be better controlled by the comittee or cryptonomex. I don't think that committee members should be required to take any part in marketing. Their job is to set blockchain parameters and that's enough for a nonpaid work.Also Cryptonomex seems to be uninterested in marketing so accounts might be left underused if they are given to them.Right now the best option might be that you'll gather a group of people who are interested and can post relevant stuff every now and then. I use Facebook quite regularly so I can be admin there if needed.Maybe you could first ask donations to cover you expenses before you make the worker proposal? All donations you collect makes the worker less expensive so it gets voted in more easily.I agree xeroc or crytonomex wouldn't be good at or have the time for marketing.I'm saying it should be owned by cryptonomex or the committee, but key people who are good at marketing can post from the account so the news is fresh and varied. Yet if one person gets too spam happy the committee will be able to stop it.message me your facebook details and I'll add you so you can post. Also anyone else who would like to.Hello @JonnyBitcoin . This seems like perfect timing. We would love the New Money project to have access to the Bitshares accounts. Our project right now is gaining a lot of traction and it would be stellar for those accounts to be promoting a powered by Bitshares project thats actually working currently as we speak. Let me know what we have to do to make that happen. Thanks.For god sakes.... NO!You are really pushed me hard to post a (possibly last post of mine on this forum) in your thread.Agreed, please don't give third parties access to that account.
Quote from: SolomonSollarsNSense on March 27, 2016, 04:03:52 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 26, 2016, 11:05:05 amQuote from: Samupaha on March 26, 2016, 10:33:46 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 09:33:11 pmIf the worker doesn't get voted in I'll keep it and monetise it myself but it's obvious to most it would be better controlled by the comittee or cryptonomex. I don't think that committee members should be required to take any part in marketing. Their job is to set blockchain parameters and that's enough for a nonpaid work.Also Cryptonomex seems to be uninterested in marketing so accounts might be left underused if they are given to them.Right now the best option might be that you'll gather a group of people who are interested and can post relevant stuff every now and then. I use Facebook quite regularly so I can be admin there if needed.Maybe you could first ask donations to cover you expenses before you make the worker proposal? All donations you collect makes the worker less expensive so it gets voted in more easily.I agree xeroc or crytonomex wouldn't be good at or have the time for marketing.I'm saying it should be owned by cryptonomex or the committee, but key people who are good at marketing can post from the account so the news is fresh and varied. Yet if one person gets too spam happy the committee will be able to stop it.message me your facebook details and I'll add you so you can post. Also anyone else who would like to.Hello @JonnyBitcoin . This seems like perfect timing. We would love the New Money project to have access to the Bitshares accounts. Our project right now is gaining a lot of traction and it would be stellar for those accounts to be promoting a powered by Bitshares project thats actually working currently as we speak. Let me know what we have to do to make that happen. Thanks.For god sakes.... NO!You are really pushed me hard to post a (possibly last post of mine on this forum) in your thread.
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 26, 2016, 11:05:05 amQuote from: Samupaha on March 26, 2016, 10:33:46 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 09:33:11 pmIf the worker doesn't get voted in I'll keep it and monetise it myself but it's obvious to most it would be better controlled by the comittee or cryptonomex. I don't think that committee members should be required to take any part in marketing. Their job is to set blockchain parameters and that's enough for a nonpaid work.Also Cryptonomex seems to be uninterested in marketing so accounts might be left underused if they are given to them.Right now the best option might be that you'll gather a group of people who are interested and can post relevant stuff every now and then. I use Facebook quite regularly so I can be admin there if needed.Maybe you could first ask donations to cover you expenses before you make the worker proposal? All donations you collect makes the worker less expensive so it gets voted in more easily.I agree xeroc or crytonomex wouldn't be good at or have the time for marketing.I'm saying it should be owned by cryptonomex or the committee, but key people who are good at marketing can post from the account so the news is fresh and varied. Yet if one person gets too spam happy the committee will be able to stop it.message me your facebook details and I'll add you so you can post. Also anyone else who would like to.Hello @JonnyBitcoin . This seems like perfect timing. We would love the New Money project to have access to the Bitshares accounts. Our project right now is gaining a lot of traction and it would be stellar for those accounts to be promoting a powered by Bitshares project thats actually working currently as we speak. Let me know what we have to do to make that happen. Thanks.
Quote from: Samupaha on March 26, 2016, 10:33:46 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 09:33:11 pmIf the worker doesn't get voted in I'll keep it and monetise it myself but it's obvious to most it would be better controlled by the comittee or cryptonomex. I don't think that committee members should be required to take any part in marketing. Their job is to set blockchain parameters and that's enough for a nonpaid work.Also Cryptonomex seems to be uninterested in marketing so accounts might be left underused if they are given to them.Right now the best option might be that you'll gather a group of people who are interested and can post relevant stuff every now and then. I use Facebook quite regularly so I can be admin there if needed.Maybe you could first ask donations to cover you expenses before you make the worker proposal? All donations you collect makes the worker less expensive so it gets voted in more easily.I agree xeroc or crytonomex wouldn't be good at or have the time for marketing.I'm saying it should be owned by cryptonomex or the committee, but key people who are good at marketing can post from the account so the news is fresh and varied. Yet if one person gets too spam happy the committee will be able to stop it.message me your facebook details and I'll add you so you can post. Also anyone else who would like to.
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 09:33:11 pmIf the worker doesn't get voted in I'll keep it and monetise it myself but it's obvious to most it would be better controlled by the comittee or cryptonomex. I don't think that committee members should be required to take any part in marketing. Their job is to set blockchain parameters and that's enough for a nonpaid work.Also Cryptonomex seems to be uninterested in marketing so accounts might be left underused if they are given to them.Right now the best option might be that you'll gather a group of people who are interested and can post relevant stuff every now and then. I use Facebook quite regularly so I can be admin there if needed.Maybe you could first ask donations to cover you expenses before you make the worker proposal? All donations you collect makes the worker less expensive so it gets voted in more easily.
If the worker doesn't get voted in I'll keep it and monetise it myself but it's obvious to most it would be better controlled by the comittee or cryptonomex.
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 09:16:00 pmQuote from: Akado on March 24, 2016, 08:22:05 pmI don't think it's about the money but about the attitude. While some members might not agree with this and its their right, you claimed "... and expect the community to pay me back for them in full."It's about people not even be aware of this or not agreeing with this and then having you "demand" to be reimbursed. It feels unfair, hence the comment about a worker proposal of $10k to get the chinese app page. It gives the impression anyone can just do whatever they like and demand the community pays them back.if theres a worker proposal everyone votes. I expect that people will reimburse me. I could be wrong. just trying to be useful.I know. I believe you have good intentions, but you also must see from other people's pov.Imagine someone who doesn't agree with this decision and then comes to this thread and gets the idea you are demanding your money back. People will think "why should I pay him for something he did so spontaneously, without asking for my opinion? What if someone does the same with $50k?", etc.
Quote from: Akado on March 24, 2016, 08:22:05 pmI don't think it's about the money but about the attitude. While some members might not agree with this and its their right, you claimed "... and expect the community to pay me back for them in full."It's about people not even be aware of this or not agreeing with this and then having you "demand" to be reimbursed. It feels unfair, hence the comment about a worker proposal of $10k to get the chinese app page. It gives the impression anyone can just do whatever they like and demand the community pays them back.if theres a worker proposal everyone votes. I expect that people will reimburse me. I could be wrong. just trying to be useful.
I don't think it's about the money but about the attitude. While some members might not agree with this and its their right, you claimed "... and expect the community to pay me back for them in full."It's about people not even be aware of this or not agreeing with this and then having you "demand" to be reimbursed. It feels unfair, hence the comment about a worker proposal of $10k to get the chinese app page. It gives the impression anyone can just do whatever they like and demand the community pays them back.
You're doing it wrong.
Quote from: chamber on March 24, 2016, 11:17:00 pmBTW, I'm a newbie, what does the symbol mean or do? You're doing it wrong. You're supposed to type it like this ...#sharebits "chamber" 5 PERCENTIt's been a while but I believe it represents the 5% interest you used to get from bitUSD back in teh day.
BTW, I'm a newbie, what does the symbol mean or do?
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 24, 2016, 01:07:02 amQuote from: roadscape on March 21, 2016, 04:04:21 pmDoes Twitter allow there to be an account administrator in addition to a locked-down posting account? Or is one account always one login? If that's the case, this is not something that can be truly "owned" by the community in any way.IMO, ideally there is a marketer here that realizes that the potential value of owning @bitshares is greater than $3,000, and they pick it up. (CNX, CNI, CCEDK?) I think this asset could be more productive in private ownership.Alternatively: what if you keep the handle, and submit a worker that pays a smaller amount but over a longer period of time for managing the account, tweeting, building followers, etc. This would be a like a dividend on your investment. Just a thought.With the facebook page different "roles" can be allocated see here: https://www.facebook.com/help/289207354498410This means someone like @xeroc can hold the highest position which is admin and is basically the master key to the account.Then many other people in the community like myself can take the roles of Moderators and editors allowing many of us to contribute news etc but not have control.I believe there is a similar system for twitter where we could do the same. @roadscape could you please create a worker proposal for me to cover this $2800Roadscape my man , could you create a 10000 USD worker for me while you're at it . I just purchased bitshares account name on the most influential social platform in China which are really important for this community .
Quote from: roadscape on March 21, 2016, 04:04:21 pmDoes Twitter allow there to be an account administrator in addition to a locked-down posting account? Or is one account always one login? If that's the case, this is not something that can be truly "owned" by the community in any way.IMO, ideally there is a marketer here that realizes that the potential value of owning @bitshares is greater than $3,000, and they pick it up. (CNX, CNI, CCEDK?) I think this asset could be more productive in private ownership.Alternatively: what if you keep the handle, and submit a worker that pays a smaller amount but over a longer period of time for managing the account, tweeting, building followers, etc. This would be a like a dividend on your investment. Just a thought.With the facebook page different "roles" can be allocated see here: https://www.facebook.com/help/289207354498410This means someone like @xeroc can hold the highest position which is admin and is basically the master key to the account.Then many other people in the community like myself can take the roles of Moderators and editors allowing many of us to contribute news etc but not have control.I believe there is a similar system for twitter where we could do the same. @roadscape could you please create a worker proposal for me to cover this $2800
Does Twitter allow there to be an account administrator in addition to a locked-down posting account? Or is one account always one login? If that's the case, this is not something that can be truly "owned" by the community in any way.IMO, ideally there is a marketer here that realizes that the potential value of owning @bitshares is greater than $3,000, and they pick it up. (CNX, CNI, CCEDK?) I think this asset could be more productive in private ownership.Alternatively: what if you keep the handle, and submit a worker that pays a smaller amount but over a longer period of time for managing the account, tweeting, building followers, etc. This would be a like a dividend on your investment. Just a thought.
Quote from: btswildpig on March 21, 2016, 05:43:54 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 21, 2016, 01:47:54 amQuote from: btswildpig on March 19, 2016, 05:39:38 pmWho owns BitShares account name on Bitcointalk.org ?That's maybe a really really important marketing asset for us . Prepare yourself for a couple thousand bucks ! We will have a worker to pay for the account name .Who owns BitShares account name on Wechat Public platform (the most crowd social tool on earth) ? Prepare yourself for a couple thousand bucks ! We will have a worker to pay for the account name .hell , next thing we know , people would start to register all kinds of BitShares name on every major social networking tool (even dating site!) and wait to be brought by this community .Nice marketing .Twitter and FB are the most important social media accounts, we should control them as big brands do. Your sarcasm isn't helpful. I understand the power of twitter and FB well. One day of dilution isn't much to pay in the grand scheme of things. And the if we become big one day it will be even harder to get them then.After reading you reply , I've realized the importance of this . So , following your lead , I've purchased the most important social media account about BitShares in China's Wechat platform . So .....who should I contact to reimburse my 10000 USD for purchasing this important account ?Why would we want a we chat account. they are for private messaging not for creating a public image and making announcements. I think fb and twitter will do.
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 21, 2016, 01:47:54 amQuote from: btswildpig on March 19, 2016, 05:39:38 pmWho owns BitShares account name on Bitcointalk.org ?That's maybe a really really important marketing asset for us . Prepare yourself for a couple thousand bucks ! We will have a worker to pay for the account name .Who owns BitShares account name on Wechat Public platform (the most crowd social tool on earth) ? Prepare yourself for a couple thousand bucks ! We will have a worker to pay for the account name .hell , next thing we know , people would start to register all kinds of BitShares name on every major social networking tool (even dating site!) and wait to be brought by this community .Nice marketing .Twitter and FB are the most important social media accounts, we should control them as big brands do. Your sarcasm isn't helpful. I understand the power of twitter and FB well. One day of dilution isn't much to pay in the grand scheme of things. And the if we become big one day it will be even harder to get them then.After reading you reply , I've realized the importance of this . So , following your lead , I've purchased the most important social media account about BitShares in China's Wechat platform . So .....who should I contact to reimburse my 10000 USD for purchasing this important account ?
Quote from: btswildpig on March 19, 2016, 05:39:38 pmWho owns BitShares account name on Bitcointalk.org ?That's maybe a really really important marketing asset for us . Prepare yourself for a couple thousand bucks ! We will have a worker to pay for the account name .Who owns BitShares account name on Wechat Public platform (the most crowd social tool on earth) ? Prepare yourself for a couple thousand bucks ! We will have a worker to pay for the account name .hell , next thing we know , people would start to register all kinds of BitShares name on every major social networking tool (even dating site!) and wait to be brought by this community .Nice marketing .Twitter and FB are the most important social media accounts, we should control them as big brands do. Your sarcasm isn't helpful. I understand the power of twitter and FB well. One day of dilution isn't much to pay in the grand scheme of things. And the if we become big one day it will be even harder to get them then.
Who owns BitShares account name on Bitcointalk.org ?That's maybe a really really important marketing asset for us . Prepare yourself for a couple thousand bucks ! We will have a worker to pay for the account name .Who owns BitShares account name on Wechat Public platform (the most crowd social tool on earth) ? Prepare yourself for a couple thousand bucks ! We will have a worker to pay for the account name .hell , next thing we know , people would start to register all kinds of BitShares name on every major social networking tool (even dating site!) and wait to be brought by this community .Nice marketing .
Quote from: btswildpig on March 19, 2016, 05:31:14 pmQuote from: BunkerChain Labs on March 19, 2016, 02:13:46 pmQuote from: btswildpig on March 19, 2016, 06:59:07 amNext thing we know , people would start buying subway AD space on major city upfront and ask to be refunded by worker dilution , because people would by shy to vocal against it for all his contribution and the financial risk he was taken upfront . That will be an amazing marketing change . @tonyk what do you say The network owning it's own naming assets is really so terrible? This i fundamental to any business DAC or centralized.On the other hand.. there are other ways to recover the funds, it just might take a lot more work and time potentially... if he used the refer program and got paid on the refers sent to the network, i would take roughly referring 33 lifetime members to recover the funds. Who knows, at that point maybe he will just continue with it because its a good investment. There are a few ways to skin this cat, but the worker is clear, simple, and lets the voters decide how they want to manage the brand. Trolling commentaries with anything to do with Workers these days seems inevitable. It's tired, old, and has been shown to be a pointless irrational argument in comparison to every other virtual currency that is excelling in market cap with higher spending that for them is completely out of control. While we are in control. @JonnyBitcoin initiative to take action and secure our brand for the community is great. You think all your scenarios are going to come to pass then you better get to it and start getting all those spaces. Sounds like a great investment!It's funny . https://twitter.com/ethereumproject https://twitter.com/ethereumIf a Ethereum marketing is paying 3000 USD to buy a twitter account name , which one you think he would buy , and why ? The exact same name is not the asset on twitter . The count of the follower is . If one account has more follower than the others , regardless of what name it is , it will be enough to do marketing .It is funny.Care to share how much they are spending on all the other marketing and mining while you are at it? Lets compare apples to apples.This is after all just more dilution boogieman rhetoric.
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on March 19, 2016, 02:13:46 pmQuote from: btswildpig on March 19, 2016, 06:59:07 amNext thing we know , people would start buying subway AD space on major city upfront and ask to be refunded by worker dilution , because people would by shy to vocal against it for all his contribution and the financial risk he was taken upfront . That will be an amazing marketing change . @tonyk what do you say The network owning it's own naming assets is really so terrible? This i fundamental to any business DAC or centralized.On the other hand.. there are other ways to recover the funds, it just might take a lot more work and time potentially... if he used the refer program and got paid on the refers sent to the network, i would take roughly referring 33 lifetime members to recover the funds. Who knows, at that point maybe he will just continue with it because its a good investment. There are a few ways to skin this cat, but the worker is clear, simple, and lets the voters decide how they want to manage the brand. Trolling commentaries with anything to do with Workers these days seems inevitable. It's tired, old, and has been shown to be a pointless irrational argument in comparison to every other virtual currency that is excelling in market cap with higher spending that for them is completely out of control. While we are in control. @JonnyBitcoin initiative to take action and secure our brand for the community is great. You think all your scenarios are going to come to pass then you better get to it and start getting all those spaces. Sounds like a great investment!It's funny . https://twitter.com/ethereumproject https://twitter.com/ethereumIf a Ethereum marketing is paying 3000 USD to buy a twitter account name , which one you think he would buy , and why ? The exact same name is not the asset on twitter . The count of the follower is . If one account has more follower than the others , regardless of what name it is , it will be enough to do marketing .
Quote from: btswildpig on March 19, 2016, 06:59:07 amNext thing we know , people would start buying subway AD space on major city upfront and ask to be refunded by worker dilution , because people would by shy to vocal against it for all his contribution and the financial risk he was taken upfront . That will be an amazing marketing change . @tonyk what do you say The network owning it's own naming assets is really so terrible? This i fundamental to any business DAC or centralized.On the other hand.. there are other ways to recover the funds, it just might take a lot more work and time potentially... if he used the refer program and got paid on the refers sent to the network, i would take roughly referring 33 lifetime members to recover the funds. Who knows, at that point maybe he will just continue with it because its a good investment. There are a few ways to skin this cat, but the worker is clear, simple, and lets the voters decide how they want to manage the brand. Trolling commentaries with anything to do with Workers these days seems inevitable. It's tired, old, and has been shown to be a pointless irrational argument in comparison to every other virtual currency that is excelling in market cap with higher spending that for them is completely out of control. While we are in control. @JonnyBitcoin initiative to take action and secure our brand for the community is great. You think all your scenarios are going to come to pass then you better get to it and start getting all those spaces. Sounds like a great investment!
Next thing we know , people would start buying subway AD space on major city upfront and ask to be refunded by worker dilution , because people would by shy to vocal against it for all his contribution and the financial risk he was taken upfront . That will be an amazing marketing change . @tonyk what do you say
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 18, 2016, 03:04:39 amQuote from: onceuponatime on March 18, 2016, 01:54:51 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 18, 2016, 12:37:40 am@xeroc @Stan @bytemaster @cylonmaker2053 @Fox @DestBest @Chris4210 As with dailydecrypt sponsorship I got frustrated with no progress and have gone ahead and just done it. I have purchased these twitter and fb handles for the community because it needed to be done. Twitter.com/bitsharesFacebook.com/bitshareI paid $2800 for the both of them and expect the community to pay me back for them in full. (can forward email correspondence to prove sale to me)I think a worker proposal is the best way to collect the funds for this but am not competent enough with CLI client to create one myself. Could @xeroc or another trusted community member create a worker proposal to cover this $2800 and I will hand over these accounts to the commitee.Alternatively If cryptonomex wants to send it to me directly that would be easier. PS I need to wait a week before I change the graphics on the fb page.How much did you personally end up contributing to TheDailyDecrypt sponsorship? (that you didn't get reimbursed for by other donors?)All financial costs for the daily decrypt were covered by you, openledger and the community. I made it happen though by paying upfront with my own money and organising it all like I am doing again. I have personally contributed at least 6 hours of my own time back with emails and then cleaning up the accounts so they don't follow spam accounts etc.If the worker thing doesn't get voted in, you could always reimburse yourself through referral links on those social media accounts.
Quote from: onceuponatime on March 18, 2016, 01:54:51 amQuote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 18, 2016, 12:37:40 am@xeroc @Stan @bytemaster @cylonmaker2053 @Fox @DestBest @Chris4210 As with dailydecrypt sponsorship I got frustrated with no progress and have gone ahead and just done it. I have purchased these twitter and fb handles for the community because it needed to be done. Twitter.com/bitsharesFacebook.com/bitshareI paid $2800 for the both of them and expect the community to pay me back for them in full. (can forward email correspondence to prove sale to me)I think a worker proposal is the best way to collect the funds for this but am not competent enough with CLI client to create one myself. Could @xeroc or another trusted community member create a worker proposal to cover this $2800 and I will hand over these accounts to the commitee.Alternatively If cryptonomex wants to send it to me directly that would be easier. PS I need to wait a week before I change the graphics on the fb page.How much did you personally end up contributing to TheDailyDecrypt sponsorship? (that you didn't get reimbursed for by other donors?)All financial costs for the daily decrypt were covered by you, openledger and the community. I made it happen though by paying upfront with my own money and organising it all like I am doing again. I have personally contributed at least 6 hours of my own time back with emails and then cleaning up the accounts so they don't follow spam accounts etc.
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 18, 2016, 12:37:40 am@xeroc @Stan @bytemaster @cylonmaker2053 @Fox @DestBest @Chris4210 As with dailydecrypt sponsorship I got frustrated with no progress and have gone ahead and just done it. I have purchased these twitter and fb handles for the community because it needed to be done. Twitter.com/bitsharesFacebook.com/bitshareI paid $2800 for the both of them and expect the community to pay me back for them in full. (can forward email correspondence to prove sale to me)I think a worker proposal is the best way to collect the funds for this but am not competent enough with CLI client to create one myself. Could @xeroc or another trusted community member create a worker proposal to cover this $2800 and I will hand over these accounts to the commitee.Alternatively If cryptonomex wants to send it to me directly that would be easier. PS I need to wait a week before I change the graphics on the fb page.How much did you personally end up contributing to TheDailyDecrypt sponsorship? (that you didn't get reimbursed for by other donors?)
@xeroc @Stan @bytemaster @cylonmaker2053 @Fox @DestBest @Chris4210 As with dailydecrypt sponsorship I got frustrated with no progress and have gone ahead and just done it. I have purchased these twitter and fb handles for the community because it needed to be done. Twitter.com/bitsharesFacebook.com/bitshareI paid $2800 for the both of them and expect the community to pay me back for them in full. (can forward email correspondence to prove sale to me)I think a worker proposal is the best way to collect the funds for this but am not competent enough with CLI client to create one myself. Could @xeroc or another trusted community member create a worker proposal to cover this $2800 and I will hand over these accounts to the commitee.Alternatively If cryptonomex wants to send it to me directly that would be easier. PS I need to wait a week before I change the graphics on the fb page.
Quote from: Bhuz on March 18, 2016, 12:46:25 amWhy not use bitshares_official instead of giving 3k usd to a random guy?It's called good marketing. See above. Old owner was using it for bitcoin stuff, was embarrassing. Bitshares marketing has been historically very poor, we need to up our game and come across as professional.
Why not use bitshares_official instead of giving 3k usd to a random guy?
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on March 18, 2016, 01:17:29 amQuote from: Bhuz on March 18, 2016, 12:46:25 amWhy not use bitshares_official instead of giving 3k usd to a random guy?It's called good marketing. See above. Old owner was using it for bitcoin stuff, was embarrassing. Bitshares marketing has been historically very poor, we need to up our game and come across as professional. Absolutely. Our marketing needs to improve, we can all do a little bit!@xeroc would it be possible to mail twitter from postmaster@bitshares.org?
@xeroc @Stan @bytemaster @cylonmaker2053 @Fox @DestBest @Chris4210 As with dailydecrypt sponsorship I got frustrated with no progress and have gone ahead and just done it. I have purchased these twitter and fb handles for the community because it needed to be done. Twitter.com/bitsharesFacebook.com/bitsharesI paid $2800 for the both of them and expect the community to pay me back for them in full. (can forward email correspondence to prove sale to me)I think a worker proposal is the best way to collect the funds for this but am not competent enough with CLI client to create one myself. Could @xeroc or another trusted community member create a worker proposal to cover this $2800 and I will hand over these accounts to the commitee.Alternatively If cryptonomex wants to send it to me directly that would be easier. PS I need to wait a week before I change the graphics on the fb page.
I have purchased these twitter and fb handles for the community because it needed to be done. [...]I think a worker proposal is the best way to collect the funds for this but am not competent enough with CLI client to create one myself.
Quote from: Stan on March 09, 2016, 02:56:28 am[We applied for KeyhoteeTM and BitSharesTM at the same time.KeyhoteeTM was granted, BitSharesTM was not.Why? "Because 'BitShares' is too descriptive - you are just sharing bits"I'm not making this up.Thanks for the insights Stan. I do still wonder if Twitter would review the @bitshares account more closely under their Trademark Policy if the request originated from an @bitshares.org email address. The current Twitter account holder has @bitshares and also fb.com/bitshares and the domain bitshare.cnThe site founder lists the sir name Shares at bitshare.cnTwitter @bitshare looks to be long abandonfb.com/bitshare does not provide contentCan anyone else connect the dots as to what a reasonable solution may be?
[We applied for KeyhoteeTM and BitSharesTM at the same time.KeyhoteeTM was granted, BitSharesTM was not.Why? "Because 'BitShares' is too descriptive - you are just sharing bits"I'm not making this up.
We applied for KeyhoteeTM and BitSharesTM at the same time.KeyhoteeTM was granted, BitSharesTM was not.Why? "Because 'BitShares' is too descriptive - you are just sharing bits"I'm not making this up.
I feel @Stan or others connected to the former Invictus Innovations, Inc. (I3) need to revive their Service Mark application (or initiate a new one under a current entity), then pursue action with Twitter on their Trademark Policy to reclaim the @bitshares handle [1, 2]. QuoteWhat is a Trademark Policy Violation on Twitter?Using a company or business name, logo, or other trademark-protected materials in a manner that may mislead or confuse others with regard to its brand or business affiliation may be considered a trademark policy violation.Can someone remind us of the intention by I3 to file with USPTO in 2014 for "BITSHARES" and subsequently abandon that application [3]? I noticed that KEYHOTEE has been granted its second extension to I3 [2]. Please don't interpret that as accusatory in any way; simply want to understand the decision process and options for pursuing protection of the Service Mark going forward.Please note: I was unable to provide direct links to the USPTO search results, so included the Trademarkia.com content for ease of reference. You are encouraged to search the USPTO Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) directly and supply the search terms for source content [4]. [1] https://support.twitter.com/articles/18367[2] http://www.trademarkia.com/bitshares-86156522.html[3] http://www.trademarkia.com/keyhotee-86167329.html[4] http://tess2.uspto.gov/ Select: Basic Word Mark Search (New User)
What is a Trademark Policy Violation on Twitter?Using a company or business name, logo, or other trademark-protected materials in a manner that may mislead or confuse others with regard to its brand or business affiliation may be considered a trademark policy violation.
Why not set up BitSharesNewsBitSharesUpdateBitSharesOfficialI am holding @bitsharesmunich and tweet every day. I am almost alone :/ Get LOUD people
@JonnyBitcoin has contact to that guys who is willing to sell the twitter and facebook handle for ~$3k .. There was a forum thread about it as well