Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Delegate participation rate is over 95% now. Beautiful update speed (considering re-indexing time)
57+42 = close to 100%. So the smaller fork is starting to win over delegates?
I have some PTS on the Cryptsy Exchange. I see some posts in this thread disussing that I should withdraw them(!)
Can anyone please advice some other Exchange I could transfer my (old) PTS to, that will manage the conversion of my (old) PTS to (new) PTS, or must I move my PTS to a private wallet (any recommendations?).
A private wallet is always about 10x safer than an exchange. However, if you absolutely can't do a private wallet, Bter has been quite good about honoring snapshots.
Careful though - early on, the Sparkle dev said he was going to recommend that no exchange honor the snapshot. Like I said, you're always safer with a private wallet.
Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2
I entered my public key here and did not receive any BTS.
I also tried to use the Faucet link and it does not appear to work (3 different browsers on two different systems)
Am I missing something or are there any other suggestions on how to get some initial BTS ?
Is it a new Fed or an update?
It's just some guy named "Fed" and he's telling everybody his dollar is a mandatory upgrade.
cute sexy and nerdy? Those are generally the ones that are "undercover"
Hi cube,
Sorry to modify the title of your post. I am in support of your work. However, the previous title is very misleading, according to the feedback of Chinese community. First of all ,PTS is 原型股 in Chinese, not 比特股，比特股is specifically for BTS. In addition, we believe that nothing is "mandatory" except that it is updated by 3I dev teams. DPOS version PTS should compete with other 3rd party versions of PTS, for example, bitPTS.
Please don't change the title back again, otherwise, I will lock the topic.
Thanks for your understanding.
你好 cube,
很不好意思把你的帖子标题改掉。原标题是比特股PTS强制升级与快照公告。 这个标题非常有误导性，首先，BTS是比特股，PTS是原型股，你把这两个搞混了。其次，作为一个第三方DAC，它的升级不是强制的，应该是跟其他PTS的升级版，比如bitPTS公平竞争的，只有官方团队发布的产品才能够强制大家升级。
请尊重版规，不要再改回去，否则我会锁住帖子。
谢谢合作！
BTS和PTS现在哪个叫比特股 ？
一直以来都是BTS叫比特股，PTS叫原型股。
我赞成log的观点。赞成版主更改标题以提示社区。原标题《比特股PTS强制升级与快照公告》会对不明真相的社区成员和外界造成严重误导。
请大家以及交易所一定要认识到：这个项目并非来自3i或核心开发团队。
我个人认为pts的使命已经完成，11.5就是它的最终归属。
任何人都可以基于开源的toolkit进行DAC开发，但不应该给他的项目取名叫Bitshares PTS，更不能叫强制升级。我对这个项目的动机存疑，对它可能会对社区造成的危害表示担忧。
在开发者更改Bitshares PTS这个名字之前，我强烈反对这个项目
翻译:Who did they sell to?
他们卖给谁?
Who lost and who gained in that trade?
在这个贸易,谁输了，谁收益了？
Was one side unfairly taking advantage of the other?
有其中一方不公平对待另一方吗?
If so, which side?
如果有, 是那一方?
All information was available to everyone.
所有的信息已提供给大家。
We all watched the the thinking evolve in real time.
我们都即时的观看了思维进化。
The community discussed it every step of the way.
社区已讨论它的每一步。
And everyone made their own conclusions.
每个人都也做出了自己的结论。
I3 are no longer custodians of PTS, but they are in full support of the project. Many people are conflating these two things.
I3’s primary focus going forward will be BTS, but some of their devs have offered resources to the project already. Toast has offered development support in his free time, Cass has helped with the website, Testz supports the project, Stan and Dan have returned all funds from the BitShares Trust and both have expressed support for the project. There were potential regulatory risks associated with PTS funding and continued custodianship by I3. The major exchanges and services have also expressed support. Coinmarketcap is updated and BTER will honor the snapshot. As you can see, this project is about as official as things can get without explicit I3 ownership.
* A standalone DPOS blockchain makes PTS the only DAC-agnostic, non-inflationary DPOS chain and the best candidate for sharedropping by 3rd party DACs.
* PTS will also be the most logical chain to fork by 3rd party DACs. Our developer pc has already implemented an “import by signed message” feature which exists in no other crypto and is an absolute necessity for sharecropping DACs. See here: http://pts.cubeconnex.com/index.php?topic=37
As for the questions about incentive structure for running delegates, I think it is important to note that the incentives are exactly the same as those of the prior BTSX chain. As adoption and market cap grows, the incentives and decentralization of the network also increase.
The Chinese community has been integral to the success of PTS. We invite you to join us in growing the Bitshares ecosystem by building a strong, stable, and efficient PTS.
强制升级和公告这些词非官方不应使用。
说的都是屁话！
我反映的问题，3i又不是不知道。
代表收益怎么保障
1 每年增发pts给代表发工资？
2 一台服务器运行10个代表？
靠意淫能解决问题吗？
