76
General Discussion / Re: [ANN][metaexchange] Get paid up to 1000 BTS / month for using our signature!
« on: August 18, 2015, 10:55:05 pm »
Hmmm...
How come I am not in the Google sheet?
How come I am not in the Google sheet?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
77
Technical Support / Re: [BitShares 2.0 Technologies] User-Issued Assets (Discussion)
« on: August 16, 2015, 04:02:44 pm »@bytemaster / stanI think our preferred approach is to make the issuer account name prominent in the user interface.Cant we do both.
I think there is no good reason to allow me to register bitstamp.ZAR and the only reason I would do this is to scam people.
Why not remove that possibility.
I am looking to issue some UIAs and am therefore discovering what I would really like as a user.
Also if UIAs can float to establish any market pair, wouldnt they be distributed within the network making it difficult for users to find and know what are TRUE UIAs.
EDIT: also, each time a new cryptocurrency comes out that Bitstamp may wish to integrate with they would need to rush over to Bitshares and squat bitstamp.new_cryptocurrency before the scammer gets to it.
it would be super cool to get another answer from the devs on this.
78
Technical Support / Re: What is the cost of issuing a UIA currently and on 2.0
« on: August 16, 2015, 01:17:23 pm »all fees in bts2 are variable and voted by shareholders .. so they are NOT static ..Thanks Xeroc
at the testnet they require:
length-3 5,000,000 CORE
length-4 3,000,000 CORE
longer 50,000 CORE
79
Technical Support / What is the cost of issuing a UIA currently and on 2.0
« on: August 15, 2015, 10:22:55 pm »
Does anyone know.
Will the pricing for 2.0 be similar to that of account name registration (dependable on name length, use of digits etc).
Thanks
Will the pricing for 2.0 be similar to that of account name registration (dependable on name length, use of digits etc).
Thanks
80
General Discussion / Re: How to best perform an after-the-fact, unknown time sharedrop.
« on: August 15, 2015, 03:32:21 pm »
nice solution
81
General Discussion / Re: Bounty Quotes, please quote your services (trading bots dev work and assistance)
« on: August 14, 2015, 02:17:03 pm »
Thanks for the replies guys, I will PM respond.
Let me know if you dont get a PM, as I will reply.
I will leave this thread up until mid next week which is when I want to submit the proposal.
Let me know if you dont get a PM, as I will reply.
I will leave this thread up until mid next week which is when I want to submit the proposal.
82
General Discussion / [CLOSED] Bounty Quotes, please quote your services (trading bots dev work...)
« on: August 14, 2015, 12:01:59 pm »
EDIT: thanks for the feedback, the information has been used in compiling a report 
Hi guys,
I am looking to set up a fund raiser of sorts for the start up I work for.
Below are a few of the technical things we would need help with.
If you are interested please quote in bitUSD the amount you would expect in remuneration.
Please understand that I am just getting a feel for costing and whether or not we move forward with this is dependable on a number of factors.
We would want someone with a decent Bitshares community reputation.
For now, just ball park quotes/scientific wild ass guesses are fine (more accurate estimates can be requested at a later stage). The work is to be done after Bitshares 2.0 release.
Thanks!
1. Arbitrage trading bots that place and manage orders based on external price feeds from JSE OR NASDAQ. Basically we would like bots that would be able to manage trade orders based on external price feed data.
2. Bitshares client with control over the MPAs and UIAs that are displayed (this would be a nice-to-have and not an essential).
3. Assistance with issuance of UIAs.
4. Assistance with setting up dynamic account permissions and maintaining a secure wallet, cold storage of funds.
Hi guys,
I am looking to set up a fund raiser of sorts for the start up I work for.
Below are a few of the technical things we would need help with.
If you are interested please quote in bitUSD the amount you would expect in remuneration.
Please understand that I am just getting a feel for costing and whether or not we move forward with this is dependable on a number of factors.
We would want someone with a decent Bitshares community reputation.
For now, just ball park quotes/scientific wild ass guesses are fine (more accurate estimates can be requested at a later stage). The work is to be done after Bitshares 2.0 release.
Thanks!
1. Arbitrage trading bots that place and manage orders based on external price feeds from JSE OR NASDAQ. Basically we would like bots that would be able to manage trade orders based on external price feed data.
2. Bitshares client with control over the MPAs and UIAs that are displayed (this would be a nice-to-have and not an essential).
3. Assistance with issuance of UIAs.
4. Assistance with setting up dynamic account permissions and maintaining a secure wallet, cold storage of funds.
83
General Discussion / Re: Very disappointing BTS performance
« on: August 06, 2015, 06:27:01 pm »Working on a startup, one year in, which means I'm worse than broke!The only thing I regret is not having money to buy more BTS at this price. Right now I'm broke as shit because I have no job right now, but I'm going to be patient and see what the future beholds for Bitshares.lmao
Are you me?
But if I wasnt I would be taking advantage of these prices.
84
General Discussion / Re: No Sommer Announcements for the week?
« on: August 05, 2015, 06:28:48 pm »So we might have something from John Underwood, an update from DACx, still, I would be satisfied with 2 - 3 more announcements from other entities getting involved with BitShares but to be honest I don't know if that's asking too muchAnnouncement from DACx?
They have been a 100% delegate for a long time now but have not made a post in months.
85
General Discussion / Re: SETL Industrializes Blockchain For Enterprise-Level Financial Services Settlemen
« on: August 01, 2015, 11:12:10 pm »
The 100 000 TPS part.
Ya it is notable. A coincidence? I hope not
Ya it is notable. A coincidence? I hope not
86
General Discussion / Re: [ANN][metaexchange] Get paid up to 1000 BTS / month for using our signature!
« on: July 28, 2015, 07:32:22 pm »
Count me in
87
Technical Support / Re: [ANN] BANX Capital Joins BitShares Exchange Network
« on: July 28, 2015, 07:29:08 pm »Sorry to keep harping on about this. I'm really interested to see how it will work out."the first government to legally recognize a digital asset"
that's pretty deep
Thats what I am aiming for mate ...
Would it not cause more issues if the legal entity issuing the digital assets is in a country where the digital assets are legally recognized. Because then you will be allowing the anonymous trade of legally recognized assets and you wont be monitoring users/customers for activity and therefore cannot comply with reporting standards, AML, KYC regulations and laws.
88
General Discussion / Re: SETL now a BTS competitor
« on: July 28, 2015, 07:21:54 pm »
Perhaps its a centralized blockchain, hence the speeds.
Financial sector does not really care much about the academic decentralized debate, its more about improving efficiency and cutting costs.
One node with a maybe two backups of the chain is good enough.
Financial sector does not really care much about the academic decentralized debate, its more about improving efficiency and cutting costs.
One node with a maybe two backups of the chain is good enough.
89
General Discussion / Re: Seems like now would be the perfect time for Bitshares to "make nice"
« on: July 26, 2015, 09:02:08 pm »
90
Random Discussion / gemini.com Its a car being pulled by a horse
« on: July 25, 2015, 12:41:46 pm »
A 'next generation bitcoin exchange'
Its related to Bitcoin yet every statement on their web front page is related to trust and centralized problems. The only way forward is a decentralized exchange otherwise counterparty risk will always be a problem.
"Gemini operates fully in the United States. We work exclusively with American banks; your dollars never leave the country." Excellent
"Keeping your money safe is our top priority. We have assembled the nation's top security experts and financial engineers to make sure Gemini stays secure." ummm.. heard of the blockchain.
"We are working with federal and state governments to launch in full compliance with all Bitcoin regulations and consumer protection laws." aaaahh sounds scary
Its related to Bitcoin yet every statement on their web front page is related to trust and centralized problems. The only way forward is a decentralized exchange otherwise counterparty risk will always be a problem.
"Gemini operates fully in the United States. We work exclusively with American banks; your dollars never leave the country." Excellent
"Keeping your money safe is our top priority. We have assembled the nation's top security experts and financial engineers to make sure Gemini stays secure." ummm.. heard of the blockchain.
"We are working with federal and state governments to launch in full compliance with all Bitcoin regulations and consumer protection laws." aaaahh sounds scary
