I would choose Crypviser with real ground breaking blockchain communication and security technology based on bitshares instead of bitspark.
A registered company based in Germany/Switzerland which is trying to comply with all regulations.

Crypviser has also the advantage that they can explain why they switched from Ethereum to Bitshares and have a fully working product.

Quote from: Thul3 on August 28, 2019, 09:47:27 am

In my opinion there is another major issue which is defining the goal of bitshares.
There are people out who see this project as an pure anti governmental project being 100% decentralised and not fullfilling any regulations and being anonymous (which is unrealistic and impossible in my opinion even with satelites,ships etc)

Then there is a second part of community (which i call a bit more realistic) who are seeing that the way bitshares is currently moving has no future because of future regulations and will do no good for BTS price.Some big players already focusing on their realistic vision instead of bitshares because of that reason.They also belive thats the reason bitshares has no big partnership company till today because it wouldn't pass regulations.

Third group are people who are leaving bitshares because beliving we lost momentum and that other decentralised assets are better (which in my opinion is a wrong opinion)

Fourth group are chinese which invested a lot into bitshares and i doubt chinese want to build an anti governmental project but are focusing on a truely decentralised project which will pass regulations (Of course this is my personal opinion and it would be wise to ask chinese about their opinion) and are more profit oriented.
But since in china in 2020 will be citizen score officaly implemented and majority chinese are pro government i doubt they want this project to be an eyesore for their government.

There are a lot of people on bitshares with diffrent understanding and diffrent level of background knowledge which makes it hard to find a consense since something which is for somebody clear is being denied by somebody else because they act on diffrent experience.

WE MUST ENHANCE THE NETWORK POWER STRUCTURE TO ELIMINATE THE ABILITY OF SELF-INTERESTS TO DEVALUE BTS.

Thanks for your feedback.

First of all there are no dumpers who are voting.There are people with diffrent kind of views how bitshares should proceed.
Biggest BTS holders are also the biggest supporters of BTS so the wording dumpers is invalid.

In my opinion there is another major issue which is defining the goal of bitshares.
There are people out who see this project as an pure anti governmental project being 100% decentralised and not fullfilling any regulations and being anonymous (which is unrealistic and impossible in my opinion even with satelites,ships etc)

Then there is a second part of community (which i call a bit more realistic) who are seeing that the way bitshares is currently moving has no future because of future regulations and will do no good for BTS price.Some big players already focusing on their realistic vision instead of bitshares because of that reason.They also belive thats the reason bitshares has no big partnership company till today because it wouldn't pass regulations.

Third group are people who are leaving bitshares because beliving we lost momentum and that other decentralised assets are better (which in my opinion is a wrong opinion)

Fourth group are chinese which invested a lot into bitshares and i doubt chinese want to build an anti governmental project but are focusing on a truely decentralised project which will pass regulations (Of course this is my personal opinion and it would be wise to ask chinese about their opinion) and are more profit oriented.
But since in china in 2020 will be citizen score officaly implemented and majority chinese are pro government i doubt they want this project to be an eyesore for their government.

There are a lot of people on bitshares with diffrent understanding and diffrent level of background knowledge which makes it hard to find a consense since something which is for somebody clear is being denied by somebody else because they act on diffrent experience.

Isn't the Marketing fee sharing income way higher than your base opertion cost $9100 (63k cny) ?
I asked before about the income of market fee sharing because i saw the same as abit did that you got bigger amounts of cny from the vesting balance of the market fee sharing which was over 120k cny in a single month which i guess were not planned in your calculation.There is no sign this income will dry out soon.

Personly i didn't vote for the worker of BTSPP because i think you already get a big unexpected income which doesn't justify anymore the need of over $300k usd from the reserve fund which i also consider a bit expensiv

btspp-registrar transfer 80000 CNY to btspp-team 2019/07/30 07:19:42 39632804
btspp-registrar transfer 40000 CNY to btspp-team 2019/07/23 08:29:24 39433112
btspp-registrar transfer 5000 CNY to btspp-team 2019/07/16 02:52:57 39225329

1，关于我们的worker工作内容是为社区开发一款移动端产品，包含规划的功能或社区需求的功能开发。完成后并最终开源。开源的代码任何个人或者企业都可以自行使用或运营（目前已知CTS和GDEX皆有在使用部分或全部该代码）
2，现运营并提供苹果和安卓下载的比特股移动钱包（bts++）的运营成本和收入不包含在worker工作内容之内。
3，中国区域由于政策原因无法上架区域商店进行下载等原因我们将继续运营现有的产品。未来我们希望将比特股移动钱包放到官网、苹果、谷歌商店下载并采用社区水龙头。（需要BBF的协助和配合，目前正在推进中）
4，由于手续费返佣是在我们woker通过后新加入的功能，并在之后拥有收入所以我们将取消并退还原计划的9100美元的基础运营成本费用。
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1. About our worker work is to develop a mobile product for the community, including functional development of planned functions or community needs. After the completion and eventually open source. Open source code can be used or operated by any individual or business (currently both CTS and GDEX use some or all of this code)
2. The operating costs and income of BitShare Mobile Wallet (bts++), which is currently operating and providing Apple and Android downloads, are not included in the work of the worker.
3. We will continue to operate existing products due to reasons such as the inability to upload regional stores for download due to policy reasons. In the future, we hope to put the BitShare mobile wallet on the official website, Apple, Google Store and use the community faucet. (requires assistance and cooperation from BBF, currently under progress)
4. Since the marketing fee share is a new feature after we worker passes, and then has revenue, we will cancel and refund the planned base operating cost of $9,100.

怎么样decentralized partnership ?

not possible to read if you have no account on weibo

How much market fee sharing is that app getting on average per day ?

Is so much funding still needed if BTSSP-REGISTRAR has now an unexpected nice amount of income from market fee share?

Am supporting it.Thats something i asked from the beginning.

Multi level provisionon refferes is already industry standard so there should be no legal problems.