IMO, the market list under the trading history is not useful. Please consider to remove it.
@clayop:
The market list on the exchange page is VERY useful if you're interested in watching more than one market and easily switching between them. Granted, it's not as useful as it should be. But that's only because it still needs work, as svk mentioned. Give it a chance. You'll see what I mean. Poloniex has a similar feature and it's easily one of the best things about their UI.
@svk:
I agree, replacing base supply with last price, volume (24h), price change (24h) in the list of markets on the trading UI would be great. Also, if I could make a couple more suggestions related to the order book, please see "before/after" examples along with notes below:
Current:
Value | Amount | Price |
(BTC) | (BTS) | (BTC/BTS) |
---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- |
|
|
0.0900000 | 6,750.0000 | 0.00001330 |
0.0060000 | 449.9998 | 0.00001330 |
0.0010000 | 80.0000 | 0.00001250 |
|
---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- |
|
Last price: | 0.00001 | BTC/BTS |
|
---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- |
|
0.0001000 | 8.5744 | 0.00001166 |
0.2141000 | 19,463.6381 | 0.00001100 |
0.1200000 | 11,196.0000 | 0.00001072 |
Suggested:
Cost | Quantity | Bid/Ask |
(BTC) | (BTS) | (BTC/BTS) |
---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- |
|
|
0.0900000 | 6,750.0000 | 0.00001333 |
0.0060000 | 449.9998 | 0.00001333 |
0.0010000 | 80.0000 | 0.00001250 |
|
---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- |
|
| 0.00001166 | |
|
---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- |
|
0.0001000 | 8.5744 | 0.00001166 |
0.2141000 | 19,463.6381 | 0.00001100 |
0.1200000 | 11,196.0000 | 0.00001072 |
1. In the
market history table, you've already color coded the sells (red) and buys (green), which is perfect. But color coding bid/ask on the
order book is unconventional and a little confusing since a buy, for example, would be at the ask - and it's coded red on the order book - whereas the actual trade at that same ask price would be coded green in the trade history. That doesn't make sense. And reversing the color coding of the bids and asks on the order book would not make sense either. So I would highly recommend NOT using red/green on the order book itself (except for the last price). Instead, I would do what most of the other order books do i.e. simply use a larger and/or more bold font for the important part of the bid/ask.
2. Speaking of highlighting the important part of the bid/ask, currently you are doing that for everything before the decimal point (both on order book and in market history). That is great when there are non-zero numbers before the decimal. But when there are leading zeroes, it would be much more helpful to highlight everything AFTER the leading zeroes.
3. Please strip out the "Last price:" label and the units (e.g. BTC/BTS) indicator. That text is unnecessary (obvious in the case of the last price label, and redundant in the case of the units indicator since it's in the order book column header) and makes the eyes have to dig for the relevant information.
4. The current order book column headers (Value - Amount - Price) are really too vague and practically all have the same meaning. That's really not helpful. Please consider using more precise headers instead (Cost - Quantity - Bid/Ask). This really does make a difference.
5. The last price is being truncated to only 5 decimal points instead of 8.
Thanks again for your effort on this!