Quote from: Randomaniac on September 06, 2015, 08:20:13 pm

Quote from: CoinGame on September 06, 2015, 12:11:01 pm

Quote from: cass on September 02, 2015, 10:52:29 am

maybe we can someone from nubits team on here to join this discussion..

What did you guys want to know? We're very friendly. You can come join our board if you have any questions discuss.nubits.com

I may not be from the NuBits team, but I'm quite familiar with it
Aren't we all friendly?

Ehhhhh I'm not sure I would go that far given the posts I read about NuBits on here over the past year, but it's nice to see ponzi scheme isn't being thrown around so loosely anymore.

Touché!

 Outside of the 2.0 launch specifics for BTS, I think the Chinese stock market troubles will bring some $$$ back to crypto. Also, if you look at CMC there appears to be some manipulation going on across crypto in general.

Quote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 am

Quote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 am

Quote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 am

Quote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 pm

When Tony says buy you buy.

A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. 

Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pm

Quote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pm

Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.

I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects

Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out.  This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.

 
good idea    lan   Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks

@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).

Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have 

Agreed!!

Just an aside - I am so impressed by Fox. Dude has very calmly and quietly made huge contributions to BTS - and done so in a very thoughtful, professional manner. Kudos to you, sir.

Quote from: DataSecurityNode on September 03, 2015, 12:18:35 pm

Quote from: fav on September 03, 2015, 12:13:10 pm

Quote from: bulletproof on September 03, 2015, 12:09:39 pm

well  for trying to help us "simple" users @fav 

level wise of course

but I doubt there is an easy fix... I proposed to move to a 2.0 forum with nice features and so on... but many users didn't want a change :<

We have avoided doing much with forums at dposhub specifically because bitsharestalk already exists and we are not looking to compete with the type of talk that goes on here... . are you suggesting there should be another space for bitshares only stakeholders?

a bit OT but it would be perfectly legit to have a "private" forum for stakeholders, and DPOSHUB is the right place. in 2.0 you can easily proof that you are one. entry level 100k or something. I would welcome this.

^^ I think that is a very good idea.

If I understand this correctly they wrote their own code to institute DPOS.  I don't think they owe us anything.  I'm glad they're using DPOS, and hope they are very successful.  I'm not as motivated to help as I would be if I owned a chunk, and that is a valid point, but by no means a deal breaker in regards to my support.  I'll try to take the time to learn about them.

Well said Puppies! I agree!

I would like to see Mesh Networks begin to proliferate as a solution to ISP censorship. Here's a cool article about how FireChat was used during the protests in Hong Kong.

http://berkeleytechreview.com/firechat-and-activism/

Quote from: phillyguy on August 29, 2015, 01:46:45 am

Announcements do not have value. Software does. Until 2.0 is official and the referral program is operational, words are just words.

No, words give the wise insight into what will surely be.

By the time the conditions exist that you describe, the answer will be obvious to everyone and the biggest investment opportunities will have passed.

In some endeavors is pays to be skeptical.  But when the open source and test nets and hours of mumble press conferences are happening before your very eyes, skepticism is just a way to avoid doing the hard work of examining the plain evidence for yourself.

This is the way it should be.  To the diligent go the rewards.  The rest are left saying, "Why don't I ever get a break?"

Stan,

I attend the mumble hangouts. I've played around with a witness node on my RPI2. I'm aware of what the technical possibilities and opportunities are of BitShares 2.0...so I wouldn't say I am "avoiding the hard work of examining the plain evidence."

My point is that an announcement in of itself, is not worth anything. You can (and do) make announcements all summer long, but if none of them actually pan out - what are they worth? You cannot guarantee anything. Past history proves this.

When 2.0 was announced, BM said "this summer". We will see about that. I'm a HODLer - don't get me wrong...all I'm saying is that your announcements are not worth what you think they are to many community members here.