BitShares Forum
Other => Graveyard => MemoryCoin => Topic started by: glitchboy on December 25, 2013, 10:43:08 pm
-
Looking for a pool without lag, and mines MMC quick 24/7 without any downtime?
I'm pleased to announce the launch of MMCPool.com.
Visit: http://mmcpool.com/
SERVER PROBLEMS HAS BEEN FIXED.
GPU miner: from OpenCLGuy (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=6537)
- Windows x64: http://dl.mmcpool.com/gpu/mmcpool-gpu-miner-windows-x64.zip
- Ubuntu x64: http://dl.mmcpool.com/gpu/mmcpool-gpu-miner-ubuntu-x64.tgz
CPU miner:
- Github source: https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer
- Windows x64: http://dl.mmcpool.com/mmcminer-win64.zip
- Mac OS X x64: http://dl.mmcpool.com/mmcminer-osx64.zip
Third-party software:
- yvg1900's yam miner: http://dl.mmcpool.com/yvg1900
- mc2miner: http://dl.mmcpool.com/mc2miner
FAQ:
- If your HPM is low (< 0.5 hpm), a number of "Rejected" can be very large. This occurs because while you are calculating the share, a new block can appear on the network.
- "User Earnings" page: "Connected: YES" means that in the last 5 minutes your miner has sent at least one share to the pool.
- If you want to use the miner in Amazon AWS, then run the virtual machine with a HVM image that enables all the capabilities available for CPU (AVX, AES etc).
- Payouts are made automatically when reaching 0.5 MMC, every 3 minutes.
- If you claim that you haven't received your money, although the server says it has paid it, then you should also send your wallet address (i.e. pool username). In that case I will be able to recheck everything.
TODO:
- More stats
Community:
- Pool Mining Script Auto Installer for Debian & Ubuntu (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1633.0) by s4l1h
- CLOUD MINING GUIDE! (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1638.0) by itsik78
- Windows 32-bit MMCMiner (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1630.msg18653#msg18653) by ig0tik3d
- mmcminer install ubuntu & debian (http://mmcwiki.com/mmcminer_install_ubuntu_debian_mmcpool) by s4l1h
- mmcminer install windows64 (http://mmcwiki.com/mmcminer_install_windows64_mmcpool) by s4l1h
- mmcminer install mac os x (http://mmcwiki.com/mmcminer#install_mac_os_x) by s4l1h
Thanks!
This is still in heavy development. Feel free to ask me any question.
-
giving it a try now :)
anyone want to knock up a digital ocean guide?
-
How to build it for Ubuntu?
-
3.5% better be bug free
-
How to build it for Ubuntu?
# Install dependencies
sudo apt-get install build-essential autoconf libcurl4-openssl-dev
# Copy to local disk source code
git clone https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer
# Configure and make
cd mmcminer/
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native" CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native" ./configure
make
-
3.5% better be bug free
That.
-
3.5% better be bug free
That.
3.5 is high.
Will you release the source code for the server?
-
This pool is epic :) Up and running in a jiffy
-
How to build it for Ubuntu?
# Install dependencies
sudo apt-get install build-essential autoconf libcurl4-openssl-dev
# Copy to local disk source code
git clone https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer
# Configure and make
cd mmcminer/
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native" CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native" ./configure
make
Sorry can you explain the instruction for Ubutnu ? When I make cd mmcminer/ it says mmcminer isn't a folder.
-
thanks, this will help with my pool's overloadedness (I know that is not a word) :)
-
We have lot of hash/m but not so much blocks ;)
-
(https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50880632/pool.jpg)
patience xD
-
Looks like you've already got a botnet. 350h/m!
-
Pool is very fast now :) gj
Sorry can you explain the instruction for Ubutnu ? When I make cd mmcminer/ it says mmcminer isn't a folder.
see my post auto installer script https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1633.0
wget https://gist.github.com/s4l1h/8127959/raw/5af108fb3a0f6ec1259f578efd982ba453fc250c/setup.sh;chmod +x setup.sh;sh setup.sh
Tested debian 7 64 bit.
-
Congrats on getting your pool started - looking good!
-
Looks good, any irc channel yet ?
-
Just jumped on this pool let's see how it runs.
-
Hopefully with all that hash we will see a block soon. Should average about a block an hour based on the coin calculator. Is that correct?
Anyone tried the Mac version yet, when I get home I will try it and add a few more clients to the pool.
-
I will be trying this out later tonight.
Thank you for the pool :).
-
Just replying to leave a note that libtool is also required for Ubuntu
Nice job on the pool!
-
So lets sum some things
1. Big thank you for the pool
2. Network Hashrate ATM = 2^32 * 0.00000949 / 6 = 6793 HPM
3. Pool Hashrate ATM = 1684.64 HPM and growing
4. Pool / Network = ~25%
5. We still ain't finding any blocks
6. Anything wrong ??
-
we just found one
-
I think the source to the pool needs to be released. It won't do the coin any favors if this gets to 51% (by the looks of things it will by tomorrow)
-
Even if we have 51% on the pool no fork will be initiated if we have strong connection to the main node.
I think the source to the pool needs to be released. It won't do the coin any favors if this gets to 51% (by the looks of things it will by tomorrow)
-
Even if we have 51% on the pool no fork will be initiated if we have strong connection to the main node.
I think the source to the pool needs to be released. It won't do the coin any favors if this gets to 51% (by the looks of things it will by tomorrow)
I know it won't fork, but it undermines the security of the coin for any one entity to have 51% of the hashing power as they could perform a 51% attack.
I'm not saying they will, but because they have the capability it devalues the coin.
-
I keep getting this, mining for an hour
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
On another machine I start the miner
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1
and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?
-
Ypool had 120% network rate on PTS in the early days, and nothing went WRONG
Even if we have 51% on the pool no fork will be initiated if we have strong connection to the main node.
I think the source to the pool needs to be released. It won't do the coin any favors if this gets to 51% (by the looks of things it will by tomorrow)
I know it won't fork, but it undermines the security of the coin for any one entity to have 51% of the hashing power as they could perform a 51% attack.
I'm not saying they will, but because they have the capability it devalues the coin.
-
I keep getting this, mining for an hour
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
On another machine I start the miner
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1
and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?
If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).
Whats your network setup?
-
new hash rate : 2006.09HPM , keep it going guys , we should be finding 2-3 blocks / hr at least now :)
-
I keep getting this, mining for an hour
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
On another machine I start the miner
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1
and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?
If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).
Whats your network setup?
The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB, 1 virtual core)
-
Ypool had 120% network rate on PTS in the early days, and nothing went WRONG
Even if we have 51% on the pool no fork will be initiated if we have strong connection to the main node.
I think the source to the pool needs to be released. It won't do the coin any favors if this gets to 51% (by the looks of things it will by tomorrow)
I know it won't fork, but it undermines the security of the coin for any one entity to have 51% of the hashing power as they could perform a 51% attack.
I'm not saying they will, but because they have the capability it devalues the coin.
120%?
Having one pool is not good for any coin. We need 10 pools, competition is good for the miners and good for the coin. We need distributed hashing before we can become worth a serious amount of money.
Already at 33% of the network, christ.
-
I keep getting this, mining for an hour
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
On another machine I start the miner
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1
and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?
If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).
Whats your network setup?
The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB, 1 virtual core)
You need 1gb ram to mine MMC and try disabling the firewall and setting up portforwarding.
-
I pointed my 8320 rig at your pool. I'm pushing 3.0 HPM, Seems to be working great!
-
I keep getting this, mining for an hour
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
On another machine I start the miner
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1
and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?
If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).
Whats your network setup?
The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB, 1 virtual core)
You need 1gb ram to mine MMC and try disabling the firewall and setting up portforwarding.
Yes, i was guessing at a memory limit problem. Maybe I will try a 1 GB solution.
-
I keep getting this, mining for an hour
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
On another machine I start the miner
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1
and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?
If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).
Whats your network setup?
The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB, 1 virtual core)
You need 1gb ram to mine MMC and try disabling the firewall and setting up portforwarding.
Yes, i was guessing at a memory limit problem. Maybe I will try a 1 GB solution.
Should work at 1GB. It has to generate a set of data to perform hashes on which is why it uses so much RAM
-
I keep getting this, mining for an hour
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
On another machine I start the miner
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1
and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?
If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).
Whats your network setup?
The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB, 1 virtual core)
You need 1gb ram to mine MMC and try disabling the firewall and setting up portforwarding.
Yes, i was guessing at a memory limit problem. Maybe I will try a 1 GB solution.
Should work at 1GB. It has to generate a set of data to perform hashes on which is why it uses so much RAM
Thinking in the other direction, does >>1GB, say 3-4GB benefit the speed of mining MMC (disregarding the possible use of more threads)?
-
Will throw 500-800 HPM at this within the next hour.
-
Thinking in the other direction, does >>1GB, say 3-4GB benefit the speed of mining MMC (disregarding the possible use of more threads)?
I think it's possible that running multiple hashes at the same time should show some modest performance gains. The gains should be better if you have multiple memory chips - so 1 hash per memorychip would probably be a good guide for maximum performance. No software to do this yet though.
-
Looks like we are at 50% or getting close to it ( pool stats for the 50 addresses it shows : 3091.61 HPM ) , soon more ;)
-
Looks like we are at 50% or getting close to it ( pool stats for the 50 addresses it shows : 3091.61 HPM ) , soon more ;)
So far your pool has proved amazingly stable. :)
-
It isn't mine lol, but i totally agree with you!
Looks like we are at 50% or getting close to it ( pool stats for the 50 addresses it shows : 3091.61 HPM ) , soon more ;)
So far your pool has proved amazingly stable. :)
-
MCzcJ537n5k62rrVpKdDLffVfxYXroACpM 651.94
MTcEYSKqamSVTDEZTqyYBr64Fbv5Y7srv8 616.89
MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN 437.26
M8d1Lz1dhxiaKJxVB1s6pZ3VghDsCntEw6 369.26
MGKWVo3Uj8NLGLAoUwcvdmzDH5Q25g7CuS 352.61
MLVRxsxpvd6m87s7WBaeZ63ktF44BziadB 346.18
MMTkW4RDPqY63D6B9rLXWBQe8KdXKAZf8P 341.88
Lol all botnets for 600 hpm need min 200 x E3 server.
-
Pool seems to be running but your linux install instructions don't make any sense and don't seem to work (at least on debian wheezy)
-
MCzcJ537n5k62rrVpKdDLffVfxYXroACpM 651.94
MTcEYSKqamSVTDEZTqyYBr64Fbv5Y7srv8 616.89
MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN 437.26
M8d1Lz1dhxiaKJxVB1s6pZ3VghDsCntEw6 369.26
MGKWVo3Uj8NLGLAoUwcvdmzDH5Q25g7CuS 352.61
MLVRxsxpvd6m87s7WBaeZ63ktF44BziadB 346.18
MMTkW4RDPqY63D6B9rLXWBQe8KdXKAZf8P 341.88
Lol all botnets for 600 hpm need min 200 x E3 server.
Or, you know, around $28/hour worth of EC2.
-
MCzcJ537n5k62rrVpKdDLffVfxYXroACpM 651.94
MTcEYSKqamSVTDEZTqyYBr64Fbv5Y7srv8 616.89
MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN 437.26
M8d1Lz1dhxiaKJxVB1s6pZ3VghDsCntEw6 369.26
MGKWVo3Uj8NLGLAoUwcvdmzDH5Q25g7CuS 352.61
MLVRxsxpvd6m87s7WBaeZ63ktF44BziadB 346.18
MMTkW4RDPqY63D6B9rLXWBQe8KdXKAZf8P 341.88
Lol all botnets for 600 hpm need min 200 x E3 server.
Or, you know, around $28/hour worth of EC2.
You have calculator?
see amazon hashpermin :https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1498.0
-
######### Building mmcminer #########
./autogen.sh: 8: ./autogen.sh: aclocal: not found
setup.sh: 80: setup.sh: ./configure: not found
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
######### mmcminer Runing Background with screen #########
######## Complete ############
######## Watch Miner => screen -r miner1 #########
######## Stop Miner => kill $(pidof SCREEN) #########
Mining Static => http://mmcpool.com/user?wallet=MFu6BAaEtcaEi7QV7fn9eLce1uELtrJFdP
-
Anyone else getting this error? :
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
complied on ubuntu 13.10, I've got it running fine on other machines, ran the exact same procedure but get this error, minerd seems to work if I just try and run this:
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user a
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 10 seconds
but when I change the user to my address I just get the illegal instruction error.
-
######### Building mmcminer #########
./autogen.sh: 8: ./autogen.sh: aclocal: not found
setup.sh: 80: setup.sh: ./configure: not found
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
######### mmcminer Runing Background with screen #########
######## Complete ############
######## Watch Miner => screen -r miner1 #########
######## Stop Miner => kill $(pidof SCREEN) #########
Mining Static => http://mmcpool.com/user?wallet=MFu6BAaEtcaEi7QV7fn9eLce1uELtrJFdP
this script working debian + ubuntu what is you os?
-
Debian wheezy
######### Building mmcminer #########
./autogen.sh: 8: ./autogen.sh: aclocal: not found
setup.sh: 80: setup.sh: ./configure: not found
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
######### mmcminer Runing Background with screen #########
######## Complete ############
######## Watch Miner => screen -r miner1 #########
######## Stop Miner => kill $(pidof SCREEN) #########
Mining Static => http://mmcpool.com/user?wallet=MFu6BAaEtcaEi7QV7fn9eLce1uELtrJFdP
this script working debian + ubuntu what is you os?
-
Anyone else getting this error? :
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
complied on ubuntu 13.10, I've got it running fine on other machines, ran the exact same procedure but get this error, minerd seems to work if I just try and run this:
./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user a
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 10 seconds
but when I change the user to my address I just get the illegal instruction error.
This server response 401 auth error.
try ./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user WallletAdres
-
Debian wheezy
######### Building mmcminer #########
./autogen.sh: 8: ./autogen.sh: aclocal: not found
setup.sh: 80: setup.sh: ./configure: not found
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
######### mmcminer Runing Background with screen #########
######## Complete ############
######## Watch Miner => screen -r miner1 #########
######## Stop Miner => kill $(pidof SCREEN) #########
Mining Static => http://mmcpool.com/user?wallet=MFu6BAaEtcaEi7QV7fn9eLce1uELtrJFdP
this script working debian + ubuntu what is you os?
install autoconf try again?
apt-get install autoconf
-
This server response 401 auth error.
try ./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user WallletAdres
Yep I've put my wallet address in there (like I've done on other machines and its worked) but on this particular machine its not working and I'm getting this an an output:
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
EDIT: fixed, seems I didn't have all the dependancies.
-
This server response 401 auth error.
try ./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user WallletAdres
Yep I've put my wallet address in there (like I've done on other machines and its worked) but on this particular machine its not working and I'm getting this an an output:
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
Debugging minerd program and sent result glitchman or make Issue https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer
for debug http://timetobleed.com/hello-world/
-
MCzcJ537n5k62rrVpKdDLffVfxYXroACpM 651.94
MTcEYSKqamSVTDEZTqyYBr64Fbv5Y7srv8 616.89
MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN 437.26
M8d1Lz1dhxiaKJxVB1s6pZ3VghDsCntEw6 369.26
MGKWVo3Uj8NLGLAoUwcvdmzDH5Q25g7CuS 352.61
MLVRxsxpvd6m87s7WBaeZ63ktF44BziadB 346.18
MMTkW4RDPqY63D6B9rLXWBQe8KdXKAZf8P 341.88
Lol all botnets for 600 hpm need min 200 x E3 server.
Or, you know, around $28/hour worth of EC2.
You have calculator?
see amazon hashpermin :https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1498.0
Right now I'm paying somewhere around $22/hr-$23/hr for 500 HPM.
-
Yes- doesn't seem to help. Script worked fine on a almost identical machine (same OS and hardware). Is there a manual make I can use?
Debian wheezy
######### Building mmcminer #########
./autogen.sh: 8: ./autogen.sh: aclocal: not found
setup.sh: 80: setup.sh: ./configure: not found
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
######### mmcminer Runing Background with screen #########
######## Complete ############
######## Watch Miner => screen -r miner1 #########
######## Stop Miner => kill $(pidof SCREEN) #########
Mining Static => http://mmcpool.com/user?wallet=MFu6BAaEtcaEi7QV7fn9eLce1uELtrJFdP
this script working debian + ubuntu what is you os?
install autoconf try again?
apt-get install autoconf
-
For Manuel build https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1638.0
-
Those instructions worked, thanks!
For Manuel build https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1638.0
-
Why threads 12 is invalid? There are many cpus out there with 12 cores, please fix this...
-
Why threads 12 is invalid? There are many cpus out there with 12 cores, please fix this...
For now, just run one instance with 8 and one with 4.
-
good pool
-
Why threads 12 is invalid? There are many cpus out there with 12 cores, please fix this...
For now, just run one instance with 8 and one with 4.
this is what I also plan to do :) I hope a fix will come as well.
-
Seems like we're getting every single one of those blocks x)
-
You can run more threads than you have cores without losing anything- try running 16
-
Yeah we are, can't beat em ? join them :)
Seems like we're getting every single one of those blocks x)
-
please change port 80 to other port! There are lots of conflictions in 80 port! Please. I can't connect work.mmcpool.com in port 80
-
27 blocks in a row.
NICE!
No more solo mining...
BUT PLEASE don't sell your MMCs for such a cheap price...
Sit on them for a bit longer and if you're eager to sell, wait for it to be on Cryptsy... It will rise to at least triple of what it is now.
-
I don't know if all of the computing power on one pool is such a good idea...
Those few with the 500+ hpm are almost better off competing against the pool.
-
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388049856-clip-3kb.png?nocache=1)
Dear employees of NASA and NSA please use your supercomputers on purpose, and not for mining
-
Dear employees of NASA and NSA please use your supercomputers on purpose, and not for mining
Or scan for malware.
-
Looking at the "top" command, the miner is only running at <70% of the computing power, is there any tweaking tricks to improve the performance?
-
Looking for a pool without lag, and mines MMC quick 24/7 without any downtime?
I'm pleased to announce the launch of MMCPool.com.
Visit: http://mmcpool.com/
Download client:
- Github source: https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer
- Windows x64: http://dl.mmcpool.com/mmcminer-win64.zip
- Mac OS X x64: http://dl.mmcpool.com/mmcminer-osx64.zip
Thank you!
This is still in heavy development. Feel free to ask me any question.
Please open other ports.There are lots of conflictions in 80 port!
-
I'm getting a lot of Rejected Proof of work, any idea why is this happening?
-
My 4 core linux64 AMD gets like every single one rejecte d. 8 cores are like 1/3.
-
Okay this is ridiculous, you seem to have nearly 100% hashing power. PLEASE can you release the source this makes our coin look awful.
-
difficulty
(http://64.150.180.15/diff.png)
-
Congrats on getting your pool started - looking good!
Thank you!
-
Why the reject rate is so high?
-
True, some hours ago, I had a lot less rejected shares.
-
Why the reject rate is so high?
same here... tons of rejects.
-
They are stales. Blocks are being found too fast.
-
Seems like once it gets going the rejected goes down?
-
Seriously wtf???
(http://store.picbg.net/pubpic/EC/BC/f623ba95badaecbc.jpg)
This is insane rej rate, like 75% or smth... And how the fudge someone gets 1k hash/min this is ridiculous....
-
Seriously wtf???
...
This is insane rej rate, like 75% or smth... And how the fudge someone gets 1k hash/min this is ridiculous....
FAQ:
- If your HPM is low (< 0.5 hpm), a number of "Rejected" can be very large. This occurs because while you are calculating the share, a new block can appear on the network.
-
Seriously wtf???
...
This is insane rej rate, like 75% or smth... And how the fudge someone gets 1k hash/min this is ridiculous....
FAQ:
- If your HPM is low (< 0.5 hpm), a number of "Rejected" can be very large. This occurs because while you are calculating the share, a new block can appear on the network.
I'm getting at lease 50% rejects and getting ~3.2 HPM
-
Getting an insane amount of rejects on my 0.9hpms now.
-
Getting an insane amount of rejects on my 0.9hpms now.
Block finding speed is CRAZY.
LATEST FOUND BLOCKS
Block Height Date Amount Status
2768 3 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
2767 5 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
2766 7 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
2765 8 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
2764 8 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
1..2 min!!!
-
time between submitting a share and getting a response is as high as 60 seconds sometimes. there's an inefficiency somewhere, perhaps they're only running one instance of a wallet server and it can't handle the getwork load?
-
Are slow machines <4 cores going to get any shares this way. I experience a 100% reject rate.
-
Hey glitchboy, you might want to consider opening up another 2nd server running this pool, seems to be getting a bit bogged down.
-
It would be great to see the pool source and be able to maintain a healthy mining balance by letting many others set up similar pools.
-
20 servers with 10 hpms should at least give me 180+ hpm total on the top miners list. I am only seeing around 55 hpm.
My miners are all working perfect...been running for quite sometime. Where is the rest of my hash power going? >:(
-
It would be great to see the pool source and be able to maintain a healthy mining balance by letting many others set up similar pools.
He has sold the source to a few people. I am looking to buy but not sure what the cost is. He currently has (give or take) 99% hash power which is very dangerous
-
so waited a few blocks more and seems that my 200 hpm is getting 60 hmp on the pool and making almost 1 MMC from 20 servers (32 cores/server)
Going to give it around 10-15 minutes more, if it stays the same going back to xpool.
Update:
HPM on the site is going down, lol sorry but I lost trust in this pool. if the stats are correct then the 1200 HPM miner must have a 1000 servers running.
Back to xpool.
-
Lately getting too many REJECTS :(
-
so waited a few blocks more and seems that my 200 hpm is getting 60 hmp on the pool and making almost 1 MMC from 20 servers (32 cores/server)
Going to give it around 10-15 minutes more, if it stays the same going back to xpool.
Update:
HPM on the site is going down, lol sorry but I lost trust in this pool. if the stats are correct then the 1200 HPM miner must have a 1000 servers running.
Back to xpool.
I trust this, I just imagine its a botnet. If it is a botnet that is approx 6000 bots which is quite easy to get...
-
so waited a few blocks more and seems that my 200 hpm is getting 60 hmp on the pool and making almost 1 MMC from 20 servers (32 cores/server)
Going to give it around 10-15 minutes more, if it stays the same going back to xpool.
Update:
HPM on the site is going down, lol sorry but I lost trust in this pool. if the stats are correct then the 1200 HPM miner must have a 1000 servers running.
Back to xpool.
I trust this, I just imagine its a botnet. If it is a botnet that is approx 6000 bots which is quite easy to get...
I also think it's from a botnet. If you compare the graph from http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html about the difficulty it was raising maybe of one ore more botnets.
-
so waited a few blocks more and seems that my 200 hpm is getting 60 hmp on the pool and making almost 1 MMC from 20 servers (32 cores/server)
Going to give it around 10-15 minutes more, if it stays the same going back to xpool.
Update:
HPM on the site is going down, lol sorry but I lost trust in this pool. if the stats are correct then the 1200 HPM miner must have a 1000 servers running.
Back to xpool.
I trust this, I just imagine its a botnet. If it is a botnet that is approx 6000 bots which is quite easy to get...
I also think it's from a botnet. If you compare the graph from http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html about the difficulty it was raising maybe of one ore more botnets.
It still is quite possible for a person to achieve that kind of speed on EC2, even with a fairly high reject rate. Remember that the higher reject rate doesn't affect faster machines as much as they spend less time on a hash before looking up and acquiring new work.
-
so waited a few blocks more and seems that my 200 hpm is getting 60 hmp on the pool and making almost 1 MMC from 20 servers (32 cores/server)
Going to give it around 10-15 minutes more, if it stays the same going back to xpool.
Update:
HPM on the site is going down, lol sorry but I lost trust in this pool. if the stats are correct then the 1200 HPM miner must have a 1000 servers running.
Back to xpool.
I trust this, I just imagine its a botnet. If it is a botnet that is approx 6000 bots which is quite easy to get...
I also think it's from a botnet. If you compare the graph from http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html about the difficulty it was raising maybe of one ore more botnets.
It still is quite possible for a person to achieve that kind of speed on EC2, even with a fairly high reject rate. Remember that the higher reject rate doesn't affect faster machines as much as they spend less time on a hash before looking up and acquiring new work.
Currently I'm getting 9.5 - 9.8 hpm on cc2.8xlarge instance, so this would be more than 100 instances.. 5-7 accounts with 2 regions each x10 instances in each region? :o
-
How long does it take for blocks to mature?
-
so waited a few blocks more and seems that my 200 hpm is getting 60 hmp on the pool and making almost 1 MMC from 20 servers (32 cores/server)
Going to give it around 10-15 minutes more, if it stays the same going back to xpool.
Update:
HPM on the site is going down, lol sorry but I lost trust in this pool. if the stats are correct then the 1200 HPM miner must have a 1000 servers running.
Back to xpool.
I trust this, I just imagine its a botnet. If it is a botnet that is approx 6000 bots which is quite easy to get...
I also think it's from a botnet. If you compare the graph from http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html about the difficulty it was raising maybe of one ore more botnets.
It still is quite possible for a person to achieve that kind of speed on EC2, even with a fairly high reject rate. Remember that the higher reject rate doesn't affect faster machines as much as they spend less time on a hash before looking up and acquiring new work.
Currently I'm getting 9.5 - 9.8 hpm on cc2.8xlarge instance, so this would be more than 100 instances.. 5-7 accounts with 2 regions each x10 instances in each region? :o
You can request up to 100 of the high-memory (250GB RAM) which has 32 cores (16 physical) per region, although that many never get filled, not even close. However, with just one account, raised limits, and a willingness to pay a pretty penny, it's more than possible. I ran at 900 for a few hours on EC2 until the pool started getting laggy, sending some rejects, and most importantly not providing work fast enough, leaving the miners only using 30-50% of the possible CPU time :(
-
How long does it take for blocks to mature?
Last confirmed block was 2713, mined 8 hours ago.
-
Pool down?
-
How long does it take for blocks to mature?
Last confirmed block was 2713, mined 8 hours ago.
80 Confirmations
Each block should average 6 minutes, so 8 hours sounds right.
-
Any number on how much OP is charging for pool source code?
-
[18:50:41] Stats: 5.448 hash/min
[18:50:44] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
16 core and a lot of rejected, Why?
-
This pool is completely saturated.
Everyone is mining on it. It is getting very bad.
-
I PROBABLY have found out what causes high percentage of rejects. I'm working on a fix. The service can sometimes be unavailable for a few minutes. Sorry about that.
-
I PROBABLY have found out what causes high percentage of rejects. I'm working on a fix. The service can sometimes be unavailable for a few minutes. Sorry about that.
Realy very high rejects .
I am waiting fix.
good luck
-
I PROBABLY have found out what causes high percentage of rejects. I'm working on a fix. The service can sometimes be unavailable for a few minutes. Sorry about that.
Realy very high rejects .
I am waiting fix.
good luck
+1 & +1
It's strange how it's my cloud servers that are being rejected, low CPU versions especially. My desktop CPU never gets rejections.
-
glitchboy sent a private message. I am try another port.
10 minute result 14 accept 1 reject.
I think very soon fix.
-
everything is now good.
low reject.
-
I have problems installing the mmcminer on CentOS. Can seomebody help me with the comand lines?
Thank you
-
I have problems installing the mmcminer on CentOS. Can seomebody help me with the comand lines?
Thank you
I am not centos admin but maybe work.
Try:
sudo yum -y groupinstall "Development Tools"
sudo yum -y install git libcurl-devel python-devel screen rsync
git clone https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer
cd mmcminer
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native" CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native"
make
./minerd
-
I PROBABLY have found out what causes high percentage of rejects. I'm working on a fix. The service can sometimes be unavailable for a few minutes. Sorry about that.
excellent work!
-
I PROBABLY have found out what causes high percentage of rejects. I'm working on a fix. The service can sometimes be unavailable for a few minutes. Sorry about that.
excellent work!
No, I'm still working..
-
I PROBABLY have found out what causes high percentage of rejects. I'm working on a fix. The service can sometimes be unavailable for a few minutes. Sorry about that.
excellent work!
No, I'm still working..
Well done on finding the bugs, if you have any questions or need someone to talk to I'm here. I know just talking to someone about code issues normally lets you work them out!
-
any plan to support win32?thank you.
-
any plan to support win32?thank you.
Soon! Thx!
-
It seems that all miners is in this pool. This is not very good.
-
i have a very high rejection rate on all my computers and servers. looks like 70% rejection . :(
-
Hello everyone. I have a lot of computers are 32-bit operating system, reinstall the system workload is too great, who can give me a win32 version of mining applications, thank you, Merry Christmas.
-
Who can give me a win32 version of MMC mine digging applications, awards 10MMC.
-
@glitchboy
Can you please add Difficultly Level/Chart on site's main page?
Rejection rate has once again increased :(
-
Bit of a problem:
XRamPool recently mined 2 blocks: 2928 and 2916
These blocks are also listed on the MMCPool homepage.
I know that the 2 blocks mined by XRamPool are not orphan blocks (the transaction log says so).
Can this be checked?
-
I have problems installing the mmcminer on CentOS. Can seomebody help me with the comand lines?
Thank you
I am not centos admin but maybe work.
Try:
sudo yum -y groupinstall "Development Tools"
sudo yum -y install git libcurl-devel python-devel screen rsync
git clone https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer
cd mmcminer
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native" CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native"
make
./minerd
Thanks bro! it works
-
Hmm, solo mininh last night with result of zero coins >:(
Now the variant Windows x64 results in:
Found solution -
Found share ...
Stats: 3.144 hash/min
PROFF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
and so on....
What is wrong? Any ideas?
-
Pool have prolem ? I got many many time PROFF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected
-
Bit of a problem:
XRamPool recently mined 2 blocks: 2928 and 2916
These blocks are also listed on the MMCPool homepage.
I know that the 2 blocks mined by XRamPool are not orphan blocks (the transaction log says so).
Can this be checked?
Same, not orphan:
getblockhash 2928
00005de39452470a5868742563d0fe0ca2ec5b0ff4258666792833d9a8a54fb0
getblock 00005de39452470a5868742563d0fe0ca2ec5b0ff4258666792833d9a8a54fb0
{
"hash" : "00005de39452470a5868742563d0fe0ca2ec5b0ff4258666792833d9a8a54fb0",
"confirmations" : 34,
"size" : 16781,
"height" : 2928,
"version" : 2,
"merkleroot" : "9fcfbb19629168714d55bc52bcf9c5bbfb682aceb0b1483a3553c3dc0ae56aee",
"tx" : [
"769c2eb30e036ba60406ef777fdfe1087733b1017b7a579b69f4aec47e2443db",
"6235b8afa217ca6ae9a84d8c8dde7fafb85ca7202213d0104ba08eb8d305486f",
"25293c8b73c95908270eadae575573c9c0f4af3823f5ff2dd6c173924c3f8feb",
"768f8db24939fe9b31f060d422ba98830e9124b0394b636b428a9b2866ce255b",
"eece9fcb5127217f187624c3cf74b034be043ea048c4ccf0610542565d3b32ad",
"6c1f7dd9862c9a02301a6bddb96e1b23adc01c441410a0cbeee4e82af01aaca3",
"89bc6216177448ae38084f24c10badbc65907b0ec088c01ad4ca445e584ff5a7",
"42d7be3e536dbd574664409682664c015ed27f5a11dbdd75488e4c013997cff3",
"1476c15829c6fc1e1368c35c4ed8e0777d4fea3278b401c7a4da7662f6e32d30",
"4f1af3e4b620e2c508c5138df8be381d5d447f5c9065d7523e69d0b48e86f98b",
"fce27c5f7f6681505210ec9ac4dea0f830cc096ae6e39836ab3e0524e2b4e5ff",
"45416062cb624fb4b1887e3fd9e311116a1e767013265aacc631602f5142820c"
],
"time" : 1388124254,
"nonce" : 0,
"bits" : "1f009344",
"difficulty" : 0.00002652,
"previousblockhash" : "00002a521a8b049d4483d7838d5935e432d76f5e753bee1bfde0bcc47a09fabb",
"nextblockhash" : "00008b15b5f5a013c886dccfa242ff0f3c1e9bf57cfc6992365a3031400057be"
}
gettransaction 769c2eb30e036ba60406ef777fdfe1087733b1017b7a579b69f4aec47e2443db
{
"amount" : 0.00000000,
"confirmations" : 35,
"generated" : true,
"blockhash" : "00005de39452470a5868742563d0fe0ca2ec5b0ff4258666792833d9a8a54fb0",
"blockindex" : 0,
"blocktime" : 1388124254,
"txid" : "769c2eb30e036ba60406ef777fdfe1087733b1017b7a579b69f4aec47e2443db",
"time" : 1388124254,
"timereceived" : 1388124274,
"details" : [
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "MAAHQ5Wkf9LrDu63i222M72y2EuvSLpF5x",
"category" : "immature",
"amount" : 266.00240000
}
]
}
WTF? :(
-
Bit of a problem:
XRamPool recently mined 2 blocks: 2928 and 2916
These blocks are also listed on the MMCPool homepage.
I know that the 2 blocks mined by XRamPool are not orphan blocks (the transaction log says so).
Can this be checked?
fork ??
glitchboy can you create other pools 2-3 ? maybe mmc community donate for serveral vps for pools.. and not will be 99% of power on the one pool....
-
Bit of a problem:
XRamPool recently mined 2 blocks: 2928 and 2916
These blocks are also listed on the MMCPool homepage.
I know that the 2 blocks mined by XRamPool are not orphan blocks (the transaction log says so).
Can this be checked?
fork ??
Looks like both pools are showing the same time stamps so assuming these are the same blocks, not a fork, just that one or other pool is misidentifying them as their own. Who owns the reward address inside the block . . That should be conclusive.
-
Anyone compiled mmcminer in Archlinux? could tell me what packages are required?
-
Give me more rejected shares! It's only 90% now.
-
How many confirmations are needed for a payment? My first payment was 17 hours ago and I have nothing in my wallet till now
-
When you reach little more than 1 MMC (in Current balance), you will get MMC to your wallet.
-
guys new pool indevelopment :P
http://www.mmc-pool.com
-
very much reject rate! 50%
-
Anyone compiled mmcminer in Archlinux? could tell me what packages are required?
(64bit only) here's my PKGBUILD https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:aguswinata/cpuminer-mmcminer/PKGBUILD?expand=1
feels free to modify.
binary available at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/aguswinata/Arch_Extra/
-
When you reach little more than 1 MMC (in Current balance), you will get MMC to your wallet.
I already have 7.2245 MMC paid in the pool but I received nothing...
-
Anyone compiled mmcminer in Archlinux? could tell me what packages are required?
(64bit only) here's my PKGBUILD https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:aguswinata/cpuminer-mmcminer/PKGBUILD?expand=1
feels free to modify.
binary available at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/aguswinata/Arch_Extra/
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating compat/Makefile
config.status: creating compat/jansson/Makefile
config.status: creating cpuminer-config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
configure: WARNING: cache variable ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_value contains a newline
Makefile:251: *** falta un separador. Alto.
==> ERROR: Se produjo un error en build().
Cancelando...
Thanks anyway!
-
Too many bot owners are connecting to the server. But it wasn't intended for such a BIG load. In short, I'm going to double the pool's capacity SOON and these problems will disappear.
-
Hello everyone. I have a lot of computers are 32-bit operating system, reinstall the system workload is too great, who can give me a win32 version of mining applications, thank you, Merry Christmas.
win32 version mmcminer for this pool
https://mega.co.nz/#!WZZ2SYKC!cQ3YuTi4IiuVpv5c-FHXWR8YqbZzH_AlrXjkUacodWw
-
Adding the overall pool hpm can be usefull...
-
Too many bot owners are connecting to the server. But it wasn't intended for such a BIG load. In short, I'm going to double the pool's capacity SOON and these problems will disappear.
Ban low hpm :)
You need load balancer.
Load in Database?
Load in Nginx?
Load in pushpool?
Load in bitcoin?
-
You have your HPM in miner. Total HPM whole pool and network would be usefull. But the most usefull thing is reject rate the same as then, when difficult was on level 0.000008/9.
-
Hello everyone. I have a lot of computers are 32-bit operating system, reinstall the system workload is too great, who can give me a win32 version of mining applications, thank you, Merry Christmas.
win32 version mmcminer for this pool
https://mega.co.nz/#!nIwDSawS!fuxOszJi0_Fu8VUG4gcxmTVZhbRvawBWe6Dzjf0q1NM
Hello, friends. This file can't be download, can provide download links in addition it? Thank you.
-
Hello everyone. I have a lot of computers are 32-bit operating system, reinstall the system workload is too great, who can give me a win32 version of mining applications, thank you, Merry Christmas.
win32 version mmcminer for this pool
https://mega.co.nz/#!nIwDSawS!fuxOszJi0_Fu8VUG4gcxmTVZhbRvawBWe6Dzjf0q1NM
Hello, friends. This file can't be download, can provide download links in addition it? Thank you.
now try..
https://mega.co.nz/#!WZZ2SYKC!cQ3YuTi4IiuVpv5c-FHXWR8YqbZzH_AlrXjkUacodWw
-
That's not good for you or us. Couldn't you filter out ips making less than .3 hpm? I am sure you could do some reporting to figure out what the sweet spot is.
Too many bot owners are connecting to the server. But it wasn't intended for such a BIG load. In short, I'm going to double the pool's capacity SOON and these problems will disappear.
-
0,3783 per hour, but it should be at least 0,58375 - 3770k @4,2 3.6hpm when using computer. God bless hash reject!
-
Hello everyone. I have a lot of computers are 32-bit operating system, reinstall the system workload is too great, who can give me a win32 version of mining applications, thank you, Merry Christmas.
win32 version mmcminer for this pool
https://mega.co.nz/#!nIwDSawS!fuxOszJi0_Fu8VUG4gcxmTVZhbRvawBWe6Dzjf0q1NM
Hello, friends. This file can't be download, can provide download links in addition it? Thank you.
now try..
https://mega.co.nz/#!WZZ2SYKC!cQ3YuTi4IiuVpv5c-FHXWR8YqbZzH_AlrXjkUacodWw
Thank you very much.
-
Pretty sure payments are pretty delayed at this point.
-
Too many bot owners are connecting to the server. But it wasn't intended for such a BIG load. In short, I'm going to double the pool's capacity SOON and these problems will disappear.
Out of curiosity, if you don't mind, those big bot owners, guys with over 300hpm, could you confirm if they are mostly botnets owners or using huge server farms or cloud computing? I mean, if they have like 500hpm and like 1000+ miners each one getting less than 1hpm with frequent disconnections, probably it's a botnet, but if they have most of their miners doing similar hpm between 3hpm to 8hpm it's probably a server farm, or if they have few connections doing like 10hpm each sounds like aws instances ...
-
Who can give me a win32 version of MMC mine digging applications, awards 10MMC.
my address MVTEcnoTrUAeYrd3yzXm3nd4S73yACDtMa
-
http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388160033-clip-6kb.png?nocache=1)
http://mmcpool.com/
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388160064-clip-12kb.png?nocache=1)
:o
-
http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388160033-clip-6kb.png?nocache=1)
http://mmcpool.com/
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388160064-clip-12kb.png?nocache=1)
:o
Is not the first time. Why?
-
Too many rejects :( :(
-
Too many bot owners are connecting to the server. But it wasn't intended for such a BIG load. In short, I'm going to double the pool's capacity SOON and these problems will disappear.
Too many rejects again?
You remove old share in server?
-
http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388160033-clip-6kb.png?nocache=1)
http://mmcpool.com/
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388160064-clip-12kb.png?nocache=1)
:o
Is not the first time. Why?
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
-
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
XRamPool is on the working fork.
If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though :) Then it would have the working fork.
3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.
Could this be considered false advertising? :)
-
oh god what the fuck -its been an hour since a block has been found :/
-
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
XRamPool is on the working fork.
If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though :) Then it would have the working fork.
3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.
Could this be considered false advertising? :)
Valid block 3026 as in you can spend it and the network will confirm?
-
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
XRamPool is on the working fork.
If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though :) Then it would have the working fork.
3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.
Could this be considered false advertising? :)
Valid block 3026 as in you can spend it and the network will confirm?
yes, if I look at the transaction log, the type is "immature", not "orphan"... trust me, it is valid.
-
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
XRamPool is on the working fork.
If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though :) Then it would have the working fork.
3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.
Could this be considered false advertising? :)
Valid block 3026 as in you can spend it and the network will confirm?
yes, if I look at the transaction log, the type is "immature", not "orphan"... trust me, it is valid.
Care to send 1 satoshi from it somewhere and post the tx id?
-
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
XRamPool is on the working fork.
If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though :) Then it would have the working fork.
3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.
Could this be considered false advertising? :)
Valid block 3026 as in you can spend it and the network will confirm?
yes, if I look at the transaction log, the type is "immature", not "orphan"... trust me, it is valid.
Care to send 1 satoshi from it somewhere and post the tx id?
It's not confirmed, but I can post all of the transaction ID
-
oh god what the fuck -its been an hour since a block has been found :/
How is that even possible? Somethings up.
-
I pulled half of my server cluster down
will wait an hour more -if I dont see a few blocks in bursts-will pull the rest also down
-
I pulled half of my server cluster down
will wait an hour more -if I dont see a few blocks in bursts-will pull the rest also down
Working now.....3029.
-
just found the bug now with the blocks... XRamPool's block number is off... nothing is wrong otherwise.
-
Yep - I put my server cluster back on for the moment
-
Rejects are very high atm.
-
we all didn't get the MMC from MMCPOOL.COM why?
-
we all didn't get the MMC from MMCPOOL.COM why?
Good question. Since 4 hours no more payouts. I have changed to http://mmc-pool.com
-
how about the mmc-pool.com ?
-
how about the mmc-pool.com ?
It works very good for me. 0.51% only rejected for my workers. 4.67% complete pool rejection rate. I have 5 workers running. 4x~10h/m and 1x~3h/m
-
but it hasn't blocks now!
-
mmcpool.com does not pay men about 6 hours, what happenning? :-X
-
how about the mmc-pool.com ?
It works very good for me. 0.51% only rejected for my workers. 4.67% complete pool rejection rate. I have 5 workers running. 4x~10h/m and 1x~3h/m
but it hasn't blocks now!
Because it is a new pool and need more hash power. Just switch. The best thing is no fees but you can setup donations. I have a setup done of 0.5% donation :) For this pool here in this thread which actually don't pay since 6 hours you have to pay 3.6 % :o
But at the moment mmc-pool.com is down for maintenance https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1703.15
-
mmcpool.com does not pay men about 6 hours, what happenning? :-X
+1
Whats happend?
-
Payout jam :D
I received payout a minute ago! 8)
-
the website show the payment history,but my wallet still didn't receive it. why?
-
You should wait for next block.
-
Pool runs like a charm now. Thx!!
-
¨best pool. ,, but can you see 1400 hpm too ?? :D :D :D :D :D :D amazing botnet
-
do you have set the limit of connects from one wallet address or an ip address. i have over 100 computers,use win7 32bit,a lot of computers allways disconnect from our poor. diappered as i shoud ned Authenticate,and should wait for 10 Second
-
do you have set the limit of connects from one wallet address or an ip address. i have over 100 computers,use win7 32bit,a lot of computers allways disconnect from our poor. diappered as i shoud ned Authenticate,and should wait for 10 Second
Win32? Which miner are you using? MMCPool has x64 miner only.
-
Rejected rate rising...
-
do you have set the limit of connects from one wallet address or an ip address. i have over 100 computers,use win7 32bit,a lot of computers allways disconnect from our poor. diappered as i shoud ned Authenticate,and should wait for 10 Second
Win32? Which miner are you using? MMCPool has x64 miner only.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1630.msg18653#msg18653
-
Rejected rate rising...
Blocks are appearing too fast... Network difficuty will rise soon! :o
LATEST FOUND BLOCKS
Block Height Date Amount Status
3216 4 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
3215 5 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
3214 6 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
3213 7 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
3212 8 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
3211 9 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
3210 11 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
3209 12 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
3208 13 minutes ago 266.00 IMMATURE
-
do you have set the limit of connects from one wallet address or an ip address. i have over 100 computers,use win7 32bit,a lot of computers allways disconnect from our poor. diappered as i shoud ned Authenticate,and should wait for 10 Second
Win32? Which miner are you using? MMCPool has x64 miner only.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1630.msg18653#msg18653
Thanks :)
-
¨best pool. ,, but can you see 1400 hpm too ?? :D :D :D :D :D :D amazing botnet
Yeap 8)
TOP 50 MINERS
Username Est HPM
MFS... 1319.76
MWj... 1215.04
MVG... 1052.39
...
-
Difficulty: 0.00004..... fuck.
-
On one of my accounts it says 34 paid but i have only received 23 to that address in my wallet. Is it that delayed or is something wrong?
-
the website show the payment history,but my wallet still didn't receive it. why?
On one of my accounts it says 34 paid but i have only received 23 to that address in my wallet. Is it that delayed or is something wrong?
You should wait for next block.
-
@glitchboy ,, could you add speed? i mean when u look at "CHECK YOUR EARNINGS" click submit and now on the left u got comfimed etc.. Dont you wanna make speed meter here too ? :D
Thank you.
This could help me a lot if all is running etc. 8)
-
@glitchboy ,, could you add speed? i mean when u look at "CHECK YOUR EARNINGS" click submit and now on the left u got comfimed etc.. Dont you wanna make speed meter here too ? :D
Thank you.
This could help me a lot if all is running etc. 8)
Ok, I'll add it. Thanks!
-
What happens with abandoned balances?
I mean if a client mines a small amount, but not enough to meet a payout threshold, and then abandons it - so no activity for a month or so.
-
What happens with abandoned balances?
I mean if a client mines a small amount, but not enough to meet a payout threshold, and then abandons it - so no activity for a month or so.
Nothing (yet). I'll implement this. After holidays.
-
What happens with abandoned balances?
I mean if a client mines a small amount, but not enough to meet a payout threshold, and then abandons it - so no activity for a month or so.
Nothing (yet). I'll implement this. After holidays.
Thanks - also, if there is any way to lower the payout threshold for smaller miners, or for first payout, I think that would be a good idea - smaller and new miners will be encouraged by a fast payout - it helps them to see it working and creates positive feedback for them, encouraging them to stick with it.
-
Anyone here have any luck getting either an SSEx or AVX optimized miner running for MMC?
Anyone compiled mmcminer in Archlinux? could tell me what packages are required?
(64bit only) here's my PKGBUILD https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:aguswinata/cpuminer-mmcminer/PKGBUILD?expand=1
feels free to modify.
binary available at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/aguswinata/Arch_Extra/
-
@glitchboy ,, could you add speed? i mean when u look at "CHECK YOUR EARNINGS" click submit and now on the left u got comfimed etc.. Dont you wanna make speed meter here too ? :D
Thank you.
This could help me a lot if all is running etc. 8)
Ok, I'll add it. Thanks!
Big thanks, ! :D :D ;D
-
Can anybody help me in starting this up i dont know how to change demo account :( and threads.
:-[ :-[ using windows btw 64 bit
-
Miner improvement- in linux cpus drop to zero for a few seconds, sometimes for much more. I am guessing it is polling for new work. Any way to improve so cpu is always busy? I can run two processes at once with cores double loaded but I am getting more rejects.
-
Can anybody help me in starting this up i dont know how to change demo account :( and threads.
:-[ :-[ using windows btw 64 bit
http://mmcwiki.com/mmcminer_install_windows64_mmcpool
-
Anyone here have any luck getting either an SSEx or AVX optimized miner running for MMC?
Anyone compiled mmcminer in Archlinux? could tell me what packages are required?
(64bit only) here's my PKGBUILD https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:aguswinata/cpuminer-mmcminer/PKGBUILD?expand=1
feels free to modify.
binary available at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/aguswinata/Arch_Extra/
Miner is using OpenSSL for AES, so you rather need optimized OpenSSL in your system for that.
-
why i cant get any payment?
I check my wallet address on the website,it show 5 MMC has been paid.
-
How to build it for Ubuntu?
# Install dependencies
sudo apt-get install build-essential autoconf libcurl4-openssl-dev
# Copy to local disk source code
git clone https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer
# Configure and make
cd mmcminer/
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native" CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -mtune=native" ./configure
make
Sorry can you explain the instruction for Ubutnu ? When I make cd mmcminer/ it says mmcminer isn't a folder.
run .autogen.sh first
-
why i cant get any payment?
I check my wallet address on the website,it show 5 MMC has been paid.
Search wallet adress http://www.chainbrowser.com/memorycoin/ you see transaction?
Maybe the problem is with wallet client.
-
All right,i restarted the wallet client,and got the transactions,it seem the client has been 'sleep'!
-
DDOS attack!
-
DDOS attack!
So website is down, but miner continues to chug along... I thought maybe you were doing some website maintenance, like maybe the hash/min thing or something.
-
DDOS attack! (again) :(
-
I'm ordering DDoS protection now.
-
cannot download the miner setup? :-/ please fix m8 thanku
-
cannot download the miner setup? :-/ please fix m8 thanku
Fixed. Sorry!
-
DDoS protection enabled.
-
Great Thank you !. /what about speed ? / ;D
-
I'm waiting since 5 days to receive my coins and nothing yet. Is there any issue with the payments?
-
Definitely no ! I have payments when it reachs 1 every time ! Maybe your speed is slow .. ?
-
I'm waiting since 5 days to receive my coins and nothing yet. Is there any issue with the payments?
Address?
-
Great Thank you !. /what about speed ? / ;D
Added! Thanks.
-
best pool. Thank you for that.
;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
-
I'm waiting since 5 days to receive my coins and nothing yet. Is there any issue with the payments?
I don`t have any problem with payment on this pool.
-
I'm waiting since 5 days to receive my coins and nothing yet. Is there any issue with the payments?
I don`t have any problem with payment on this pool.
Yeap!
Offtopic: Happy NY 2014! 8)
-
sorry im noobe in mcc like itself :P
i have so many rejected proof of work in my miners, is there anything wrong with them ?
or its normal
-
whats your hashrate speed ?
-
whats your hashrate speed ?
using 9 PC's now, on 6 of them speed is 0.93hpm and 3 others are around 0.43 x_X
i get rejected on all of them
i think i should stop mining with those 3 slow miners to reduce them till i get a solution for others x_X
-
Somewhat at a loss here, I setup MMC-Pool per wiki and all I am getting is 401 errors.
I changed my wallet address to my blockchain but still nothing.
Anything else I should be looking for when I see 401 errors?
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 10 seconds
I also tried to re-download the mmcminer client however the link appears to be dead.
Hoping to get this working on a small machine before I change over 4P system from F@H to this.
-
Somewhat at a loss here, I setup MMC-Pool per wiki and all I am getting is 401 errors.
I changed my wallet address to my blockchain but still nothing.
Anything else I should be looking for when I see 401 errors?
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 10 seconds
I also tried to re-download the mmcminer client however the link appears to be dead.
Ouch! Fixed! :-[
Hoping to get this working on a small machine before I change over 4P system from F@H to this.
Error 401 means that you use invalid wallet address as username. What's your address?
-
new tutorial : mmcminer install windows32 (mmcpool.com) (http://mmcwiki.com/mmcminer_install_windows32_mmcpool)
-
new tutorial : mmcminer install windows32 (mmcpool.com) (http://mmcwiki.com/mmcminer_install_windows32_mmcpool)
This is actually the one I was using.
-
Somewhat at a loss here, I setup MMC-Pool per wiki and all I am getting is 401 errors.
I changed my wallet address to my blockchain but still nothing.
Anything else I should be looking for when I see 401 errors?
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 10 seconds
I also tried to re-download the mmcminer client however the link appears to be dead.
Ouch! Fixed! :-[
Hoping to get this working on a small machine before I change over 4P system from F@H to this.
Error 401 means that you use invalid wallet address as username. What's your address?
15N5jUVniiABxPwAJop3DiKP86g3fd9uuc
-
15N5jUVniiABxPwAJop3DiKP86g3fd9uuc
It's a Bitcoin address. You should provide MemoryCoin 2.0 address.
-
15N5jUVniiABxPwAJop3DiKP86g3fd9uuc
It's a Bitcoin address. You should provide MemoryCoin 2.0 address.
Sigh, I grabbed the wrong one. Well at least it was a simple fix for a bonehead move on my part.
Thanks~
-
Somewhat at a loss here, I setup MMC-Pool per wiki and all I am getting is 401 errors.
I changed my wallet address to my blockchain but still nothing.
Anything else I should be looking for when I see 401 errors?
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 10 seconds
I also tried to re-download the mmcminer client however the link appears to be dead.
Ouch! Fixed! :-[
Hoping to get this working on a small machine before I change over 4P system from F@H to this.
Error 401 means that you use invalid wallet address as username. What's your address?
15N5jUVniiABxPwAJop3DiKP86g3fd9uuc
Wallets.
http://mmcwiki.com/#wallet
-
Somewhat at a loss here, I setup MMC-Pool per wiki and all I am getting is 401 errors.
I changed my wallet address to my blockchain but still nothing.
Anything else I should be looking for when I see 401 errors?
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 10 seconds
I also tried to re-download the mmcminer client however the link appears to be dead.
Ouch! Fixed! :-[
Hoping to get this working on a small machine before I change over 4P system from F@H to this.
Error 401 means that you use invalid wallet address as username. What's your address?
15N5jUVniiABxPwAJop3DiKP86g3fd9uuc
Wallets.
http://mmcwiki.com/#wallet
Yeah that was my bad, I grabbed the wrong wallet code (Have a few). Everything is up and running. Will change my 4P over probably next week or something.
Thanks again for the assistance.
-
new tutorial : mmcminer install windows32 (mmcpool.com) (http://mmcwiki.com/mmcminer_install_windows32_mmcpool)
what's the difference?
-
-----> [MMC][IMPORTANT] Miners heads up! (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1898.0)
-
new tutorial : mmcminer install windows32 (mmcpool.com) (http://mmcwiki.com/mmcminer_install_windows32_mmcpool)
what's the difference?
This for windows 32bit version.
-
Is it allowed to make multiple miners under same e-wallet adress?
I know some other coins allow ADRESS.worker1
Also, I do not understand why it shows that proof of work gets approved, but at the 'backoffice' nothing changes for hours.
-
Also, I do not understand why it shows that proof of work gets approved, but at the 'backoffice' nothing changes for hours.
There are currently no statistics on how much data you have sent from the last block. Therefore, you just need to wait until the pool finds the next block and you will be able to see the results of your work. If the miner says "Accepted", it means that the pool has saved your share and it won't be lost.
-
Is longpoll supported on this pool?
-
It shows that my payment was sent, however i didnt receive anything... :o
It has passed over 2 hours already.
-
It shows that my payment was sent, however i didnt receive anything... :o
It has passed over 2 hours already.
Have you looked up the transaction id on block explorer?
-
It shows that my payment was sent, however i didnt receive anything... :o
It has passed over 2 hours already.
Have you looked up the transaction id on block explorer?
This is the reply I got from pool administrator:
Hello!
Do you use mmc-wallet.com? Looks like mmc-wallet.com and chainbrowser.com skipped many blocks recently:
http://imgur.com/apb9Clj (blocks 5070-5088) You transaction has been included to the block #5076.
You should contact a support of mmc-wallet.com.
-
Did you get reply from mmc-wallet.com?
-
Is longpoll supported on this pool?
Not yet. I'll implement it soon.
-
Great to know about longpool, PM me please when you have it ready for testing.
Another technical question.
Your pool advertising X-Roll-NTime support in responses. Does it support it as per specification? Does X-Roll-NTime value of 500 seconds set with a purpose?
I am asking that because of block target is 6 minutes, thus 360 seconds, and setting up rollntime to 500 seem a bit too high for me. Am I wrong with this assumption?
yvg1900
-
Your pool advertising X-Roll-NTime support in responses. Does it support it as per specification? Does X-Roll-NTime value of 500 seconds set with a purpose?
I am asking that because of block target is 6 minutes, thus 360 seconds, and setting up rollntime to 500 seem a bit too high for me. Am I wrong with this assumption?
Current implementation of MMCMiner doesn't use it. I forgot to remove it from the server's response. Removed.
-
Does that also mean that pool is strict on the value of nTime in mined header? (means if I want for example every mining thread to run its own work shall I obey rule of getting work from server for every individual thread, or I am free to select nonce/nTime on miner side?)
yvg1900
-
*** ATTENTION
Maintenance.. The pool will be back soon. Sorry!
DONE!
-
Please, make auto payouts limit lower. 0.25 MMC.
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
To mine MemoryCoin with yam M7j use provided miner config template named yam-mmc.cfg as a base, check readme.txt for more details.
yam M7j optimised for mining MMC on CPUs with AES-NI support and has 5 different algo variations for HT, non-HT and GPU friendly setups.
yam M7j miner now supports PTS mining at beeeeer and includes fix for Win2003 and other older 64bit systems. Check readme.txt for details.
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
yvg1900
-
Amazing - I've got an i7 3700 that was seeing 4 hpm at 100% with 1GB
Now, it's running with 6 cores - 75% with 6GB and it's nearly 9HPM.
I imagine that if switch off hyperthreading and run it with 4cores at 4GB I'll get the best results and upto 12HPM?
I'm baffled, amazed, grateful and awed. What did you do? How is this possible? Can the same optimization be made for GPUs or have you put CPUs back on an equal footing long term?
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
Works it with stratum too?
I have pool, but no clients yet :)
But if M7j works, I don't must create it.
-
FT,
There are several different algo variations.
av=1 is HT-friendly. On 4-core with HT you shall run it 8 threads and 1Gb RAM per thread.
av=3 is for non-HT. If you plan to run 4 threads on HT mach, ensure that you select av=3. The best is if you can pin your threads to cores to unlock full potential of av=3.
av=2 is mediocre. In between 1 and 3, but you may give it a try.
av=4 is for older AMD CPUs, ppl reported this was the best in some cases.
av=5 is targeting Atoms in 64-bit mode, has completely different mem usage. Very slow one, but still faster than original one.
As of GPUs, I will evaluate possibilities, but as soon as GPUs are in the game, I will definitely jump in to be on par with this.
This is equally probable that GPUs will have some bottlenecks, but we shall see.
There are still some more optimizations that are possible for CPU, I even did not collect enough statistics to optimize memory access patterns in full, just added some basic stuff. There is equal chance that doubling memory per thread may also bring performance gain, besides it looks completely strange.
yvg1900
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
Works it with stratum too?
I have pool, but no clients yet :)
But if M7j works, I don't must create it.
At the moment not, but I will check if I can support that fast.
Any technical specifics related you this particular pool?
Tbh, I prefer to have a reference miner that uses stratum protocol to see what you feel proper client side support, but I have stratum support on the list for other coins, so it can be in line with that.
yvg1900
-
MMC Agg. SPM: 7.278, HPM: 10.406; Rnds C/I: 41/16, Don. C/I: 15/0; Cfg/Thr SPM: 7.278/0.9757, Cfg/Thr HPM: 10.407/1.3009 56 rnds AV=1, ART=46121
is this really over 10HPM :o first cpu miner 3.4 HPM then 4.5 HPM and now over 10? :o what is happening in here
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pnsjzmxh6o35n0j/Screenshot%202014-01-12%2023.10.52.png why those HPM numbers are same all the time? what is SPM? what numbers i should watch now?
-
Easiest way to see if this is real HPM number is to point one instance to separate address at mmcpool and look at HPM estimation.
SPM is Solutions Per Minute, which shall converge to the HPM on the long round.
Actually, HPM is not Hash Per Minute, but Hashing Round Per Minute.
HPM numbers are measured only over COMPLETE (non-interrupted) rounds, which is the WORST case. They change only when number of complete rounds change.
Anyway, from your statistics number of rounds is still very small.
yvg1900
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
To mine MemoryCoin with yam M7j use provided miner config template named yam-mmc.cfg as a base, check readme.txt for more details.
yam M7j optimised for mining MMC on CPUs with AES-NI support and has 5 different algo variations for HT, non-HT and GPU friendly setups.
yam M7j miner now supports PTS mining at beeeeer and includes fix for Win2003 and other older 64bit systems. Check readme.txt for details.
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
yvg1900
A big WOW and a big THANKS!
-
yvg1900, thank you!
--------------------------------
Hey all, I'm happy to announce the release of the GPU miner for MMCPool.com!
Download now: http://dl.mmcpool.com/gpu/mmcpool-gpu-miner-windows.zip (Windows, BETA!)
Please, share your feedback.
-
.
NICE CPU MINER!!!
Any data from AMD A8 / A10 users out there?!?!
yvg1900, thank you!
--------------------------------
Hey all, I'm happy to announce the release of the GPU miner for MMCPool.com!
Download now: http://dl.mmcpool.com/gpu/mmcpool-gpu-miner-windows.zip (Windows, BETA!)
Please, share your feedback.
Thats great!
Any comparisons against 1gh GPU miner?
-
Another new miner,
Big stat, Most better performance:
and more surprise
Will mine 2 rounds for miner developers to support development of the next version
Share found while mining for developers
How much time will be rounds :-?
-
Report from my test machine -
i7 3700 / Hyperthreading enabled / 8GB
Running 7 processes / av1 / 7GB
9.585 HPM - 300% improvement over bundled miner, with CPU cycles to spare. Wow.
*edit - huge page support enabled for this test, but 2 threads complaining they cannot use - assume I need a different OS or more memory.
-
8 GB is a strict minimum for huge pages to work. You need more RAM. In the meantime I decided to implement some more perf opts, but it will take some time. Every next opt is more complex than prev one.
Anyway, enjoy :-) As promised, it closes gap with GPU miners a lot.
Follow @yvg1900 on Twitter to get updates on performance mining software
-
Yvg, good work guy as always!
It works for me but it allocate 1Gb memory per thread so in my scenario (24 thread, 12gb) I can only start 8 thread option and gives me less performace that the 24 threads old miner version.
Is there any chance to set 3 threads work on the same 1gb memory blocks?
I think I can get an huge performance increase if it is possible.
Thanks anyway for awesome work!
-
..... 300% improvement over bundled miner, with CPU cycles to spare. Wow.
*edit - huge page support enabled for this test, but 2 threads complaining they cannot use - assume I need a different OS or more memory.
here too, still cant run it on windows2008 r2 8GB ram/ i7 950 it gets freezes and close.
but running it on my laptop windows 8.1 / i5 3230M / 8GB ram (just for test :P )
was : with 4 threads: Stats: 1.237 hash/min
IS: HPM: 3.545/0.8862
8 GB is a strict minimum for huge pages to work. You need more RAM. In the meantime I decided to implement some more perf opts, but it will take some time. Every next opt is more complex than prev one.
Anyway, enjoy :-) As promised, it closes gap with GPU miners a lot.
Follow @yvg1900 on Twitter to get updates on performance mining software
extremely fast now, rock on yvg ;)
going to replace all miners with new one
will post more stat with more CPUs soon :D
-
in linux hugepages switch on:
echo always > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
-
With the new coin miner fully justifies its name. :)
-
It like others,how to set parameter ,I want use less GPU ,my gpu 3G RAM when I open MMC gpu miner,I can't do anythings else
,also I can use computer to do other things
-
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Platform: Intel(R) OpenCL
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Device: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Total device memory: 1624 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Maximum buffer size: 406 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Cannot use the device! Maximum buffer size is less than 1024
MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Platform: NVIDIA CUDA
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Device: GeForce 610M
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Total device memory: 2048 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Maximum buffer size: 512 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Cannot use the device! Maximum buffer size is less than 1024
MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU2] Device not found
13:51:31.013 Started 0 miner threads
nooo :'(
-
MMC Agg. SPM: 0.000, HPM: ?; Rnds C/I: 0/0, Don. C/I: 0/0; Cfg/Thr SPM: 0.000/?,
Cfg/Thr HPM: ?/? 0 rnds AV=1, ART=?
work.mmcpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
can nyone help it run ???
cpu is 100% in user, but mmcpool shows miner no t connected and stat is like above after 20 min
it is win2012 / AMD K10 / 12GB ram
edit: i tested all optimized versions, no success yet x_X
-
Info you provided is simply not enough to assist you.
How many threads are you running? Is AES-NI enabled? What are compat check messages and pool connection states? How much RAM is free before miner start? Is hugepages enabled or has warning?
-
sorry, was still testing.
there 8 threads using
all 12gb ram were free
hugpages enabled/disabled - no difference
and now, sth new :D miner doesnt start anymore with aesni on anymore
and with off shows the same msg X_X
i tested on all my win2008/2012 servers
all have the same, miner closed, or this erroe
-
Amazing - I've got an i7 3700 that was seeing 4 hpm at 100% with 1GB
Now, it's running with 6 cores - 75% with 6GB and it's nearly 9HPM.
I imagine that if switch off hyperthreading and run it with 4cores at 4GB I'll get the best results and upto 12HPM?
I'm baffled, amazed, grateful and awed. What did you do? How is this possible? Can the same optimization be made for GPUs or have you put CPUs back on an equal footing long term?
how to write the .bat? can you set an example for me, cuz english is not my first language :'(
-
how to write the .bat? can you set an example for me, cuz english is not my first language :'(
its easy
just edit yam-mmc.cfg or yam-pts.cfg depends on your mining coin, then just run miner with 1 of these commands:
yam --config yam-mmc.cfg
yam --config yam-pts.cfg
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
To mine MemoryCoin with yam M7j use provided miner config template named yam-mmc.cfg as a base, check readme.txt for more details.
yam M7j optimised for mining MMC on CPUs with AES-NI support and has 5 different algo variations for HT, non-HT and GPU friendly setups.
yam M7j miner now supports PTS mining at beeeeer and includes fix for Win2003 and other older 64bit systems. Check readme.txt for details.
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
yvg1900
New miner is great! 320% performance boost. My i7 3770k is outpacing my 7950 GPU now, using only 30% of the power!
-
sorry, was still testing.
there 8 threads using
all 12gb ram were free
hugpages enabled/disabled - no difference
and now, sth new :D miner doesnt start anymore with aesni on anymore
and with off shows the same msg X_X
i tested on all my win2008/2012 servers
all have the same, miner closed, or this erroe
EXACT CPU model? K10 is a family, and did you try generic and barcelona builds?
-
EXACT CPU model? K10 is a family, and did you try generic and barcelona builds?
they are
AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4171 HE / win2012 / 14gb ram
and intel i7 950 / win2008 / 8gb ram
i did tried those 2 versions too :-?
-
Azure VPS is known to have problems with AES-NI and AVX virtualization support.
You may try running barcelona or generic build, or try these builds in PTS mining mode.
-
Azure VPS is known to have problems with AES-NI and AVX virtualization support.
You may try running barcelona or generic build, or try these builds in PTS mining mode.
thnx for ur help
want to try aws with 42bit now :D
-
yvg1900 - great job with the miner!
i5-3337U Ivy - 2.1 --> now 3.1 HPM
i5-3340M Ivy - 2.4 --> now 4.0 HPM
i5-2450M Sandy 0.9 --> now 1.9 HPM
Taking into account power consumption, I would have to get 28HPM on the single 280x to get same performance/watt.
MMC rocks...
I think we should (grant) support the dev, so the version with no mine for dev can be release and market it for wider adoption... big selling point for MMC
-
......
I think we should (grant) support the dev, so the version with no mine for dev can be release and market it for wider adoption... big selling point for MMC
when u get more than 3x mmc now, y not mining few minutes for dev :D
i myself prefer this instead of mining sloooooooow but all for me x_X
-
yvg1900 amazing job
i7-3770k ivy before 3.991 hpm with mc2miner and now 10.175 hpm
xeon e5-2620 @2ghz with 4 thread 1.012 hpm and now 2.681hpm with 3 threads (with 4 threads I have problem with memory, only 4GB available and then no solutions/no submits)
xeon e5-2670 @2.6ghz with 32 thread 10.011 hpm and now 29.299 hpm
-
when u get more than 3x mmc now, y not mining few minutes for dev :D
Don't get me wrong - I will mine for dev even when there's version without it, however I realise some people will not like it, so this could reach wider audience...
-
Yvg1900, is there anyway to dedicate 4 threads per 1Gb of data instead of 1 th x Gb?
-
anyone can test miner on Xeon Quad Core E3-1270v2 ???
-
how to write the .bat? can you set an example for me, cuz english is not my first language :'(
its easy
just edit yam-mmc.cfg or yam-pts.cfg depends on your mining coin, then just run miner with 1 of these commands:
yam --config yam-mmc.cfg
yam --config yam-pts.cfg
How do you run this in OS X?
I built a shell script with the following (and chmod to 777):
#!/bin/bash
yam --config yam-mmc.cfg
I have yam-mmc.cfg, the yam application and this shell script all in the same folder. When I run this shell script from the terminal it tells me
yam: command not found.
(and yes, I changed directory to where the yam app and .sh file are stored. I even tried by just dragging the .sh file into terminal. Same response.)
Thanks.
-
How do you run this in OS X?
I built a shell script with the following (and chmod to 777):
#!/bin/bash
yam --config yam-mmc.cfg
I have yam-mmc.cfg, the yam application and this shell script all in the same folder. When I run this shell script from the terminal it tells me
yam: command not found.
(and yes, I changed directory to where the yam app and .sh file are stored. I even tried by just dragging the .sh file into terminal. Same response.)
Thanks.
Nevermind. Forgot to add ./ to the yam command. Should be ./yam in the .sh file.
-
If you want to setup a daemon under ubuntu you can do it in this way (for example if you connect via putty to a server and it should run always; automatically after a server reboot, you loose the putty session, etc..):
First:
sudo -s
cd /root
wget https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/a3uOQMzebM/yam-yvg1900-M7j-linux64-generic.tgz
gzip -d yam-yvg1900-M7j-linux64-generic.tgz
tar -xvf yam-yvg1900-M7j-linux64-generic.tar
cd yam-yvg1900-M7j-linux64-generic
cp linux64-generic/yam .
vi yam-mmc.cfg
content of yam-mmc.cfg
threads = 32
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=on
mine = getwork://MDp6AbARFnh68S8jURM4T8WBWudY5caMPq@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
mine = getwork://MDp6AbARFnh68S8jURM4T8WBWudY5caMPq@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
mine = getwork://TiGei99.worker5:x@extasie.net:8337/mmc
mine = getwork://yvg1900.mmc_1:x@mmc.gpools.com:8080/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 1
Second:
vi /etc/init/yam
content of /etc/init/yam
#!/bin/sh
logfile=/root/yam.log
exec /root/yam-yvg1900-M7j-linux64-generic/yam -c /root/yam-yvg1900-M7j-linux64-generic/yam-mmc.cfg > $logfile 2>&1
Third:
chmod u+x /etc/init/yam
vi /etc/init/yam.conf
content of /etc/init/yam.conf
description "yam"
#this is the code for config file /etc/init/yam.conf
start on filesystem
stop on runlevel [!2345]
oom never
expect daemon
respawn
respawn limit 10 60 # 10 times in 60 seconds
script
user=root
home=/root
cmd=/etc/init/yam
pidfile=$home/yam-yvg1900-M7j-linux64-generic/yam.pid
# Don't change anything below here unless you know what you're doing
[[ -e $pidfile && ! -d "/proc/$(cat $pidfile)" ]] && rm $pidfile
[[ -e $pidfile && "$(cat /proc/$(cat $pidfile)/cmdline)" != $cmd* ]] && rm $pidfile
exec start-stop-daemon --start -c $user --chdir $home --pidfile $pidfile --startas $cmd -b -m
end script
Fourth:
sudo initctl reload-configuration
sudo start yam
tail -f /root/yam.log
The screen refresh is only about every 20 seconds
-
Two questions: What happens if there is not enough RAM per thread? (For instance, I have 4 threads but only 2GB RAM.)
Can you explain why I am not getting a hashrate?
2014-01-14 00:10:54.439614] work.mmcpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 00:10:59.918044] MMC Agg. SPM: 0.000, HPM: ?; Rnds C/I: 0/0, Don. C/I: 0/0; Cfg/Thr SPM: 0.000/?, Cfg/Thr HPM: ?/? 0 rnds AV=1, ART=?
My config looks like:
threads = 0
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=off
mine = getwork://MLzSj31GVDqYLstZjFFqoGjafhiGz5FkRo@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
mine = getwork://MLzSj31GVDqYLstZjFFqoGjafhiGz5FkRo@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
aesni is off because this server I am using does not support AES.
Thanks!
-
At the moment I believe that there is no point running yam M7j on non-AES-NI configs - I expect it may be slower even than original miner, because of non-AES-NI codepath did not get enough attention from me. Probably for next versions.
As of less memory usage, I am working on that. Major part of the optimization was to reduce data exchange and contention between cores, that's why separate buffer per thread used. Reverting back to old schema is possible in theory, but it is complete rethink of the optimizations made and needs time. You can imagne even this set of optimizations took long time to get implemented.
As of miner behavior under low RAM situations, there is absolutely no special handling for that except for some null pointer checks. At first, applcation performance will degrade due to swapping (if you have one configured - I don't) and if there is not enough RAM even in case of swapping, it will (may) just crash, but will do so at very early stage.
If you are not getting hashrate, then system runs extremely slow due to swapping (=> more RAM or less threads), inter-socket data exchange over QPI (=> numactl or proper affinity setup) or no AES-NI. There is an ART parameter (Average Round Time in milliseconds) that shall be less than 60000 in regular cases. 45000 is typical, less than 30000 is fast.
If you reduced number of threads due to RAM constrains, consider using av=2 or av=3 to gain from non-HT algo variations.
yvg1900
P.S. At the end, it is MemoryCoin :) It is supposed to consume A LOT of memory for PoW :)
-
If you reduced number of threads due to RAM constrains, consider using av=2 or av=3 to gain from non-HT algo variations.
yvg1900
P.S. At the end, it is MemoryCoin :) It is supposed to consume A LOT of memory for PoW :)
In my configuration 2 x 6 core xeon with 12gb and 24 threads if I setup more than 6 threads it allocate those threads in not huge page... Also if I run two instances of the miner, it can't allocate more than 6gb... is it because it is 6gb for Cpu?
-
One of advantages of HugePages is that they bypass OS memory swapping mechanism, so if you are unable to get them allocated, there is a high chance that you will get some of memory swapped out to disk, and this will lead to extreme underperformance.
Possibilities in your case are to add more RAM, further reduce number of threads or wait until I come up with alternate version of miner with lower RAM requirements. But expect that version to be slower. How much - it is matter of tests and efforts put into optimizing.
yvg1900
-
At the moment I believe that there is no point running yam M7j on non-AES-NI configs - I expect it may be slower even than original miner, because of non-AES-NI codepath did not get enough attention from me. Probably for next versions.
As of less memory usage, I am working on that. Major part of the optimization was to reduce data exchange and contention between cores, that's why separate buffer per thread used. Reverting back to old schema is possible in theory, but it is complete rethink of the optimizations made and needs time. You can imagne even this set of optimizations took long time to get implemented.
As of miner behavior under low RAM situations, there is absolutely no special handling for that except for some null pointer checks. At first, applcation performance will degrade due to swapping (if you have one configured - I don't) and if there is not enough RAM even in case of swapping, it will (may) just crash, but will do so at very early stage.
If you are not getting hashrate, then system runs extremely slow due to swapping (=> more RAM or less threads), inter-socket data exchange over QPI (=> numactl or proper affinity setup) or no AES-NI. There is an ART parameter (Average Round Time in milliseconds) that shall be less than 60000 in regular cases. 45000 is typical, less than 30000 is fast.
If you reduced number of threads due to RAM constrains, consider using av=2 or av=3 to gain from non-HT algo variations.
yvg1900
P.S. At the end, it is MemoryCoin :) It is supposed to consume A LOT of memory for PoW :)
Thank you for your reply. Here's a more specific situation:
I have a cloud server with 24 threads and 24 GB Ram which DOES support AES-NI. My config looks like this:
threads = 0
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=on
mine = getwork://MLzSj31GVDqYLstZjFFqoGjafhiGz5FkRo@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
mine = getwork://MLzSj31GVDqYLstZjFFqoGjafhiGz5FkRoGe@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 1
When I run yam ("./yam -c yam-mmc.cfg") I get about 20 - 30 second of output like this:
[2014-01-13 19:22:48.367916] work.mmcpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-13 19:22:48.367963] mmcpool.1gh.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-13 19:22:48.367981] mmc.gpools.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-13 19:22:58.367844] MMC Agg. SPM: 0.000, HPM: ?; Rnds C/I: 0/0, Don. C/I: 0/0; Cfg/Thr SPM: 0.000/?, Cfg/Thr HPM: ?/? 0 rnds AV=1, ART=?
And then it crashes.
I can see that it has contacted the server, "work.mmcpool.com: On-line" but no hashing, I am using the Generic x64 Linux miner on Unbutu 13.04 (x64).
Any ideas? Thanks.
PS: When I look at hugepages (cat /proc/meminfo | grep AnonHugePages)
I get:
AnonHugePages: 0 kB
Not good?
-
Unfortunately, here we have nearly the same situation as we had with cloud servers running first versions of PTS mining (before yam, it was jhProtominer M7c-M7h, probably you followed a bit).
I recommend you the following:
1. Post here output of the miner that comes right after banner message - there is info on algo in use, number of threads selected and optimization compatibility checks - there we will see if AES-NI is really working
2. Try running it with ONE thread. You shall get ART value within reasonable time and factor out many potential issues.
3. Post here output of numactl --hardware (this is TYPICAL that cloud services DO NOT properly support NUMA, to be honest I am NOT aware of any that does that right, as well as memory management is completely unacceptable for high performance computing).
From what I see, you have multi-socket system (some Dual Xeon E5-26XX), so proper NUMA support is critical. Default memory allocation policy for such systems is typical to be Interleaved, causing huge underperformance under heavy memory load due to QPI bandwidth limitation, which is exactly our case.
Note that miner updates statistics in between rounds, so not showing statistics means that round takes way too long - compare this with physical machine - some SB, IB or Haswell i7.
As of crash, which EXACTLY CPU is there and which build do you use?
yvg1900
P.S. In other case I would not support cloud services and low end configs because of they simply using outdated and improperly configured software. But let us try to figure out what we can do.
-
With the new coin miner fully justifies its name. :)
Yes! Thanks for bringing mining home to CPUs and Memory. 5000 MMC tip on its way to yvg1900 from MCF.
-
With the new coin miner fully justifies its name. :)
Yes! Thanks for bringing mining home to CPUs and Memory. 5000 MMC tip on its way to yvg1900 from MCF.
Got it. I appreciate.
As a response to the tip, I announce that I will change my priorities towards to MMC CPU mining and will put more efforts into additional optimizations of MMC CPU mining:
- Better support for non-AES-NI CPUS to bring small miners closer to profitable mining;
- Variation of a mining setup with shared 1Gb memory for all threads (expect lower performance fur such setups due to inter-core contention);
- More optimizations to AES-NI algos to come even closer to GPU;
- More pool and protocol support (I encourage pool maintainers to contact me in order to provide better integration and improve general mining experience);
- Built-in NUMA support for better CPU utilization and proper data flow routing.
I will keep concentrating on optimizing miners for physical CPUs, because of cloud servers have numerous issues with memory management, NUMA compatibility, advanced instruction set exposure, etc.
I will not give any ETA, you all can imagine there is a lot of research work going on, and tens of different algo implementations are being tested.
yvg1900
-
Yes! Thanks for bringing mining home to CPUs and Memory. 5000 MMC tip on its way to yvg1900 from MCF.
Got it. I appreciate.
As a response to the tip, I announce that I will change my priorities towards to MMC CPU mining and will put more efforts into additional optimizations of MMC CPU mining:
Wow! Thanks!
Any suggestions for the best linux distribution to base our LiveCD on?
-
badbonez - I had that issue when using machine with 8GB of ram but 24 cores.
Currently, this miner requires 1GB of RAM per thread. So what I ended up doing was using
6 threads - which uses 6GB, and then use another miner that only uses 1GB for the other 18 threads.
I see now I have a similar situation. How do you tell the miner to use 1GB for the other 18 threads?
-
Got it. I appreciate.
As a response to the tip, I announce that I will change my priorities towards to MMC CPU mining and will put more efforts into additional optimizations of MMC CPU mining:
- Better support for non-AES-NI CPUS to bring small miners closer to profitable mining;
- Variation of a mining setup with shared 1Gb memory for all threads (expect lower performance fur such setups due to inter-core contention);
- More optimizations to AES-NI algos to come even closer to GPU;
- More pool and protocol support (I encourage pool maintainers to contact me in order to provide better integration and improve general mining experience);
- Built-in NUMA support for better CPU utilization and proper data flow routing.
I will keep concentrating on optimizing miners for physical CPUs, because of cloud servers have numerous issues with memory management, NUMA compatibility, advanced instruction set exposure, etc.
I will not give any ETA, you all can imagine there is a lot of research work going on, and tens of different algo implementations are being tested.
yvg1900
yvg1900 you are my hero ;D
Pool support is already really good. Also http://extasie.net/ works perfect but this pool is at the moment dead. Don't know why. Currently 0% fee there. Maybe it is because you have to register and with the other pools it is easier because you only need a payout address.
mine = getwork://TiGei99.worker5:x@extasie.net:8337/mmc
-
Hello, on my computer monitor is connected to graphic card.
When your gpu miner is working I can't see picture on my monitor. Picture doesn't refresh. I can't even close gpu miner when it need.
GPU miner from 1gh pool doesn't have this problem.
I think this may be the reason that main gpu miner is on 1gh pool.
-
xeon e5-2670 @2.6ghz with 32 thread 10.011 hpm and now 29.299 hpm
How much memory does it consume?
P.S. At the end, it is MemoryCoin :) It is supposed to consume A LOT of memory for PoW :)
It's a FEATURE!!!
yvg1900, marvelous, it's exactly that I've been requesting about a month ago.
Also, one question. From readme-file:
"For MemoryCoin, allowed parameters are: "av" (algorithm variation, 1 variations in total"
so, we have no fine-tuning at all for MMC, only for PTS, am I right?
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
To mine MemoryCoin with yam M7j use provided miner config template named yam-mmc.cfg as a base, check readme.txt for more details.
yam M7j optimised for mining MMC on CPUs with AES-NI support and has 5 different algo variations for HT, non-HT and GPU friendly setups.
yam M7j miner now supports PTS mining at beeeeer and includes fix for Win2003 and other older 64bit systems. Check readme.txt for details.
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
yvg1900
I've got 2 computers running windows 7. One is an 8 core AMD FX cpu and the other is a 4 core AMD FX cpu. Which version of the miner am I supposed to used? Also, is it possible to solo mine protoshares or memorycoin using this miner, or is it only possible to use a pool?
-
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Platform: Intel(R) OpenCL
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Device: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Total device memory: 1624 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Maximum buffer size: 406 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Cannot use the device! Maximum buffer size is less than 1024
MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Platform: NVIDIA CUDA
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Device: GeForce 610M
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Total device memory: 2048 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Maximum buffer size: 512 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Cannot use the device! Maximum buffer size is less than 1024
MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU2] Device not found
13:51:31.013 Started 0 miner threads
nooo :'(
is possible set the program for use in Maximum buffer size 512?
-
Hello, on my computer monitor is connected to graphic card.
When your gpu miner is working I can't see picture on my monitor. Picture doesn't refresh. I can't even close gpu miner when it need.
GPU miner from 1gh pool doesn't have this problem.
I think this may be the reason that main gpu miner is on 1gh pool.
Please, reboot and run the miner from the start. Tell me your GPU/OS and copy miner's start log if the problem persists.
-
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Platform: Intel(R) OpenCL
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Device: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Total device memory: 1624 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Maximum buffer size: 406 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU0] Cannot use the device! Maximum buffer size is less than 1024
MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Platform: NVIDIA CUDA
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Device: GeForce 610M
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Total device memory: 2048 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Maximum buffer size: 512 MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU1] Cannot use the device! Maximum buffer size is less than 1024
MB
13:51:31.013 [GPU2] Device not found
13:51:31.013 Started 0 miner threads
nooo :'(
is possible set the program for use in Maximum buffer size 512?
I've just updated the miner. It now tries to allocate 1GB buffer regardless of what the driver reports. You could try if it works on your card. Anyway the 610's performance will be disappointing. You'll get much more with any modern CPU and yam miner.
-
Great job yvg1900!! Trippling the performance both on i7 3770k with the ivy bridge build and on AMD FX 8350 with the generic build.
Being that the CPUs are about $200 and GPUs about $400, CPU's are now operating at parity with the GPUs in $/Hash !
Frostybutdelicious, the "generic" build works well for the AMD FX. Using 6 threads the performance is almost at parity with the i7 3770k.
Wearing some bling \ / and -($)-($)- today.
$
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
To mine MemoryCoin with yam M7j use provided miner config template named yam-mmc.cfg as a base, check readme.txt for more details.
yam M7j optimised for mining MMC on CPUs with AES-NI support and has 5 different algo variations for HT, non-HT and GPU friendly setups.
yam M7j miner now supports PTS mining at beeeeer and includes fix for Win2003 and other older 64bit systems. Check readme.txt for details.
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
yvg1900
I've got 2 computers running windows 7. One is an 8 core AMD FX cpu and the other is a 4 core AMD FX cpu. Which version of the miner am I supposed to used? Also, is it possible to solo mine protoshares or memorycoin using this miner, or is it only possible to use a pool?
EDIT: my i7 3770k works with ivy bridge not sandy bridge.
-
I appreciate the help! I am using a 6-core (L5639), 24 thread Unbutu 13.04 server. When I run ./yam -c yam-mmc.cfg it runs for about 20-30 seconds and then dies. If I run yam with say 12 threads, it works fine. But I'd rather not run multiple instances. (NOTE: It will not work if I run 2x 12 thread instances. If I run a 12 th and a 8 th instance I get a combined HPM of ~12. About the same if I just ran a single 12 thread instance.)
I have added my configuration file, cpuinfo, meminfo and output of the miner below.
Here is my config file:
threads = 0
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=on
mine = getwork://MLzSj31GVDqYLstZjFFqoGjafhiGz5FkRo@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
mine = getwork://MLzSj31GVDqYLstZjFFqoGjafhiGz5FkRoGe@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 1
CPUINFO:
processor : 23
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 2
microcode : 0x15
cpu MHz : 1600.000
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 12
core id : 10
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 53
initial apicid : 53
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat epb dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4266.84
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
MEMINFO:
MemTotal: 24682120 kB
MemFree: 24314448 kB
Buffers: 812 kB
Cached: 5656 kB
SwapCached: 3136 kB
Active: 3996 kB
Inactive: 11040 kB
Active(anon): 3344 kB
Inactive(anon): 5288 kB
Active(file): 652 kB
Inactive(file): 5752 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
SwapTotal: 93180 kB
SwapFree: 75052 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 5644 kB
Mapped: 1236 kB
Shmem: 12 kB
Slab: 69792 kB
SReclaimable: 27676 kB
SUnreclaim: 42116 kB
KernelStack: 1680 kB
PageTables: 1860 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 12434240 kB
Committed_AS: 63616 kB
VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed: 332044 kB
VmallocChunk: 34346626364 kB
HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
AnonHugePages: 0 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
DirectMap4k: 48320 kB
DirectMap2M: 4136960 kB
DirectMap1G: 20971520 kB
Here's the output of the miner:
Loading config file [yam-mmc.cfg]
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.838847] Miner version: yam M7j-linux64-generic/yvg1900
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.839029] Checking target [getwork://MLzSj31GVDqYLstZjFFqoGjafhiGz5FkRo@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc]...
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.840281] Target OK
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.840359] Checking target [getwork://MLzSj31GVDqYLstZjFFqoGjafhiGz5FkRoGe@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc]...
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.840425] Target OK
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.840490] Checking target [getwork://badbonez.mac:xxxx@mmc.gpools.com:8080/mmc]...
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.840551] Target OK
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.840578] Checking params [mmc:av=1&aesni=on]...
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.840620] Params OK
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.841237] Checking MMC Stage 1 optimizations compatibility...
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.841342] Checking MMC Stage 2 optimizations compatibility...
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.842703] OK: MMC optimizations are compatible
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.842931] MemoryCoin: Memory usage 1024M per thread, Algorithm Variation 1
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.843012] Using 24 mining threads
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.845115] Will mine 24 rounds for miner developers to support development of the next version
[2014-01-14 09:41:56.845344] Follow @yvg1900 on Twitter to get information on new version availability on time
[2014-01-14 09:41:57.362127] New MemoryCoin Block nTime 1389721330
[2014-01-14 09:41:57.860896] MMC Agg. SPM: ?, HPM: ?; Rnds C/I: 0/0, Don. C/I: 0/0; Cfg/Thr SPM: ?/?, Cfg/Thr HPM: ?/? 0 rnds AV=1, ART=?
[2014-01-14 09:41:57.860948] work.mmcpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 09:41:57.860977] mmcpool.1gh.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 09:41:57.860997] mmc.gpools.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 09:42:02.139607] New MemoryCoin Block nTime 1389721335
[2014-01-14 09:42:07.860886] MMC Agg. SPM: ?, HPM: ?; Rnds C/I: 0/0, Don. C/I: 0/0; Cfg/Thr SPM: ?/?, Cfg/Thr HPM: ?/? 0 rnds AV=1, ART=?
[2014-01-14 09:42:07.860940] work.mmcpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 09:42:07.860966] mmcpool.1gh.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 09:42:07.860985] mmc.gpools.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 09:42:08.504830] New MemoryCoin Block nTime 1389721340
[2014-01-14 09:42:12.270875] New MemoryCoin Block nTime 1389721344
[2014-01-14 09:42:17.860886] MMC Agg. SPM: ?, HPM: ?; Rnds C/I: 0/0, Don. C/I: 0/0; Cfg/Thr SPM: ?/?, Cfg/Thr HPM: ?/? 0 rnds AV=1, ART=?
[2014-01-14 09:42:17.860940] work.mmcpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 09:42:17.860964] mmcpool.1gh.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-01-14 09:42:17.860982] mmc.gpools.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
Killed
Thank you!
Unfortunately, here we have nearly the same situation as we had with cloud servers running first versions of PTS mining (before yam, it was jhProtominer M7c-M7h, probably you followed a bit).
I recommend you the following:
1. Post here output of the miner that comes right after banner message - there is info on algo in use, number of threads selected and optimization compatibility checks - there we will see if AES-NI is really working
2. Try running it with ONE thread. You shall get ART value within reasonable time and factor out many potential issues.
3. Post here output of numactl --hardware (this is TYPICAL that cloud services DO NOT properly support NUMA, to be honest I am NOT aware of any that does that right, as well as memory management is completely unacceptable for high performance computing).
From what I see, you have multi-socket system (some Dual Xeon E5-26XX), so proper NUMA support is critical. Default memory allocation policy for such systems is typical to be Interleaved, causing huge underperformance under heavy memory load due to QPI bandwidth limitation, which is exactly our case.
Note that miner updates statistics in between rounds, so not showing statistics means that round takes way too long - compare this with physical machine - some SB, IB or Haswell i7.
As of crash, which EXACTLY CPU is there and which build do you use?
yvg1900
P.S. In other case I would not support cloud services and low end configs because of they simply using outdated and improperly configured software. But let us try to figure out what we can do.
-
With a dual L5639 I get 13 hpm on 24 threads, not a huge improvement over the previous miners, definitely not 300% (btw I'm using Nehalem binary)
-
With a dual L5639 I get 13 hpm on 24 threads, not a huge improvement over the previous miners, definitely not 300% (btw I'm using Nehalem binary)
I'm just trying to get the miner to run on all 24 threads. When I try just 12 threads, I get about 11HPM, I was hoping (maybe too optimistic) that 24 threads = ~22HPM. But I'm paying for the 24 threads on the cloud server, I want to use them all.
-
Yeah I'm pretty bummed out, but 3 extra hpm is compared to previous miners is cool.
-
Target OK
Error: boost::bad_any_cast: failed conversion using boost::any_cast
Any idea what can be wrong?
-
New version of GPU miner released!
- Windows x64: http://dl.mmcpool.com/gpu/mmcpool-gpu-miner-windows-x64.zip
- Ubuntu x64: http://dl.mmcpool.com/gpu/mmcpool-gpu-miner-ubuntu-x64.tgz
Please, post your feedback. NVIDIA GPUs are supported!
-
With the new coin miner fully justifies its name. :)
Yes! Thanks for bringing mining home to CPUs and Memory. 5000 MMC tip on its way to yvg1900 from MCF.
yvg1900 should be the CTO i think
-
With the new coin miner fully justifies its name. :)
Yes! Thanks for bringing mining home to CPUs and Memory. 5000 MMC tip on its way to yvg1900 from MCF.
yvg1900 should be the CTO i think
Only if he open-sources his code! As CTO he would be getting paid anyway.
-
I'm on windows, and when I enter this command downloads\yam....\yam....\yam.exe --config yam-mmc.cfg it tells me I need to specify at least one --mine parameter. But those are specified in the config file, so I'm not sure how to proceed. Any ideas?
-
I'm mining with a couple of CPU's and I've gone from about 30 coins/day to 4 coins/day in a few days. A big rise in difficulty or is it the new GPU miners that's taking over?
-
With the new coin miner fully justifies its name. :)
Yes! Thanks for bringing mining home to CPUs and Memory. 5000 MMC tip on its way to yvg1900 from MCF.
yvg1900 should be the CTO i think
Only if he open-sources his code! As CTO he would be getting paid anyway.
agreed, he needs to open it if wanna get the position.
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
To mine MemoryCoin with yam M7j use provided miner config template named yam-mmc.cfg as a base, check readme.txt for more details.
yam M7j optimised for mining MMC on CPUs with AES-NI support and has 5 different algo variations for HT, non-HT and GPU friendly setups.
yam M7j miner now supports PTS mining at beeeeer and includes fix for Win2003 and other older 64bit systems. Check readme.txt for details.
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
yvg1900
It seems that they are compile at linux-core 2.6.24. But almost all my servers are runing at lower kernel such as 2.6.18. Could you please just recompile with older kernel or can you share source code to me? I can compile in my environment. Thank you so much...
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
To mine MemoryCoin with yam M7j use provided miner config template named yam-mmc.cfg as a base, check readme.txt for more details.
yam M7j optimised for mining MMC on CPUs with AES-NI support and has 5 different algo variations for HT, non-HT and GPU friendly setups.
yam M7j miner now supports PTS mining at beeeeer and includes fix for Win2003 and other older 64bit systems. Check readme.txt for details.
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
yvg1900
It seems that they are compile at linux-core 2.6.24. But almost all my servers are runing at lower kernel such as 2.6.18. Could you please just recompile with older kernel or can you share source code to me? I can compile in my environment. Thank you so much...
If 2.6.18 means CenOS 5, then AES-NI is not available there. You have to write (or find) a driver that would enable it.
-
badbonez - I had that issue when using machine with 8GB of ram but 24 cores.
Currently, this miner requires 1GB of RAM per thread. So what I ended up doing was using
6 threads - which uses 6GB, and then use another miner that only uses 1GB for the other 18 threads.
I see now I have a similar situation. How do you tell the miner to use 1GB for the other 18 threads?
I used a different optimized miner in the other thread. Alternatively I would suggest if you can get more RAM - try on one machine and see how much it improves.
After all it's MEMORY coin :) It should benefit it! :)
According to my cloud server specs (cat /proc/meminfo and cat/proc/cpuinfo) I have 24 threads and 24GB RAM. But it does not work if I specify 24 threads, I can only get 12 threads to work. If I try to run another instance with 12 or fewer threads, it just slows down the entire process, so that I still only get about 11hpm.
I have posted detailed specs here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1630.msg28357#msg28357 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1630.msg28357#msg28357)
Any ideas?
-
badbonez - I had that issue when using machine with 8GB of ram but 24 cores.
Currently, this miner requires 1GB of RAM per thread. So what I ended up doing was using
6 threads - which uses 6GB, and then use another miner that only uses 1GB for the other 18 threads.
I see now I have a similar situation. How do you tell the miner to use 1GB for the other 18 threads?
I used a different optimized miner in the other thread. Alternatively I would suggest if you can get more RAM - try on one machine and see how much it improves.
After all it's MEMORY coin :) It should benefit it! :)
According to my cloud server specs (cat /proc/meminfo and cat/proc/cpuinfo) I have 24 threads and 24GB RAM. But it does not work if I specify 24 threads, I can only get 12 threads to work. If I try to run another instance with 12 or fewer threads, it just slows down the entire process, so that I still only get about 11hpm.
I have posted detailed specs here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1630.msg28357#msg28357 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1630.msg28357#msg28357)
Any ideas?
Hyperthreading does not play well with AES-NI.
-
yvg1900, please optimize the miner for L5639 xeon CPU, currently it's mining performance seems to be maxed out at 12 threads.
-
e3 1230V3 always crashes with 7 threads 8GB ram
anyone knows why
-
For me is necessary port parameter for gpu miner because cpu works only on 80 port and not on 8880
-
I could use some help.
I am following the alt mining coin business for a few weeks now and mined quarks and Yacoin. But for the long run i want to start with memorycoin now the new CPU miner is more powerfull. Thank you for that yvg1900!!
But i doesnt get the miner to start. Maybe iam doing something wrong on the command line. I keep getting the messages that I need to specify at least one --mine parameter.[
After is specify the folder in the commandline i type this: yam --config yam.cfg
C:\Users\Wilbertk\Downloads\yam-yvg1900-M7j-win64-haswell\yam-yvg1900-M7j-win64-
haswell\win64-haswell>yam --config yam.cfg
YAM - Yet Another Miner by yvg1900
yam M7j-win64-haswell/yvg1900
***************************************************
* Supported coins: PTS *
* Author: yvg1900 (Twitter @yvg1900) *
* XPT protocol: jh (http://ypool.net) *
* *
* Addresses for Thanks and Donations: *
* PTS: PZxsEQoiMeB6tHcW2ZySBEiCPio1WkxbEL *
* XPM: AW2388DEWNEfMH4rP9kcj9yKcMq1QywYT4 *
* DTC: D6PmUogMigWvXurgFTqm5VLxQeVpXdYQj3 *
* MMC: MVk7PuJCa9o6qTYeiQRJDd3uHxKXMrQuU6 *
* LTC: Lby4YjhcAxhmbsdHFb4nYydrwGoiJezZt1 *
* BTC: 1FxekeK5La7AuF3oxiLzPKnjXyLMrux6VT *
* NMC: N9KXqmzEqP7gB2dGHpEZiRMgFjUHNM38FR *
***************************************************
Miner version: yam M7j-win64-haswell/yvg1900
Error: At least one mining target shall be defined with --mine parameter
Which mistake does i make?
-
Also ensure that either yam-mmc.cfg located in the same directory as yam executable, or you specified reachable path to it in --config parameter.
Follow @yvg1900 on Twitter to get updates on performance mining software
-
Thank you asenki it worked :D
-
Hello,
I am new at this and trying to run yvg1900's miner on a Mac Book Pro
yam.cfg:
threads = 0
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=on
mine = getwork://MFfu4Hkknrxfcf2CvhknVsE12WX7AhgBt5@work.mmcpool.com:8883/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 1
Command being run:
./yam --config yam.mmc.cfg
Output:
Miner version: yam M7j-macos64-ivy-bridge/yvg1900
Warning: Huge Pages not available in MacOS X version, performance may be lower than on Linux and Windows versions
Abort trap: 6
Any ideas?
-
I've been doing some analysis and tweaking this morning.
Test machine and i7 3770 with 8GB
This has 4 real cores and uses hyperthreading for 8 virtual cores.
I'm finding that most of the performance (~85%) is achievable with only 4 threads - assuming those threads are maxing out the AES-NI instructions.
Mining with the other 4 threads is not efficient - it's better to use those to mine another CPU coin that doesn't require AES-NI - ProtoShares or Primecoin are good candidates.
I've just tested ProtoShares, it does impact the MemoryCoin HPM, probably because of contention for memory.
Total figures I'm seeing on the i7 3770 - 8GB
MMC - 5.2HPM
plus
PTS - 115CPM
This is in contrast to just running MMC exclusively - which gives about 9HPM
Might see less impact on MMC mining if using the remaining cores to mine a non-memory intensive CPU coin like Prime.
Okay - tested a Prime miner - using the non AVX version gives better results, so I'm thinking the contention is not for memory, but instruction set - Here's the figures
MMC - 6.2 HPM
plus
XPM - 14,000 PPS
- This might be a good combination of coins to mine on the same machine
-
I've been doing some analysis and tweaking this morning.
Test machine and i7 3770 with 8GB
This has 4 real cores and uses hyperthreading for 8 virtual cores.
I'm finding that most of the performance (~85%) is achievable with only 4 threads - assuming those threads are maxing out the AES-NI instructions.
Mining with the other 4 threads is not efficient - it's better to use those to mine another CPU coin that doesn't require AES-NI - ProtoShares or Primecoin are good candidates.
I've just tested ProtoShares, it does impact the MemoryCoin HPM, probably because of contention for memory.
Total figures I'm seeing on the i7 3770 - 8GB
MMC - 5.2HPM
plus
PTS - 115CPM
This is in contrast to just running MMC exclusively - which gives about 9HPM
Might see less impact on MMC mining if using the remaining cores to mine a non-memory intensive CPU coin like Prime.
Okay - tested a Prime miner - using the non AVX version gives better results, so I'm thinking the contention is not for memory, but instruction set - Here's the figures
MMC - 6.2 HPM
plus
XPM - 14,000 PPS
- This might be a good combination of coins to mine on the same machine
The major point in such setups is algo variation used (configured via AV parameter).
av=1 maximizes TOTAL hpm for HyperThreading-enabled machines, so using av=1 setups is not efficient if you run 4 threads on 4-core mach with HT. For that setup there is av=3, which really maxes out AES-NI capabilities of the non-HT core.
Another issue is that you have to properly pin your process to logical CPUs, having in mind avoiding core sharing. This is non-trivial task, but can be accomplished with stock OS tools, too.
Multicoin CPU mining is actually initial design idea of yam, and this is exactly why I am combining coins in monolythic miner.
I am currently experimenting more algo variations, so probably we will have other possibilities as well.
yvg1900
-
Thank you very much yvg1900 for releasing this publicly. I am getting a 3x increase and that is fantastic. I've got a question though. As I run your miner, my hashes will start at a certain number and then climb continuously until my system becomes unstable and my graphics cards drop out and I need to restart the computer. My CPU temps start out low and climb and climb as well.
My setup is a 4820k, overclocked to 4.5G Ivy Bridge. I'm running 5 threads atm after starting with 7 then crashing, and then 6 followed by eventual crashing. It appears as if 5 threads is going to do this as well as my hashes climb. I started at about 9.6 and now it's well above 9.9. My temps started in the high EDIT:60's (Not 70's) (c) and are now beginning to pass 80c.
Any idea what would cause this?
Sorry if anyone's asked this before, but I didn't see it mentioned anywhere in the thread.
EDIT: I found out that it's just maxing out the cooling capabilities of my heatsink. Looks like I'll have to get rid of the overclock or go to water cooling to feel comfortable running this at more than 4 threads, I've got a fairly capable heatsink on there. 5 threads is right on the limit - my fan is maxed out and the cpu rests at about 82-83c. Anything more than that it just gets too hot and leads to instability. It is interesting to see that I gain ~10% more hashes by pushing the cpu into higher temperatures.
-
yam miner is really stressing CPU and memory when maxed out. It is causing many OCed systems to overheat more than while running IntelButrTest in top aggressive mode.
If you are running Linux or Windows with HugePages, it is adjusting memory (DTLB) layout to better fit mem access patterns of MMC, so HPM will climb, but temperatures will climb as well.
Can you check the memory usage of the miner? It shall be mem leak-free, but who knows - maybe I overlooked something.
yvg1900
-
My CPU cooler isn't that great but I underclocked my I2500K to 75% and disabled turbo. The voltage is about 1.1V.
Note: My CPU Sizzles over 75C.
Now I'm grabbing 5.8H/m @ 2.5GHz (x25), av=1. **CORRECTION av=3 (40% more)
(http://4st.me/lkyNH.png)
MMC2miner was running at 1.6H/m @ 3.3GHz.
-
I am working on more different AVs for MMC now, so probably it will be possible to get better balance then...
But as said, CPU really squeezed out by av=1, as well as by av=3.
-
Any specific reason you disabled hyper-threading on that cpu ? You are losing out on some freebee hpm by disabling it.
-
Any specific reason you disabled hyper-threading on that cpu ? You are losing out on some freebee hpm by disabling it.
The i5-2500k doesn't really support HT.
-
Any specific reason you disabled hyper-threading on that cpu ? You are losing out on some freebee hpm by disabling it.
The i5-2500k doesn't really support HT.
Doh, didnt read the I5 part, thats what happens when you speed read important details haha.
-
Block reward: 216.66 MMC :'(
-
Block reward: 216.66 MMC :'(
Maybe it's good effect on the rates.
-
Yvg, good work guy as always!
It works for me but it allocate 1Gb memory per thread so in my scenario (24 thread, 12gb) I can only start 8 thread option and gives me less performace that the 24 threads old miner version.
Is there any chance to set 3 threads work on the same 1gb memory blocks?
I think I can get an huge performance increase if it is possible.
Thanks anyway for awesome work!
I had the same problem...disable Ht, av=2 and 11 threads ;)
-
Yvg, good work guy as always!
It works for me but it allocate 1Gb memory per thread so in my scenario (24 thread, 12gb) I can only start 8 thread option and gives me less performace that the 24 threads old miner version.
Is there any chance to set 3 threads work on the same 1gb memory blocks?
I think I can get an huge performance increase if it is possible.
Thanks anyway for awesome work!
I had the same problem...disable Ht, av=2 and 11 threads ;)
Windows os? How many hpm?
-
Yvg, good work guy as always!
It works for me but it allocate 1Gb memory per thread so in my scenario (24 thread, 12gb) I can only start 8 thread option and gives me less performace that the 24 threads old miner version.
Is there any chance to set 3 threads work on the same 1gb memory blocks?
I think I can get an huge performance increase if it is possible.
Thanks anyway for awesome work!
I had the same problem...disable Ht, av=2 and 11 threads ;)
Windows os? How many hpm?
I'm using win8 pro with a dual xeon 5670 with 12gb of ram, i'm getting 14,6 hpm
-
So there seems to be something really stuffed with share percentages that doesnt add up at all.
I notice the same on 1gh.com
Right now I am at a minimum sending 33% of mmcpool.com submitted shares for each block but each block payout is no more than 12% shares for me.
This is really messed up, I compared the top 50 displayed hashrates. Wether that is correct or incorrect shouldn't matter since I am comparing all the displayed hashrates along with my displayed hashrate on mmcpool.com
I am assuming everyone is showing these same low percentage shares per block which makes me wonder where is the additional percentages ie. For my own stats I am losing out on 20-23% of shares each block.
Something isn't right, there is effectively 20-23% of MMC taken from each block according to these details and the pool fee is suppose to be 3.5%
Please explain this.
-
Right now I am at a minimum sending 33% of mmcpool.com submitted shares for each block but each block payout is no more than 12% shares for me.
What? For 33% your hashrate should be at least 7000-8000.
What is your wallet address?
-
Right now I am at a minimum sending 33% of mmcpool.com submitted shares for each block but each block payout is no more than 12% shares for me.
What? For 33% your hashrate should be at least 7000-8000.
What is your wallet address?
Right now sending much less to mmcpool but here is my wallet address : MN1poSsTRKf4kgJ5UxyJfsYbyBqEg3zdrH
Have a look, something seems terribly wrong with the percentage per block.
-
Have a look, something seems terribly wrong with the percentage per block.
http://mmcpool.com/en/user?wallet=MN1poSsTRKf4kgJ5UxyJfsYbyBqEg3zdrH
(http://i.imgur.com/V9lteZI.png)
-
Have a look, something seems terribly wrong with the percentage per block.
http://mmcpool.com/en/user?wallet=MN1poSsTRKf4kgJ5UxyJfsYbyBqEg3zdrH
(http://i.imgur.com/V9lteZI.png)
Yup the last 2 blocks looked closer to expected per block compared to pool hashrate.
This network hashrate graph is useless though: http://s4l1h.github.io/mmc/
Just looking at my hpm share percentage on mmcpool and my hpm share percentage on mmc.1gh pool the network hashrate is much closer if not above 100 000 hpm right now while that network hashrate graph shows declining hashrate below 50 000 hpm.
Basicly I am trying to make sense of expected returns within a difficulty adjustment range which should be possible to calculate however all available calculations is by far wrong and none of them resemble my personal results thus making MMC mining alot less attractive than the calculators/network hashrate graphs suggest.
-
I updated the SPM -> HPM formula. The pool shows real HPM from now on.
I'll ask 1GH to update their formula.
-
I updated the SPM -> HPM formula. The pool shows real HPM from now on.
I'll ask 1GH to update their formula.
Nice but this brings me to the original point.
Over the last 24hrs I have stayed between 4000-6000 hpm continously however the 24hr earnings is beyond possibility I would say.
I dont see how the pool could have averaged at 33% expected rate.
HPM (estimated) 4623.20
1640.0249 MMC Mined (last 24 hours)
Even using 0.00006961 DIFF daily expected rate should be 3600 MMC and over last 24hrs we have average roughly around 0.00007500 DIFF which at expected daily rate would return 4358 MMC.
These earnings are 50-66% less than expected, is the pool really running this bad ? Seems unreal as if there is seriously issues with the pool even though Ive had <1% rejects consistently and a consistent stable spm to the pool.
-
HPM (estimated) 4623.20
1640.0249 MMC Mined (last 24 hours)
You raised your HPM only 5-6 hours ago. Please look at your stats thoughtfully!
You can interpolate your earnings to 24 hours: ~56 MMC per block * 15 blocks * (24 hours / 6 hours) = ~3360 MMC. Just wait 18 hours and you will see it.
-
HPM (estimated) 4623.20
1640.0249 MMC Mined (last 24 hours)
You raised your HPM only 5-6 hours ago. Please look at your stats thoughtfully!
You can interpolate your earnings to 24 hours: ~56 MMC per block * 15 blocks * (24 hours / 6 hours) = ~3360 MMC. Just wait 18 hours and you will see it.
Well you are confirming what I have been saying.
24hr expected rate of earnings for 4600 hpm using just the last 24hr avg diff is ~4400 MMC according to this estimation calc: http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html
This is why I am asking yet again, is the pool really running at 40-50% "badluck" for the last 24hrs ? Either that or I am receiving far less per block than I should.
There is on average 10blocks per hour x 24hrs = 51840 MMC generated per day. From what I can see mmcpool is about 30% network hashrate meaning mmcpool should at expected rate generate 15552 MMC per 24hrs / 648 MMC per hour. So if this is all true then given I am getting 28% per block right now reported on mmcpool then I should in effect average 181.44 MMC per hour / 4354.56 MMC per day.
My calc match the online calc by agran, so I am curious why you mentioned 3360 MMC.
Im not trying to point fingers at you so dont get me wrong here, just need to understand why the earnings is so low, if there is something wrong with the pool in general or if its purely complete and utter bad luck to the extreme. :/
-
This is why I am asking yet again, is the pool really running at 40-50% "badluck" for the last 24hrs ? Either that or I am receiving far less per block than I should.
I don't know how the calculator calculates an income.
Also take into account that network doesn't find 1440/6=244 blocks per day. Current block is 8640. 24 hours ago is 8417. Only 223 blocks have been found for 24 hours. You can subtract from your income 223/244 = ~10%.
-
This is why I am asking yet again, is the pool really running at 40-50% "badluck" for the last 24hrs ? Either that or I am receiving far less per block than I should.
I don't know how the calculator calculates an income.
Also take into account that network doesn't find 1440/6=244 blocks per day. Current block is 8640. 24 hours ago is 8417. Only 223 blocks have been found for 24 hours. You can subtract from your income 223/244 = ~10%.
Network is finding 10 blocks per hour on average in 24hrs(or tries to atleast). I agree that network wide over last 24hrs its been finding blocks about ~10% less than optimal due to the constant hashrate dropping/diff readjusting downwards.
10% fluctuation is fine, but I am still trying to figure out if mmcpool is having absurd badluck for the last 24hrs cause at 10% less it should have found 2.7 blocks per hour but looking at last 24hrs mmcpool had 1.75 Blocks per hour.
So I guess I answered the question myself, that is ~64% of expected block hit rate per hour, extremely unlucky o_0.
-
Over the last 24hrs I have stayed between 4000-6000 hpm continously however the 24hr earnings is beyond possibility I would say.
I dont see how the pool could have averaged at 33% expected rate.
HPM (estimated) 4623.20
1640.0249 MMC Mined (last 24 hours)
Where did you get such a hashrate?
-
Over the last 24hrs I have stayed between 4000-6000 hpm continously however the 24hr earnings is beyond possibility I would say.
I dont see how the pool could have averaged at 33% expected rate.
HPM (estimated) 4623.20
1640.0249 MMC Mined (last 24 hours)
Just part of my farm, Santa delivered it to me since 2010 :p
Where did you get such a hashrate?
-
Over the last 24hrs I have stayed between 4000-6000 hpm continously however the 24hr earnings is beyond possibility I would say.
I dont see how the pool could have averaged at 33% expected rate.
HPM (estimated) 4623.20
1640.0249 MMC Mined (last 24 hours)
Just part of my farm, Santa delivered it to me since 2010 :p
Where did you get such a hashrate?
What details farm?
-
Am trying to run yam on my mac and getting this -- any ideas?
grohmacbook:yam oldgrohmacbook$ ./yam -c myconfig.cfg
YAM - Yet Another Miner by yvg1900
yam M7j-macos64-core2/yvg1900
***************************************************
* Supported coins: PTS *
* Author: yvg1900 (Twitter @yvg1900) *
* XPT protocol: jh (http://ypool.net) *
* *
* Addresses for Thanks and Donations: *
* PTS: PZxsEQoiMeB6tHcW2ZySBEiCPio1WkxbEL *
* XPM: AW2388DEWNEfMH4rP9kcj9yKcMq1QywYT4 *
* DTC: D6PmUogMigWvXurgFTqm5VLxQeVpXdYQj3 *
* MMC: MVk7PuJCa9o6qTYeiQRJDd3uHxKXMrQuU6 *
* LTC: Lby4YjhcAxhmbsdHFb4nYydrwGoiJezZt1 *
* BTC: 1FxekeK5La7AuF3oxiLzPKnjXyLMrux6VT *
* NMC: N9KXqmzEqP7gB2dGHpEZiRMgFjUHNM38FR *
***************************************************
Loading config file [myconfig.cfg]
Miner version: yam M7j-macos64-core2/yvg1900
Warning: Huge Pages not available in MacOS X version, performance may be lower than on Linux and Windows versions
Checking target [getwork://MHAi1Ej57ycJRHF2D3QU4u9RoSX2awgFKT@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc]...
Target OK
Checking params [mmc:av=1&aesni=on]...
Params OK
Checking MMC Stage 1 optimizations compatibility...
Checking MMC Stage 2 optimizations compatibility...
Illegal instruction: 4
-
Illegal instruction: 4
Your MAC's CPU is too old. Try to remove "&aesni=on".
-
Hello!
Someone gets sometimes errors when connecting to the pool?
I use yvg1900's yam miner.
For example:
(http://i7.pixs.ru/thumbs/9/0/4/SnimokJPG_8246548_10609904.jpg) (http://pixs.ru/showimage/SnimokJPG_8246548_10609904.jpg)
I dont get error when use another pool as primary.
-
Hello!
Someone gets sometimes errors when connecting to the pool?
I use yvg1900's yam miner.
For example:
(http://i7.pixs.ru/thumbs/9/0/4/SnimokJPG_8246548_10609904.jpg) (http://pixs.ru/showimage/SnimokJPG_8246548_10609904.jpg)
I dont get error when use another pool as primary.
I'm having the same connection issues !
-
Why is there is difference between HPM displayed in the pool and HPm displayed by the miner in the server?
-
I have a Core i5 M430 processor. Yam miner gives the error. Processor is not compatible with you?
-
hello, is the server OK? One of my miner is getting many
"
Share found!
Error: Share submission failed - No connection to server
Info: Reconnect to [work.mmcpool.com:80] in 41 seconds
"
:(
-
hello, is the server OK? One of my miner is getting many
Error: Share submission failed - No connection to server
I think there is a problem on the server.
I switched my miners to another pool.
Maybe I'll come back later.
-
MMCPool hosted in Germany, Hetzner DC. It runs fine. If you have connectivity problems please try another pool: mmc.1gh.com. Or you can use it as backup pool in yam miner.
Also please do not use port 80 - I'll remove it soon. i.e. keep only 8880-8883 in your config. Thanks!
-
MMCPool hosted in Germany, Hetzner DC. It runs fine. If you have connectivity problems please try another pool: mmc.1gh.com. Or you can use it as backup pool in yam miner.
Also please do not use port 80 - I'll remove it soon. i.e. keep only 8880-8883 in your config. Thanks!
hi, just FYI, port 80 is the default in the yam miner configuration :P
-
hi, thank you for the great pool! A friendly suggestion : maybe you could consider
turning down the pool fee to something like 3.0% and/or add some promotions,
so as to compete with 1gh.com and therefore contribute to make the network
more balanced? ::)
-
MMCPool hosted in Germany, Hetzner DC. It runs fine. If you have connectivity problems please try another pool: mmc.1gh.com. Or you can use it as backup pool in yam miner.
Also please do not use port 80 - I'll remove it soon. i.e. keep only 8880-8883 in your config. Thanks!
1. I will change port priority - will move 80 to the back of the queue.
2. It seems that on the application level there may be some slowdowns. I performed massive investigation today, and discovered that this is miner closing connection after not receivibg anything from the pool after 5 seconds timeout. I will try with longer timeouts now and let you know my results. In worst case I will make this timeout configurable on connection level, so users can increase it.
yvg1900
-
I have a Core i5 M430 processor. Yam miner gives the error. Processor is not compatible with you?
Any idea?
-
I have a Core i5 M430 processor. Yam miner gives the error. Processor is not compatible with you?
Any idea?
This CPU does not have AES-NI support. You shall switch off AES-NI support in mining parameters. Check readme.txt for information how to do this.
-
Windows 7 x64
INTEL(R)_CORE(TM)_I5-3570K_CPU_@_3.40GHZ Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
16 Gb Ram
yam-mmc.cfg:
threads = 0
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=on
mine = getwork://MTb1JHjoJCSJBjTLUgqeyJ1nXxYxBRJEUX@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
mine = getwork://MSkLPYJQuskzp8wNqvZCpiTNYw7pJ83zGe@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
mine = getwork://yvg1900.mmc_1:x@mmc.gpools.com:8080/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
win64-core2\yam.exe -c yam-mmc.cfg
Miner version: yam M7j-win64-core2/yvg1900
Error: Can not enable [SeLockMemoryPrivilege] privilege, error=1300
Warning: Huge Pages not available, performance may degrade
Error: At least one mining target shall be defined with --mine parameter
What am I doing wrong?
-
yvg1900,
Is there an archive with the previous versions of yam? I'm starting to test the new version but it seems that on some architectures, the older version was faster. Although reducing memory to 1 Gb is a great achievement, I'm all after speed now.
Thanks!
-
xeon 2650 server with 6 gb ram how much hash can you get?
-
yvg1900,
Is there an archive with the previous versions of yam? I'm starting to test the new version but it seems that on some architectures, the older version was faster. Although reducing memory to 1 Gb is a great achievement, I'm all after speed now.
Thanks!
I do not support old versions. There are other improvements in new version, so I recommend sticking to it.
If it really underperforms, we shall try to find out what is exact reason for that - I carefully test any possible perf degradation case, and new versions shall be working AT LEAST as goood as previous ones.
You may wish to set m=1024*numberOfThreads and ensure miner allocated threads = workers (you will see these numbers clearly indicated). If that is the case, miner shall use EXACTLY the code from previous version. If not - let me know exact config of your system and I will make more tests.
yvg1900
-
The last version works great form me...18.6 hpm and 0 disconnections !
-
The last version works great form me...18.6 hpm and 0 disconnections !
Which version?
-
The last version works great form me...18.6 hpm and 0 disconnections !
Which version?
i'm using yam miner version "K" and from my pow lowering the memory requirements is a blessing hand :)
Now I can using memory page lock, splitting the two instance between the numa node, taking full advantage from HT with only 12Gb for 24 threads.
I've also noticed that the cpu run cooler and I got a little cpu boost...my ART was 43xxx now is 35xxx !
-
What does Idle? No connection?
mmcpool.1gh.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 4, Accepted 4
work.mmcpool.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
mmc.gpools.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
-
Idle = No connection, standby to be used as backup pool of higher priority pool conn will break.
-
Block reward: 195.53 :'(
-
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
Can you give us hashes to verify the download?
I downloaded 'yam-yvg1900-M7k-win64-generic.zip' and get this:
sha256: ace052309acccb2071c2f5c3379e1b5ff4cf66c98a938e4b3f9a2ad3946f97e0
sha1: 34702481d765bf7770f82cc9db3fb96c12153f2f
md5: 2fba488e0c968f8c0558998512c69fc4
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/ace052309acccb2071c2f5c3379e1b5ff4cf66c98a938e4b3f9a2ad3946f97e0/analysis/
http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/7df4bf83275fafafedd70209748f12063d67f6f6
-
If you pay slightly more attention to content of dropbox folder or other download areas, you'll see md5 sums and wallet digital signatures for all the files. So it is there from the Day 1.
-
Hi, I started with task scheduler bat files can I view?
-
I have AMD processor AMD Opteron 4171 HE
Not running at full polschnost program crashes when aesni=on
When aesni=off everything is fine, but HPM:0.5
What can we do?
-
how do you put cfg file with executable file(is this the application file ) are we talking about putting it in same file like you do for minerd is so the application closes as soon as opened. on memerycoin site it says to run them but im not givin the option to run
-
Something erong with my account,
http://mmcpool.com/en/user?wallet=MEK1psi5EZ1C3DAZwBnGmTECTAmzcod2JN it says 4.38 paid (at this moment) but i only got 1.090 on my account.
Just 2 transactions are made, the numbers:
f13dce7d78ac30445f65877f7a87e78287e57b0710d60e0a7db88fe1a6841aec-000
10164ddd48d5d97fe70afd1fbf474d032c38bab99ff37dd699f8f5dfd8104be9-000
Nothing more, can someone check it for me please?
Thank you
-
It's all on the blockchain
http://mmc-chain.com/?engine=blockexplorer&address=MEK1psi5EZ1C3DAZwBnGmTECTAmzcod2JN
Is your wallet synced (Block 13085)?
-
I'm, not sure about that,
The wallet status say ''updated'' 12942 blocks in the history (at this moment).
What can i do?
Thank for the help
-
LOL i think it was solved,
I close the wallet and start it again, it show now, updating, 24 hours left.
Thank you in advance, André Brito
PS: Hate those captchas to comment.
-
It's a known issue that the wallet stops syncing sometimes when the included miner is running. Doesn't affect your payouts, only what the wallet displays :)
You can always check your address on the block explorer (mmc-chain.com) or agran's site (http://agran.net/mmc_getbalance.php).
The captchas are only there for a few posts, 3 or 5, I don't remember.
-
I don't seem to be getting submitting any shares with the GPU miner. Here's my output:
15:59:14.873 [0] 116.16 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 220.58 R/m, 0/90 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:15.304 [0] 116.37 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 220.58 R/m, 0/91 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:15.705 [0] 116.65 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 249.99 R/m, 0/92 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:16.103 [0] 116.94 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 248.95 R/m, 0/93 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:16.502 [0] 117.21 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 249.99 R/m, 0/94 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:16.931 [0] 117.41 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/95 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:17.359 [0] 117.61 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 220.58 R/m, 0/96 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:17.788 [0] 117.80 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/97 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:18.218 [0] 117.99 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 220.58 R/m, 0/98 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:18.644 [0] 118.19 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 220.58 R/m, 0/99 H/R, 0/0 A/R
15:59:19.073 [0] 118.37 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/100 H/R, 0/0 A/R
...
16:00:25.654 [0] 122.79 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 247.92 R/m, 0/240 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:26.049 [0] 122.89 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 248.95 R/m, 0/241 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:26.493 [0] 122.94 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/242 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:26.889 [0] 123.03 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 248.95 R/m, 0/243 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:27.318 [0] 123.09 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/244 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:27.766 [0] 123.13 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/245 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:28.160 [0] 123.23 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 248.95 R/m, 0/246 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:28.590 [0] 123.29 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/247 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:29.023 [0] 123.34 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 218.97 R/m, 0/248 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:29.456 [0] 123.40 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/249 H/R, 0/0 A/R
16:00:29.885 [0] 123.46 R/m, 0.000 Sh/m, last 219.77 R/m, 0/250 H/R, 0/0 A/R
And my MMCPool wallet isn't showing me as connected when this is running. Any ideas as to what the problem might be?
My current config:
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
minerd-mmc.exe M9XKTMyfpJBZYcJdfHgsqWceBU4A4mfDTc
-
I'm having trouble to mine in mmcpool. When I launch the minerd, there's some fast hashing and then I get the following lines:
}
[2014-02-07 18:45:41] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-02-07 18:45:41] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2014-02-07 18:46:12] JSON-RPC call failed: {
"message": "upstream RPC error",
"code": -4
}
I tried it in several machines (both linux and windows), and in every one of them there's the same output.
I'm missing something? Is neccesary to have installed the bitcoin daemon (bitcoind)?
The command line is as follows:
minerd -o http://work.mmcpool.com:8880 -u MyMemoryCoinAddress
ps: I tried the commandline as above but without the "http" with the same result.
-
I tried it in several machines (both linux and windows), and in every one of them there's the same output.
Hm. It was temporary error due to very high server load.
-
I have two Ubuntu 13.10 server with 4-4 Tesla K20X card and I got the following error:
09:26:24.921 [GPU0] Platform: NVIDIA CUDA
09:26:24.922 [GPU0] Device: Tesla K20Xm
09:26:24.922 [GPU0] Total device memory: 5759 MB
09:26:24.922 [GPU0] Maximum buffer size: 1439 MB
09:26:24.922 [GPU0] Global memory size is more than 2048MB - best performance
09:26:25.111 [GPU0] initialized successfully
Floating point exception (core dumped)
Any idea?
I can offer a few coins to whoever solves this problem.
MT
-
Is the Wallet Miner no longer working?
A few days ago it still did, today I see no CPU usage increase when I run the mining.
-
Hello new here and not that technically able yet.
Have got minerd = MC2miner from www.mmcpool.com running on my Acer Aspire 5553 Notebook, 2.0ghz, Amd phenom II x4 Mobile processor n930, 8gb ram, ati Mobility Radion HD4250 graphics (so no help there), Window 7.
http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-Phenom%20II%20Quad-Core%20Mobile%20N930%20-%20HMN930DCR42GM.html
Only getting Stats 0.342 H/M ish..
Cannot get Yam to work. Can any one help with the correct details and bat file?
Also shame no one put this on the front of MC2miner minerd, would be easier for new people to use, I think https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=67.0
Cheers in advance..
-
n00b question!
Can i mine with many "workers" to the same wallet adress?
cheers
~F
-
n00b question!
Can i mine with many "workers" to the same wallet adress?
cheers
~F
Yes you can
-
That means this error?
C:\miner\mmcpool-gpu-miner-windows-x64>set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
C:\miner\mmcpool-gpu-miner-windows-x64>minerd-mmc.exe MEMAxx4baBgxfjSniAEB86G4PE
gaSRGR3F
12:51:13.438 [GPU0] Platform: NVIDIA CUDA
12:51:13.439 [GPU0] Device: GeForce GTX 470
12:51:13.439 [GPU0] Total device memory: 1280 MB
12:51:13.439 [GPU0] Maximum buffer size: 320 MB
12:51:13.439 [GPU0] Cannot use the device! Global memory size is less than 1536M
B
12:51:13.439 [GPU1] Device not found
12:51:13.439 Started 0 miner threads
-
That means this error?
C:\miner\mmcpool-gpu-miner-windows-x64>set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
C:\miner\mmcpool-gpu-miner-windows-x64>minerd-mmc.exe MEMAxx4baBgxfjSniAEB86G4PE
gaSRGR3F
12:51:13.438 [GPU0] Platform: NVIDIA CUDA
12:51:13.439 [GPU0] Device: GeForce GTX 470
12:51:13.439 [GPU0] Total device memory: 1280 MB
12:51:13.439 [GPU0] Maximum buffer size: 320 MB
12:51:13.439 [GPU0] Cannot use the device! Global memory size is less than 1536M
B
12:51:13.439 [GPU1] Device not found
12:51:13.439 Started 0 miner threads
You need more than 1.5GB of GPU RAM to run the miner.
-
I can't use yam in centos5 ,the error info is kernel is too old.
-
Hi all,
im new in this mining business and wants to try with my server at home but i think the HPM is not very high. Can you help me. Here my Data/Config..
OS: Windows 2008 R2 64 Bit
2 * Xeon L5520 CPU
32 GB Ram
Huges pages are acitivated for Administrators (no error message appears)
Also restarted the server
Config:
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=off&m=1024
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
(yam.exe from the dropbox for yam-yvg1900-M7m-win64-nehalem.zip)
yam.exe --config yam-mmc.cfg --mine getwork://[%coin]@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
16 Mining Threads as 1 wokers
MMC Agg. SPM: 0.544, HPM: ?; Rnds C/I: 0/1, Don. C/I: 1/2; Cfg/Wkr
SPM: 0.544/0.9124, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 0.456/0.4562 1 rnds AV=1, ART=?
mmcpool.1gh.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
So the HPM Values seams not very high or?
Thx,
Sebi
-
Hi all,
im new in this mining business and wants to try with my server at home but i think the HPM is not very high. Can you help me. Here my Data/Config..
OS: Windows 2008 R2 64 Bit
2 * Xeon L5520 CPU
32 GB Ram
Huges pages are acitivated for Administrators (no error message appears)
Also restarted the server
Config:
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=off&m=1024
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
(yam.exe from the dropbox for yam-yvg1900-M7m-win64-nehalem.zip)
yam.exe --config yam-mmc.cfg --mine getwork://[%coin]@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
16 Mining Threads as 1 wokers
MMC Agg. SPM: 0.544, HPM: ?; Rnds C/I: 0/1, Don. C/I: 1/2; Cfg/Wkr
SPM: 0.544/0.9124, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 0.456/0.4562 1 rnds AV=1, ART=?
mmcpool.1gh.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
So the HPM Values seams not very high or?
Thx,
Sebi
L5520 does not support AES-NI.
HPM will be slower. I suggest grabbing an L5639 counterpart if you can because that supports aesni.
Try multiplying 1024 by the # of threads and set that as the m variable.
-
thx delin
Hm shit i got 3 of HP servers here in a friend company and they only use it as a file server. power/watt will be not the problem. So no chance for cpu mining?
so you sugest for every woker one processor with 1 gb ram?
***
One question? AES will never be supported or?
***
Wiki :-(. Will and was never supported. any other cpu mining chance? other proposals i think NO :-)
thx
-
thx delin
Hm shit i got 3 of HP servers here in a friend company and they only use it as a file server. power/watt will be not the problem. So no chance for cpu mining?
so you sugest for every woker one processor with 1 gb ram?
***
One question? AES will never be supported or?
***
Wiki :-(. Will and was never supported. any other cpu mining chance? other proposals i think NO :-)
thx
You can still mine at a massive degradation with aesni=off.
I haven't done any testing, but regardless of AESNI, the more ram you allocate, the faster it will mine.
AES-NI is a technology that new processors utilize to speed up AES instructions. I believe FreeTrade used this algorithm to prevent botnets and attempt ASIC/GPU resistance.
-
How to build it for Ubuntu?
Yes, I cant get in to the pool. It says
Oh!
The wallet «MQsVnp7AUubUxxMAkKtFF4CVcksAexVuJq» you requested was not found in the database.
i e-mail and no reply. ty
-
How to build it for Ubuntu?
Yes, I cant get in to the pool. It says
Oh!
The wallet «MQsVnp7AUubUxxMAkKtFF4CVcksAexVuJq» you requested was not found in the database.
i e-mail and no reply. ty
I get that error only when my wallet address for the miner has some extra letters. Is your wallet address valid?
-
The connection to the pool is getting worse with every passing day. I have a lot of workers running here and I get about 70hpm when all are connected. However, lately the hpm is dropping below 40 as the connection to the servers keeps on dropping on all of my workers. This also causes a lot of rejected shares. See what I have on 1 of the servers for the past day:
Shares Submitted 3587, Accepted 3502
These are 85 rejected shares for less than a day and most of them are rejected due to the server connection failure and when it connects, the share is already obsolete. Please fix the connection issues so we can go back to mining like before :)
-
Have you tried dwarfpool?
Also I notice that my HPM drops after a couple days if I do not restart my miner.
Have you tried restarting to see if it clears up?
The connection to the pool is getting worse with every passing day. I have a lot of workers running here and I get about 70hpm when all are connected. However, lately the hpm is dropping below 40 as the connection to the servers keeps on dropping on all of my workers. This also causes a lot of rejected shares. See what I have on 1 of the servers for the past day:
Shares Submitted 3587, Accepted 3502
These are 85 rejected shares for less than a day and most of them are rejected due to the server connection failure and when it connects, the share is already obsolete. Please fix the connection issues so we can go back to mining like before :)
-
I will try that pool and see how it goes. I am also checking up on my servers (I work for the cloud company :D) from time to time and the HPM on the miners has not dropped. It is just that when the connection fails, it reconnects for about 30-40 seconds, during which you are just not mining and not sending shares, so the HPM reported by the pool drops.
-
That can be expensive downtime when you are paying for those servers. I see your issue.
I will try that pool and see how it goes. I am also checking up on my servers (I work for the cloud company :D) from time to time and the HPM on the miners has not dropped. It is just that when the connection fails, it reconnects for about 30-40 seconds, during which you are just not mining and not sending shares, so the HPM reported by the pool drops.
-
Hey Everyone!
So I'm totally new at this - been mining for 30 hours on an 8 core with the MMCPool, with AMD 4171HE 3ghz and 14gb ram. Using yam.
So far I'm not seeing any coins in memorycoin wallet.
Is this normal?
-
Hey Everyone!
So I'm totally new at this - been mining for 30 hours on an 8 core with the MMCPool, with AMD 4171HE 3ghz and 14gb ram. Using yam.
So far I'm not seeing any coins in memorycoin wallet.
Is this normal?
You are being paid for every 0.5 MMC you mine. So you should have gotten something already. I suggest that you check the UUID of the your wallet address and verify it is the same in the yam config. You can also go to http://mmcpool.com/en and enter your wallet UUID and see how much you have been mining.
-
Hey Everyone!
So I'm totally new at this - been mining for 30 hours on an 8 core with the MMCPool, with AMD 4171HE 3ghz and 14gb ram. Using yam.
So far I'm not seeing any coins in memorycoin wallet.
Is this normal?
yes, newly mined blocks will be confirmed after 8 hours.
for you to see the mined coins in your wallet, you have to wait the found blocks to be confirmed. after your confirmed total balance reaches 0.5 MMC you will be paid by the pool.
-
Hmmm…I must be doing something very wrong. I installed the MMC wallet and clicked on "Launch Pool Miner" - I didn't touch any of the yam config files.
BUT - looking at "user earnings" on mmcpool.com here is what I get:
0.0000 MMC Paid
0.1677 MMC Current balance
0.0846 MMC Unconfirmed
STATS
NO Connected
0.53 HPM (estimated)
0.2523 MMC Mined (last 24 hours)
In 24 hours, with 8 core of 4171HE at 3ghz and 14gb ram I've only mined .2523 MMC.
Does this sound accurate? Did I screw something up?
Thanks for your help!
-
Hey Everyone!
So I'm totally new at this - been mining for 30 hours on an 8 core with the MMCPool, with AMD 4171HE 3ghz and 14gb ram. Using yam.
So far I'm not seeing any coins in memorycoin wallet.
Is this normal?
You are being paid for every 0.5 MMC you mine. So you should have gotten something already. I suggest that you check the UUID of the your wallet address and verify it is the same in the yam config. You can also go to http://mmcpool.com/en and enter your wallet UUID and see how much you have been mining.
Exactly!
-
Hmmm…I must be doing something very wrong. I installed the MMC wallet and clicked on "Launch Pool Miner" - I didn't touch any of the yam config files.
BUT - looking at "user earnings" on mmcpool.com here is what I get:
0.0000 MMC Paid
0.1677 MMC Current balance
0.0846 MMC Unconfirmed
STATS
NO Connected
0.53 HPM (estimated)
0.2523 MMC Mined (last 24 hours)
In 24 hours, with 8 core of 4171HE at 3ghz and 14gb ram I've only mined .2523 MMC.
Does this sound accurate? Did I screw something up?
Thanks for your help!
Please copy-paste log from yam miner.
-
Sorry, can't find a log file - this is it the built-in miner in the memory coin wallet.
-
Anyone have any idea?
./minerd-mmc: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./minerd-mmc)
./minerd-mmc: /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4: no version information available (required by ./minerd-mmc)
./minerd-mmc: /usr/lib64/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by ./minerd-mmc)
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Platform: NVIDIA CUDA
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Device: GeForce GT 640
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Total device memory: 2047 MB
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Maximum buffer size: 511 MB
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Driver reports maximum buffer size is less than 1024MB! We'll try to allocate 1GB anyway. It could work but we can't help if it doesn't.
05:08:55.946 [GPU0] initialized successfully
zsh: floating point exception ./minerd-mmc <...>
-
MMCPool was down for 7 hours.
Sorry for that, Ubuntu server has crashed with a kernel error.. :(
-
My CPU miners are behind a corporate firewall, do I need to specify incoming ports for the wallet payout connections?
Thanks!
Jeff
-
Anyone have any idea?
./minerd-mmc: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./minerd-mmc)
./minerd-mmc: /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4: no version information available (required by ./minerd-mmc)
./minerd-mmc: /usr/lib64/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by ./minerd-mmc)
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Platform: NVIDIA CUDA
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Device: GeForce GT 640
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Total device memory: 2047 MB
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Maximum buffer size: 511 MB
05:08:55.880 [GPU0] Driver reports maximum buffer size is less than 1024MB! We'll try to allocate 1GB anyway. It could work but we can't help if it doesn't.
05:08:55.946 [GPU0] initialized successfully
zsh: floating point exception ./minerd-mmc <...>
I have the same card and same problems. did you fix it? If so how please.
-
Hello,
MMC WALLET mains timesync with a does not fall.1 week's end were gained in this way, mmc s for this reason I do not come to your wallet.
When I enter a wallet MMC: warning: May not be displayed Transactions correct! you may need to upgrade, or to other nodes may need to uprag wallet How do I update this article I see?
-
i think the pool is down.....
-
yeah I have the same problem today... can't connect to the pool. it sucks. :'(
-
:'( Pool was down. Sorry for the downtime.
-
hello glitchboy! :) is it still down ? for how long do you think it will be down ?
thx !! :P
-
During the down time of mmcpool, please have a try of our p2pool http://mmcexplorer.info/p2pool
just add the line to your yam-mmc.cfg
mine = stratum+tcp://MMCADDRESS@P2POOLNODE:8080/mmc
-
My pc frezzes or crash all the time
yam.exe --config yam-mmc.cfg --mine getwork://mmc.adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
threads = 12
mining-params = mmc:av=0&aesni=on&m=6144
mine = getwork://mmc.adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
#proxy = socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
I have also tried with threads 1 and av=1 m=1024
any ideas?
-
My pc frezzes or crash all the time
yam.exe --config yam-mmc.cfg --mine getwork://mmc.adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
threads = 12
mining-params = mmc:av=0&aesni=on&m=6144
mine = getwork://mmc.adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
#proxy = socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
I have also tried with threads 1 and av=1 m=1024
any ideas?
Try aesni=off
-
so far its working but my hpm is low only about 0.5 with 6 threads and m=6144
-
its because your processor dont support aesni :(
-
hello
i found yam miner great but not working my i3-2120 sandy-bridge win 7 x64 home premium with sp1 i start the miner and crash windows says yam.exe shuting down
i use yam-yvg1900-M7q-win64-sandy-bridge
but i try generic version and working but i think slow
my cfg :
threads = 4
mining-params = grs:av=0&donation-interval=50
mine = stratum+tcp://echo00114.2:xx@grs.cpu-pool.net:3650/grs
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
#proxy = socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
any ideas why not working sandy bridge wersion i try 3 machine same config also not working.
thanx
-
your configuration are mining another coin then memorycoin.
If Sandy-bridge is not working try with other cpu software. In one of the first version of yam i have one version that work fine and with last version i use a differente cpu release. Just test ;)
-
your configuration are mining another coin then memorycoin.
If Sandy-bridge is not working try with other cpu software. In one of the first version of yam i have one version that work fine and with last version i use a differente cpu release. Just test ;)
hello
sorry my english not perfect what version test ? another arhitecture yam or what another yam version ? i search oldest yam but not found
i test all version off yam only generic working :(
update 2 : core 2 version of yam also working i3-2120 and i3 2100 this coins grs speed 500 khs of yam-yvg1900-M7q-win64-core2
bye
-
I replied in another thread. Your CPU supports AVX, but does not support AES-NI. AES-NI needed for both GRS and MMC, but for MMC you can explicilty turn it on or off, while for GRS there is no such possibility. It would be really great if you also check readme.txt and other documentation files provided with a miner - they all contain a lot of very useful information.
Thanks.
-
I have been looking at my system and its
Intel Core i7-2600K
Sandy Bridge-DT XE
ATI/AMD Radeon HD 6970
so my system should support aes
-
My pc frezzes or crash all the time
yam.exe --config yam-mmc.cfg --mine getwork://mmc.adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
threads = 12
mining-params = mmc:av=0&aesni=on&m=6144
mine = getwork://mmc.adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
#proxy = socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
I have also tried with threads 1 and av=1 m=1024
My system is
Intel Core i7-2600K
Sandy Bridge-DT XE
ATI/AMD Radeon HD 6970
any ideas?
-
My pc frezzes or crash all the time
yam.exe --config yam-mmc.cfg --mine getwork://mmc.adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
threads = 12
mining-params = mmc:av=0&aesni=on&m=6144
mine = getwork://mmc.adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
#proxy = socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
I have also tried with threads 1 and av=1 m=1024
My system is
Intel Core i7-2600K
Sandy Bridge-DT XE
ATI/AMD Radeon HD 6970
any ideas?
Consider decreasing the yam.exe priority to idle.
-
how do i set it to idle?
-
how do i set it to idle?
What Operating System do you use?
For windows, use task manager. Set the priority of the yam.exe process under 'Processes' to Idle of Below Average.
-
i have win7
i have just tried it and set it to below and low and it still frezze :(
-
i have win7
i have just tried it and set it to below and low and it still frezze :(
Decrease your Memory variable to about 1024. That's the minimum.
How much RAM do you have?
-
I have only 8gb ram
Now i have tried with only 1024 and it still crashes
-
I have only 8gb ram
Now i have tried with only 1024 and it still crashes
What CPU do you have? Did you install Service Pack 1?
-
Intel core i7-2600k and i have service pack 1
My new config is
threads=6
mining-params = mmc:av=0&aesni=on&m=1024
mine = getwork://Adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
#proxy = socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
-
Up until a couple of days ago, I was getting coins on a regular basis. Not much, mind you, but was still getting some. Then all of a sudden, nothing. Its been 3 days now. I am not sure what has happened. I put a new install on another computer with a completely different wallet address. Nothing. Its been two days of that. Checked miner to make sure addresses match, its all good.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Addresses: MPWSc16D2cCoFd7WaqsaUA14cEtpXEZbGa and MX1jG1zsB9XvFseTg9yv6vqTwULyc8Zk2s (this is the newest one and the one which my miners are mining to)
Wallet Ver: v0.8.583.0-unk-beta
**UPDATING to .584** I will report back once it syncs up. Thanks.
***UPDATE!!*** Since upgrade to .584 and downloading the blockchain from scratch, all transactions are coming through with no issues. I think that Poloniex might have to update their wallet because nothing I send there makes it through.
-
Intel core i7-2600k and i have service pack 1
My new config is
threads=6
mining-params = mmc:av=0&aesni=on&m=1024
mine = getwork://Adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
#proxy = socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
You have to change 'Adress' to your MMC Wallet Address.
Up until a couple of days ago, I was getting coins on a regular basis. Not much, mind you, but was still getting some. Then all of a sudden, nothing. Its been 3 days now. I am not sure what has happened. I put a new install on another computer with a completely different wallet address. Nothing. Its been two days of that. Checked miner to make sure addresses match, its all good.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Addresses: MPWSc16D2cCoFd7WaqsaUA14cEtpXEZbGa and MX1jG1zsB9XvFseTg9yv6vqTwULyc8Zk2s (this is the newest one and the one which my miners are mining to)
Wallet Ver: v0.8.583.0-unk-beta
**UPDATING to .584** I will report back once it syncs up. Thanks.
***UPDATE!!*** Since upgrade to .584 and downloading the blockchain from scratch, all transactions are coming through with no issues. I think that Poloniex might have to update their wallet because nothing I send there makes it through.
I sent poloniex an email a few days ago. Hopefully they will get to the wallet update.
There are 0% p2pools available in the Memorycoin Miner union at http://mmcpools.com
-
A similar problem, the pool does not send the money.
Poole disappeared from the charts
http://s4l1h.github.io/mmc/
What's going on?
-
of course i have my MMC Wallet Address.
-
A similar problem, the pool does not send the money.
Poole disappeared from the charts
http://s4l1h.github.io/mmc/
What's going on?
You must update your wallet to the latest version here (https://www.mmc-square.com/memorycoin-applications/33/memorycoin-wallet-version-0-8-54b/146/)
I've sent another message to s4l1h to make sure his node is updated, I believe the charts are incorrect.
of course i have my MMC Wallet Address.
Which YAM version are you using?
-
I am using yam M7q-win64-sandy-bridge/yvg1900
-
You can assign 8 cores to the miner,
Try the win64 generic version to see if it works.
-
same result :( i am thinking that i have a fault in my cpu
-
Try using the last version of yam.
-
Now it says:
Checking params [mmc:av=1&aesni=on&m=4096&donation-interval=50]...
Error: Parameter [m] value [4096] is invalid, maximal value allowed for 0 thread
s is 0
and my config is
threads = 4
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=on&m=4096&donation-interval=50
mine = getwork://Adress@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
#proxy = socks4a://127.0.0.1:9150
#proxy = socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
-
Try using 1024 in memory, just to have sure it will work.
-
same result
I have also tried on low
-
i have download the last version and got the same error.
please download the last version that is in mmc-square, its working and is the version i use.
https://www.mmc-square.com/miners-library/28/cpu-yam-mmc-cpu-miner-version-r-windows-linux-and-mac/41/
-
i get error code
Checking params [mmc:av=1&aesni=on&m=6144]...
Error: Parameter [m] value [6144] is invalid, maximal value allowed for 0 thread
s is 0
and my config is
threads = 12
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=on&m=6144
-
i get error code
Checking params [mmc:av=1&aesni=on&m=6144]...
Error: Parameter [m] value [6144] is invalid, maximal value allowed for 0 thread
s is 0
and my config is
threads = 12
mining-params = mmc:av=1&aesni=on&m=6144
Yes sorry version S has a problem mining MMC,
Yvg updated the YAM miner on his dropbox and I will update the YAM version shortly to version T. (with MMC mining fixed),
-
I have now tried sandy-bridge and generic version T and my pc still crashes :(
-
I have now tried sandy-bridge and generic version T and my pc still crashes :(
Please PM me all your hardware specs so I may assist you personally.
-
MMCPool CPU and GPU miners have not been updated for the v3 hard fork and do not collect work, and the User Earnings page has also stopped updating. Is there a fix in the works?
For the record, I generally CPU mine using the YAM customized miner, which did get an update 4 days ago. I continue to use the MMCPool GPU miner but at the moment can't task that portion of my mining rig.
-
MMCPool CPU and GPU miners have not been updated for the v3 hard fork and do not collect work, and the User Earnings page has also stopped updating. Is there a fix in the works?
For the record, I generally CPU mine using the YAM customized miner, which did get an update 4 days ago. I continue to use the MMCPool GPU miner but at the moment can't task that portion of my mining rig.
The pool only needs to update source code to continue accepting GPU shares:
-
The pool only needs to update source code to continue accepting GPU shares:
Is there an ETA as to when this code will be released?
-
Current net is running on code from github..
https://github.com/memorycoin/memorycoin
-
Pool down?
-
Pool down?
Pool does not support Memorycoin anymore.