Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wallace

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15
181
AGS fund the development of the toolkit. and the Social Consensus should not be broken.

the 3rd party DAC always have a choice no matter the new BTS exist or not. why we have a social consensus with 10% to agser and 10% to ptser but now become to 20% to BTSer? it doesn't make any sense.

182
这个还没有定论,现在英文区有帖子,大家把想法都在帖子里面说出来,我们不能坐以待毙!

183
General Discussion / Re: Explanation for PTS/AGS Holders goes here!
« on: October 22, 2014, 04:38:19 pm »
I don't think the social consensus applies to absorption/mergers.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10214.msg135831#msg135831

However, any future DAC's who wish to, it will be difficult because pre/post feb28 AGS/PTS now have different percentage stakes in its replacement.

Honoring 20% to BTS holders would honor the contract for pre 2/28 holders but not post 2/28 holders.

I think its established at this point that there is no way to make it perfect. This may be most fair though.  I don't have any better suggestions that don't tip the scale in some other unfair way.

for future DAC, I suggest we should keep the social consensus - at least 10% to AGSer and at least 10% to PTSer.

184
General Discussion / Re: Explanation for PTS/AGS Holders goes here!
« on: October 22, 2014, 04:27:25 pm »
Stan, what we're talking about is not about this merger, it's about the future 3rd Party DAC

185
General Discussion / Re: Will 3rd Party DACs honor PTS/AGS in the future?
« on: October 22, 2014, 03:57:37 pm »
As a PTS&AGS holder, I respect what 3I doing for the BTSX and totally agree with this proposal of this merger.

but I have a big concern about the future 3rd Party DAC, we need to keep the social consensus - at least 10% to AGSer and 10% PTSer. currently I didn't see any official response about this.

186
有一个词叫“双赢”

如果你理解不了这一点的话你就不要做投资了

187
仔细分析一下,其实这个提议的中心思想跟之前那个提议是一样的

188
支持将BTSX做成金融中心

189
1)BM計劃1000万美元的增發,導致btsx價格猛跌是肯定的,AGS可以流動了,這是對pts的持有者不公平。我不贊成他這個分配方案,但贊成他把pts/ags整合到btsx中去。BM計畫的變動需要發行5億左右的比特股,這是目前市場很難接受的
2)bm的方案对btsx持有者来说的确是无法接受的,因为手上的币被稀释了20%,市场永远没有1+1=2那么简单


AGSer+PTSer+BTSXer,我选3

我无法理解你说的对于btsx持有者来说的确是无法接受的,新的方案等于是无偿给了BTSXer所有整合进去的DAC的80%的快照,虽然市场没有1+1=2那么简单,但这个80%的价值不难算

190
同样AGSer+PTSer+BTSXer,我选5

191
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 关于PTS和BTSX之间的关系?
« on: September 26, 2014, 07:10:38 pm »
请教:

1)目前pts都已经快照了哪些dac? (我目前只兑换了btsx)

2)还有哪些没有拍照的?

3)类似这种消息从哪里可以获取?(防止错过拍照和兑换)

1. Lotto(已发布,Bter可交易,名称LTS), DNS(未发布), Vote(未发布)

2. Music, Play可能会是比较近的, 还有坛友正在做的JustDice,  以后可能还会有Charity, Cloud funding, Insurance, Lending...

3. 英文信息可以从本论坛获取,中文信息可以从www.bts.hk获取

192
中文 (Chinese) / Re: NuBits是什么机制?
« on: September 24, 2014, 08:53:30 am »
Nushare的分发机制是什么?没有答案,投资者可以买吗?没有答案

那这不就是个彻彻底底的私人钱庄嘛,看起来哈耶克的理论在几百年前已经被我们山西前辈实现了

既然是钱庄,那跟普通投资者就没有半毛钱的关系

我想说一句,那这还是DAC吗?打着DAC的幌子骗小白呢

193
中文 (Chinese) / Re: NuBits是什么机制?
« on: September 22, 2014, 08:05:12 pm »

就我那点ppc这么卖力来推销以便给ppc大户抬轿?我犯得着吗?
从主观上专门给ppc抹黑? 我还没那么变态。

老狼是老狼,你不能指望每个人的性格是一样的。

不要把别人的每一种行为都理解成铜臭气,还有一种动机是精神层面的,我作为旧btser当初在这个论坛表达对3i不满遭到”传销窝点”式的围攻。我这人挺记仇,今天专门过来告诉你们有一种更好的玩意,哪怕这种玩意与我没有一份钱的关系,我只要看到你们恐惧失望的表情就很满意了。各位,当初对btsx的质疑者留点口德,不至于让别人这么惦记,还是你们的心胸不够宽广。我当初又不是造谣,我只是表达作为btsx投资者对跳票和画饼的不满,很多人持有类似看法。

我还有350个AGS无法卖出,如何展示给你们看?

看来我们的反应让您失望了,斗胆预言一句,就你这性格,以后在PPC那里还会被围攻,您还会记仇的

194
原理上是可以的,但需要大量的BTSX, 现在内盘深度这么浅,这么做是作死,但在某些特定的时刻是有可能的,比如晚上睡觉的时候,如果时代上的买盘数量不够,而内盘又有很大的short单的时候

195
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 合资创建资产
« on: September 18, 2014, 08:08:54 am »
已支持!

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15