Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hadrian

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 32
151
Random Discussion / Lavaboom email
« on: July 11, 2015, 11:00:35 am »
Until BitShares has a solution implemented for everything, you may be interested in open-source-email-provider-to-be Lavaboom.

Quote
Lavaboom is a zero-knowledge email provider, the first of its kind.

It looks promising, and is in beta with the ability to reserve usernames.

Maybe you'd like to reserve 'BitShares_forum_handle@lavaboom.com'?

You may want to look here on reddit also.

152
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 11, 2015, 10:03:26 am »
From bytemaster's first post in this thread:
Quote
According to Wikipedia, brownie points are a hypothetical social currency, which can be acquired by doing good deeds or earning favor in the eyes of another.


And the description which pops up when hovering over the asset name on the exchange (on the BROWNIE.PTS:BTS page):
Quote
Brownie points in modern usage are a hypothetical social currency, which can be acquired by doing good deeds or earning favor in the eyes of another, often one's superior.
:P :P :P


By the way, this isn't bytemaster's addition, it's in the wikipedia quote:
Quote
Brownie points in modern usage are a hypothetical social currency, which can be acquired by doing good deeds or earning favor in the eyes of another, often one's superior.

I hope this was left in intentionally, because it's bloody brilliant! This is hilarious in the light of some people's thoughts on brownie nosing!

153
Random Discussion / Re: Off to the beach
« on: July 10, 2015, 10:30:36 pm »
I hope you have a good time. I'm going to have a guess at where you're going:
Weston-super-Mare? :P

154
General Discussion / Re: Hangout Attendance (Brownie PTS)
« on: July 10, 2015, 05:40:46 pm »
bts: hadrian

155
General Discussion / Re: Rust
« on: July 04, 2015, 09:53:00 pm »
Thanks.. the search through a lot of "trust" results :)

Let me give you a little trick on the best way to search for things on this forum:

https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Abitsharestalk.org+rust
+5%

156
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 02, 2015, 09:06:07 pm »
@bytemaster
A few things spring to mind with this subject:

  • Is it intended for the BROWNIE.PTS scheme to be ongoing, or is it short term with a specific aim in mind (perhaps to do with the launch of BitShares 2.0)?
    If it's going to be a long running thing, should we work on ideas to optimize the implementation? As far as the forum is concerned I'm thinking of various ideas relating to curated content. The Let's Talk Bitcoin user curation system would be one example. Or is this this sort of thing beyond the scope of your aims?
    If it's short term I guess you don't need it to be so intricate, but how are you going to assess posts on the forum? Is it all down to what you see and read? (By the way, now that we can '@' people on the forum, are you getting pestered too much? Any advice on when it is and isn't appropriate so we can avoid wasting your time?)
  • Do you need forum members to add their BTS name to their forum profile?

Oh sugar, I have to attend to a baby... I'll come back to this later with some more ideas if I can...
I hope you appreciate my thoughts  ;D

157
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 02, 2015, 08:01:47 pm »
I would like to give 1000 points per "block" for every forum member with more than 1 block.  (Heros, etc...) and I will give major points to someone who offers to hand them out.

Remember NameNarwhal? Do you think there will be a "block"Narwhal?

For anyone considering doing this, remember that with BROWNIE.PTS, what bytemaster giveth, bytemaster can taketh awayeth eth eth...

158
General Discussion / Re: BitShares + Bitcoin
« on: July 02, 2015, 02:42:25 pm »
STOP TEASING US!!
It's too intriguing.
I can't take the excitement.
My imagination's flitting...

GO ON, TEASE US SOME MORE!!

159
What amount of flexibility is allowed in the "Period Length" ? If it could be set to 1 hour I don't see a major issue. What about 1 a day?

If there is only one transaction allowed per period then there is a problem balancing two trade-offs:
  • If the period is long, there is no flexibility to allow for (even slightly) irregular payments. You must know that for the whole span, one payment will be required, and no more.
  • If the period is made shorter, this somewhat allows for unpredictably spaced payments. BUT there is a security risk as the payments can quickly stack up because of the short period.

In the debit card example in my post above, you may wish to buy something from a shop for $100 dollars, then 10 minutes later buy something elsewhere for $10. If the permissions allow $150 per hour and your card is stolen it could be very expensive ($3600 lost per day). If, however the permissions were set at $150 per day, you would, in this scenario, be unable to buy the second item (because you're restricted to one transaction per period).
THE FIX: If you could specify max. number of transactions per period you could set $150 per day with unlimited number of transactions. This would fix the problems and you could go shopping.


Another example:

Adam wants to allow his daughter Becky limited access to recurring payments from his BitShares account. Becky is moving out of the family home and Adam wishes her to have money available in case of emergency. If the period length is set as 1 month with $300 allowed, Becky could have two emergencies in a month and be unable to get access to money to cover the second emergency (even if she'd only taken $60 for the first emergency). If Adam sets the period length at 1 day the amount would have to be proportionately higher, say $100 (because $10 perhaps wouldn't cover an emergency). Then Becky could go out and spend $100 per day, costing Adam $3000 in a month.
THE FIX: Have the ability to set the period length at 1 month, the max. amount at $300, and the max. number of transactions at >1

160
The dev team needs to learn to multiply their time estimates by 2.5 before announcing them to the world. :P

Maybe they already do. Maybe it should be repeatedly multiplied by 2.5 until they are confident that there have been enough iterations of multiplication by a factor of 2.5, and then that result should be multiplied by 2.5? :P

(B.T.W. - this is not my true sentiment. I'm happy to wait for as long as it takes)

161
Technical Support / What happens to bitBTC if BTC forks?
« on: July 01, 2015, 10:31:09 pm »
I was listening to an interview with Mike Hearn talking about the block size debate which is going on with bitcoin.
I imagine it is possible that bitcoin could fork, such that there would, at least for a time, be no definite consensus on which was the 'real bitcoin'.

If this occurred, what would happen in the short term with bitBTC?

162
If the number of transactions was set from 1 to X, then you could use it for microtransactions.

The user could fund their account, and then the merchant could take small bits when needed for microtransactions.

Exactly - this is a good example. We're missing a great deal of functionality if this isn't implemented.

A shopper could have a debit card linked to a BitShares account. This "number of transactions" variable would allow someone to go shopping.

There are loads of other scenarios where this would be crucial...

Clarification is needed from someone to indicate whether or not BitShares 2.0 will be able to do this. And if not, why not?

163
edit: This is resolved - bytemaster says the "one transaction per period length" restriction was removed a while ago. The documentation is out of date.

Looking here on bitshares.org:

Quote
After a user grants the withdrawal permissions, the authorized account is allowed to make one transfer per period of an amount up to the limit.

Is there any reason for restricting it to one transfer? If there's no good reason, this is sub-optimal because it unnecessarily rules out certain use cases.

This is the list of properties for recurring payments on bitshares.org:

Quote
A withdrawal permission includes following properties:

  • Start Date
  • End Date
  • Withdrawal Limit per Period
  • Period Length (i.e. 1 month)

If it's not a mammoth technical problem, it would be a significant improvement to add:

5.  Maximum Number of Transactions per Period (from 1 to unlimited)


I'm assuming there must be a good reason for the restriction, and if this is the case, can someone tell me what it is?
I also assume that it's obvious why adding the "max. no. of transactions" variable would be better, but if this isn't the case I could elaborate with some examples...

164
Technical Support / Re: Freedom is indeed about choice…
« on: June 29, 2015, 10:42:26 pm »
Is that a "slippery slope" fallacy? It would be if I were not talking about historical fact, but since our "leaders" show they repeat this pattern it's not a fallacy but a warning, and I fear it will not be heeded.

We have one weapon you are not considering:  the ability to adapt!  We can fork and clone and sharedrop.

This is an arms race, with miles to go before we sleep.  (Apologies to Robert Frost.)

We need to consider what stepping stones may be needed to achieve freedom.

Fork to the left:  Provide a chain that banks and government lovers are more comfortable adopting.  Net result is more people get trained in the advantages of crypto.  But would any of us use it?  Really?  Not even to pay your cable bill?

Fork to the right: Provide a chain that has impregnable privacy to the point of total anonymity and ignores the current world order.  But how will value trickle into such a chain?

BitShares 2.0: Run the play right up the middle where left and right can trade with each other.  Government lovers (a pox be upon them) can first learn about crypto, then learn about freedom. 

Keep in mind that voluntary identity is a powerful force for civilization.  Why do you think small towns are more civilized than big cities?  Because reputation is an unbelievably important asset that you city-slickers can only dream about.

"I didn't see that, I only heard
But just to be sociable, I'll take your word" 
When I See an Elephant Fly
From "Dumbo"
Music and lyrics by Oliver Wallace and Ned Washington

Sometimes you want to go where everybody knows your name.

Could governments impose regulations whereby stocks and such can only be 'legally' issued on the "Fork to the left"? I'm thinking of legal restrictions leading to the creation of a chain which only operates in a compliant manner. What an ugly creature this would be... the "BitShares 2.0" chain is much prettier.
Has Cryptonomex scrapped the idea of the 'true' Bitshares 2.0 chain being the one with the highest market capitalization? I thought there used to be a statement about judging by market cap in this post.

165
Random Discussion / There's a weird on this forum!
« on: June 25, 2015, 09:49:48 pm »
 :)
Why, when I hover over the " :) ", as I compose a post, does the pop-up description say, "Hi, apparently this text is editable."?

Most of the other descriptions say things like, "Sad", or, "Shocked".

I'm hoping this isn't an indication of some kind of unauthorized hack, but rather just a curiosity...

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 32