526
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] HackTheDEX.io -- a BitShares Bug Bounty Program
« on: October 06, 2018, 01:13:12 am »
Any updates or blog posts about this WP's re-organization? Waiting for bug report feedback 👍
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Supported on my side under following conditions.Raised an UI issue for the 3rd item: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1932
1. Expiring proxy assignments (expiry period longer than proxy's decaying period)
2. Voting portal to counter voter apathy
3. Stateful notifications in UI or voting portal:
a) Prompt user to check/refresh his voting slate (if sufficiently decayed)
b) In case of user with proxy set, notifications when proxy modifies voting slate
Update:
Thanks to everyone + special thanks to whoever was yesterday deciding vote on worker to gets voted in.
We are creating today on github repository and team will start work/logging hours no more late than this Friday. Commits will be available only to the BitShares github team until admin decide/review what is for public release.
@abit
Pinged you on telegram - re Github Repository, Fabian is away, please check when you can.
If this is not stopped, this would prove that dpos is a fatally flawed system, which can be easily manipulated just like mtgox.
This second claim period will run for 30 days and end on October 25 at 23:59:59 UTC. Claims will be subject to a 5% reduction during this second claim period. Example: If your original sharedrop was 100 WLS, you will now receive 95 WLS.
MCR is not the key point, how to solve the black swan is the main problem.BSIP 18 does offer the ability to resolve global settlement aka 'black swan'. Just follow its steps and it'll reactivate.
BSIP 18 can't solve the black swan,we need other good way to solve the black swan, let the black swan will never happen.
The pegging thing can be solved with a program all committee members run that adjusts the fees daily to peg to USD/CNY. Obviously there's hassle in running that program and key safety is a concern as wellAfter BSIP 40 (https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0040.md) is implemented, the committee members could potentially create a key for this purpose so as to not risk the rest of their committee account's permissions/functionality.
It's also possible that the "if" will not happen. If the price of your order is competitive, IMHO it will be filled quite soon in a liquid market. Being able to buy a large amount without affecting the market trading price is a stupid design.The difference is that without force settlement there might as well be no backing collateral, especially if nobody buys your sell order entirely within 24hrs of placing it at/around the settlement price.In current situation, I concern more about forced settlements than black swan or global settlements. IMHO forced settlements are needed. For better user experience, perhaps we should match force-settle "orders" with limit orders when prices of limit orders are better than settlement price for the settler.
if then, why not disable force settlement and just let the users place buy orders in market if they want to convert bitCNY to BTS? what's the difference?
QuoteAlternative proposal - disable (permanently) the following centralized permissions in bitCNY/bitUSD:This is off-topic.
White list
Override authority
Transfer restricted
Disable force settle
Disable confidential
The difference is that without force settlement there might as well be no backing collateral, especially if nobody buys your sell order entirely within 24hrs of placing it at/around the settlement price.In current situation, I concern more about forced settlements than black swan or global settlements. IMHO forced settlements are needed. For better user experience, perhaps we should match force-settle "orders" with limit orders when prices of limit orders are better than settlement price for the settler.
if then, why not disable force settlement and just let the users place buy orders in market if they want to convert bitCNY to BTS? what's the difference?
The proposed operation enables potential investors to "bid" additional collateral for taking over part of the debt (or all of it). When enough bids have been made to cover the full outstanding debt, and all of them are sufficiently collateralized (in terms of price feed and MCR), the settlement_fund and the bids are turned into call positions. Finally, the settlement_price is removed from the asset, which revives it.
If the available bids cover more than the outstanding debt, bids with a higher collateral/debt ratio are preferred over those with a lower ratio. The intent is to turn the competition among investors into better collateralized calls, which is in the interest of the MPA holders.