76
General Discussion / Re: Display maximum risk reward every trade
« on: April 29, 2016, 03:04:29 am »How would you calculate these 2 values? Could you walk us through a simple example with real numbers ?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
What happened to the intention of switching this forum software over to discourse?
What are the stumble stones? Maybe both versions could be run parallel, for a while?
I have been thinking about the possible advantages these days,
and today I searched for a related thread here … Let's roll more!
One thing we already need to add to this one is a possibility to like or heart or just acknowledge reading any post .
We also should better highlight the most interesting and informative topics - having some catchy headlines to entice further exploration
It's the reasoning for CNX leaving that is dumb... They say there is no money available for development because of the anit-dilution (chinese) crowd. Yet CNX hasn't even put forth a proposal for anything (MAS, Bonds, Rate Limited Transactions).
What is even dumber is how BM has basically screwed everyone who has ever followed his vision by making them jump from investment to investment. Buy PTS, Donate AGS, Buy BTSX, Buy BTS, Buy Brownies, Buy Steem. That's 6 different investments just to try to keep up with Dan's latest squeeze. Then you have Stan spouting off in the cryptofresh video about how people are going to wish they bought bts back when it was under a cent, all while preparing to fork bts and create steem with no bts sharedrop. BM is like one of those TV preachers that keep asking for more and more money while guaranteeing they will take you to the promise land if you give.
In all honesty though, BTS being out of CNX's control and focus is probably a good thing. After all the promises and announcements that did nothing to increase the market cap of BTS, having a new group of leaders might be what BTS needs.
Can anyone verify that they are getting the same view count I am getting for the New Money explainer vid? Its at 4300
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjqUQtuLUAk
If this is correct it seems that we have gotten 2000+ views in the last 48 hours
Might be going viral right now. We plan to turn that YouTube channel into a Crypto/Mainstream powerhouse channel. So this is a good start.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but some whales leaving ship just give more leadership to the remaining supporters. Right?
At that point, I think BM withdraw on a facebook/reddit (Please name me a reddit clone that doesnt feel like russian thundra right now) is all what was really needed for BTS to focus and move on with a more 'enlighten' alignement with workers/voters.
Leadership was lazy and now it's time for change. Statu quo sucks. Both for investment and development.
There is no such thing as not "going where I was hoping."
I'm seeking ideas, concepts, and strategies that might interest whales who are looking for a winning way to become a player. Some seem to realize that developing their own private blockchain (their first instinct) has its own acceptance issues. Building on an established (real time, industrial grade) public chain with a decentralized governance mechanism may mitigate some of those issues. Using a small billion dollar revenue stream to promote a public chain rather than perhaps committing trillions to back a suspiciously private chain is an option I think has potential. I'm just looking for our community's best brains to figure out the gory details.
Every unicorn I have talked to so far has liked the idea, so I think we're on to something.
比特股寻精之旅!
bitshares searching for sperm of journey!
great!
good idea!
i like this!
just do it!
Just loved the idea of a beneve-whale...... and dragons, I love the idea of dragons.
Surprised nobody commented about the value these vested funds represent as I did. What good does delaying the vesting? The major point of vesting is to retain talent, and that aspect is mostly gone as empirical said. Same with deleting them. Sure that counters inflation, but how significant is that in the bigger picture? That primarily makes sense to the anti-dilution crowd, who offer zero input on how to pay for sustaining this ecosystem let alone improving it. They seem to loose sight of the fact their holding will become worthless if the ecosystem dies or cannot be maintained. Maybe the illusion of protecting their holdings is blinding them to the slow death that zero tolerance dilution will bring.
i think the question is not clear.
if you intent to free my vesting BTS we could do it, if you want to delete it i am against it. I hope this poll is about the first one.
I looked at the answer. I always think there is some hack/cheat. I wonder how long it would have taken me to get it.. lol.
Ha ha! Now you'll never know how long it would've taken you. Do you think it's a good puzzle?
I agree with Julian. How exactly do we go through this whole merger fiasco and yet still end up losing BM to a competing chain? It's completely ridiculous. Reminds me of when the promise was to focus all efforts on BTS, but then BM goes and tries sharedropping Devshares to AGS/PTS. Then came the brownies. Now obviously Steem.
How hard is it to focus on just one damn project?
But be that as it may it seems pretty obvious that ending merger vesting early would cause more harm than good. Oh well.
Those balances *are* the property of their owners.
That property interest was the equivalent of a royal grant made by the (former) developers of Bitshares who held merge rights on the Bitshares Github repository. The legitimacy of that act has always been in doubt, because it was never subject to stakeholder vote.
The quid-pro-quo for this gift was the alignment of the developer resources and chains (vote, dns, bitshares). Additionally there was an insight that having multiple dapps on the same chain has synergy and efficiency benefits compared with multiple dapps on different chains. (See BMs discussion on the cost of cross-chain transactions, or consult the Ethereum market cap for reference).
The Bitshares Royalty have now abdicated their position in favor of a new interest (Steem). It is natural to consider if Bitshares can afford to pay 700k/day with no benefit attached, and when the original terms of the arrangement no longer carry any meaning.