I actually tend to agree here...and by far my largest holdings are in BTS.
Not providing significant incentive for 3rd parties to sharedrop on tokens like PTS/AGS make for a lack of decentralization in power. Not only that, it also creates a lack of decentralization in one's portfolio.
Now I am alllll in on DPOS because I feel it is by far the best protocol in crypto, but I would certainly like to see (someday) direct competitors to BTS. How crazy is that?? I consider myself one of the most staunch of BTS fanboys!
The cure-all surely is to note that there is a difference between what BitShares does and what third parties might/could/?should do.
Given what bytemaster has suggested about the background, perhaps [10% AGS; 10% PTS; and 80% BTS] is a simple best option for DVS.. though equally given DVS' role relative to BTS, 100% BTS clearly makes sense too.
It seems there are enough people arguing for PTS and certainly some, including perhaps the Chinese, who are keen AGS is still acknowledged; so, perhaps third parties in future can consider those and no-one should really expect 100% BTS would ever occur from third parties and perhaps some measure of the distance they are from centre BitShares will be reflected in the push to PTS/AGS.
I have been thinking about it some more and here is where I am leaning pending review:
100% BTS with the 2 year vesting period converted into a 2 month vesting period and removing the 1% allocated to VOTE.
My reasoning is that with a 100% share drop on BTS that AGS and PTS both get their 10% using the 11/5 snapshot AND it is inline with my prior statements that honoring a chain that honors a chain is good.
This way we are not "reallocating" anyones money and efforts to support the development chain are not seen as reallocating ownership.
The dev chain will have very high dilution (10x BTS... 60% the first year... ) assuming current BTS owners vote to support delegates that take 100%.
After a review I will write a blog post explaining the change and reason.
Because this was a "retro-active" snapshot and DEV is not listed anywhere and has no GUI few should be harmed by changing this.