How can you say that prioritizing by collateral won't increase the collateral? Of course it does and this means that bitUSD will have more collateral securing it which should give bitUSD holders greater confidence.
Sorry, for deleting the rest of your inconsistent statements (if you disagree we can argue on them separately).
Easily so, highly collateralized short lived position
do not increase the overall collateralization... by much...
but this is just a tiny bit of my problems with the whole system...
BTW, this is the last time I am proving to you why your system does
not work. From now on expect, you to prove why it
does!
Nothing personal, I am generally not in the business of proving negative facts! Do you want me to ask the same question I asked the NuBits guy?