61
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 自平台测试链发布了
« on: March 21, 2016, 04:17:04 am »
全力支持 增发0刀,零增发500刀妥妥的
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
To sustain BTS's marketcap , investors are always more important than users . Especially "speculators" . So-called Long term investors only provide liquidity once .
So basically you think that BTS is just another pump'n'dump coin and not a share of a DAC?
BTS is shares . Shares are pump and dumps according to basic and simple economical common sense .
Every shares in the world is about predicting its potential/future and speculative on it short term/long term beyond or below their actual value.
BTS has no product . Even the basic product is built on top of shares . Hence another speculative design .
If I have the time , I could write a thesis to explain it . Sadly I don't .
In order to have a profitable business with actual economical income , you need outside income . But BTS by design can only accept inside shares as income . It's the exact meaning of "inner-circulation" . People can only pay the system by the speculative value of BTS , not by real outside money like fiat/btc . And BTS holders can not get dividend from actual outside value .
Hmm....I think I may lost you here .
If I build a machine that provides a service that people find useful,
and people pay "real" money to buy tickets to use that machine,
then that machine is a valid business.
The fact that people speculate on the future value of those tickets is a completely orthogonal proposition.
Second, and most importantly his vote does not preclude workers being voted in does it? I believe he will stop voting no to ALL worker then and there when it does . Until then it is just a way to show his believe in conservative spending.
You on the other hand make a big deal out of it, like it has prevented any development already! Take it for what it is - making a point and pointing that we (collectively as BTS holders) are generally on the side of useless spending... spending for the sake of spending more often than not.
I'm not. I'm just asking, what do anti dilution people expect. It's a simple question. That's all I want to know. I'm not defending worker proposals just because. If they aren't needed I don't support them, that's it. I also think we should be conservative, but come up with something worthy and take action.