持票人当然可以撤理事的票。
投票制度一致在运行,然而就是有那么几个人,整天就知道又叫又咬,仿佛只有他们才是持票人似的。
随便吧.
You lost ten of millions of BTS from OMO fund and Spring fund and later lost it again because of your stupid BSIP42 making big part of community leave to uphold hard pegg at all costs because of what ?To get businesses ?
Now you destroyed all confidence in bitassets because of your inside deals corruption in committee and stupid idea again.
You claim to support legal and open a company in thailand (biggest stupidity i ever heard) so businesses will join bitshares.
You really think any business is going to join bitshares seeing the corruption you created in committee giving you power over their assets ?
You must be a fool thinking any business would be going to invest into an asset which is controlled by you 4 corrupt committee members.
You made the majority of community leave thinking your scammy behavior will never end.
Your gateway lost majority of it traders making a laughable 100-200k bts trading volume.
How much more are you going to destroy bitshares ?
Maybe till chinese see we will get kicked out sooner or later of a major exchange because of breaking US and EU regulations about security tokens which you guys keep ignoring.
You did nothing positive for bitshares in the past 18 months.All you do is based on greed and control freak destroying everything bitshares represented.
Where are your supporters left that they don't trade on GDEX anymore ?
You need to pay them so they will use GDEX or bitassets because you created something noone is willing to use otherwise anymore?
Does community from biki,xt or mcx which should grow bitshares based on your claim for which we paid a lot of money don't bring any volume and growth ?
Let me ask you something when people left bitassets (bitshares) because of depegg ,corruption in committee making bitassets high risk and broken governance,
what would be the first step to get them back ?
A dividend ?
MM contest ?
Btw did any of you chinese people visited bitshares telegram groups looking how they are doing ?
ALL of them are inactive nearly dead.
Bitshares had so many active groups which are all on silent mode now because noone is willing to participate activly in your garbage anymore.
That is the result of your great work and longterm ignorancy.
The only message you can read on chats and even on github also from many chinese people is "I don't care anymore"
What is the base principle of public blockchain? in my view it should be "code is law".
and in Bitshares scenario, the code lead to below rules:
1.Voters decide which witness node be active, which account be the committee member, which worker proposal be approved.
2.witnesses determine the block generation.
3.committee member technically manage businesses including fee schedule, bitAssets parameters and committee managed funds businesses. and is open to businesses like community organization, roadmap formulating etc.
If Voters find that any witness/committee member/worker proposal is evil/unacceptable, he/she can and can lobby others to withdraw the voting at any time.
For example, technically the 6 committee members from China can divide/share the 5M+ BTS in committee-account to their own pockets, but I believe more than 99% of the BTS holders agree this is evil and it will not happen.
But the world is complex, it is not always so easy for community to reach consensus on whether one business is excellent or stupid or doing evil.
at this time we can only depend on voting.
take also BAIP6 as example, the current voting figure is as below:
1.14.260 Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model 485,752,952
1.14.236 BAIP-Threshold 480,208,993
1.14.261 Poll-BAIP6-Do Not Implement BTS-DEX economic model 140,096,151
The FOR proposal is above BAIP Threshold and get much more voting power than the AGAINST proposal, why shouldn't we do it?
Someone said this proposal need to be treated as worker proposal, why? why we need worker proposal when there is no necessity to automatically draw funds from the reserve pool?
If this proposal is doing evil or unacceptable, why only 140M voting power is against it?
If committee get enough support to make this things done? why we need to make things more difficult?
Bitshares is special partly because the founding team left and the community participate the governance at very early stage, regarding myself, in my view I have done something good but also something wrong/stupid, no need to talk more detail on this this time.
I understand that currently there's big gap between China and Western community, I think any committee member who value this role will pay more attention to where more voting power come from, definitely I hope Bitshares will always be globally welcome, and I am open to any topic, however I have no time or patience to reply on the insulting words.
If anyone think I am not a qualified committee member, please withdraw and lobby others to withdraw the voting on me, US people need to wait till Nov to withdraw Donald Trump but you can withdraw me at any time.
I know that we have several topics that need serious discussion, like legal issues, hope there will be good atmosphere for discussing that.