Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - llildur

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
17
General Discussion / Re: Semi-centralized smart contracts on Bitshares
« on: March 12, 2017, 11:43:14 pm »
It's some sort of automated checkpoint only, not centralized, like LN channels

18
Done  :)

19
General Discussion / Re: Why Bitshares?
« on: January 22, 2017, 07:31:08 am »
Why Bitshares?
Because is backed for a resilient comunity who already deliver one of the best products in the field and is working towards new exciting ideas.

Why does it matter?
It matter because when time comes people gonna need alternatives, BTS is a platform that can be used for individuals as well as business and corporations to manage their finances with complete transparency, the roboustness of the tech makes it ideal for any pourpose, and is a cheap solution to complex problems

Why does it matter to me?
IMO BTS is a hiden treasure, the vast majority of people are distracted in new ventures who promises many things that BTS already delivered, the problem here from my point of view is timing, the people aren't ready yet and the crypto space is still in early stages, only a little spark can release all the potencial hidden in this project and BTS is posed to be a prominent player.

20
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] BitGate Pre-Crowdfund ICO
« on: January 19, 2017, 07:54:48 am »
Why not post here 8 days ago ? i just missed the bonus scheme  :(

21
Technical Support / Re: vesting claim
« on: December 07, 2016, 03:43:16 am »
Since nobody will answer this poor gentlemen, I'll try:  The fee you paid to withdraw from vesting is greater than the amount of vested withdrawn , that's why your BTS balance decreased.

See that Vesting balance withdraw is 294 BTS from https://cryptofresh.com/fees.

You can also see the raw transaction here:
https://cryptofresh.com/tx/9ce8c48679d584f856e76d5fabe73a5fd96f693f

You paid 293.52695 BTS to withdraw 42.01065 BTS.

 +5%

22
General Discussion / Re: Another cryptonomex spin off?
« on: November 05, 2016, 07:00:14 pm »
"All in all its just another brick in the wall."

We are in the business of building up everything needed to decentralize The System.
We will reveal the new pieces as their loose ends are tied off, one by one.
The next piece of the puzzle will be revealed this month, as I stated in the referenced post.
It will benefit the whole industry in general and the BitShares ecosystem in particular.

 ??? Mysterious is not healthy for me  :-[

23
General Discussion / Re: BitShares administrative and maintenance tasks
« on: November 01, 2016, 05:27:19 am »
This sounds like a great idea to me.

However, not being technically minded, I have proxied my vote to Xeroc. If you get his vote, you automatically have mine!

Same here and welcome back  :)

24
goodbye revenue share for the next MONTHS :D
  :'( :P i was thinking the same,  hoping a fast recovery.

25
Random Discussion / Re: fuck you, fav, don't edit my post
« on: September 17, 2016, 07:16:03 am »
 :P :P :D

26
“Only FUNC tokens held in the Fun-Casino wallet itself are eligible for weekly dividends. ”

how to send FUNC to the Fun-Casino wallet?

Hi you must send your Func tokens to fun-casino account in OL whit your registered email attached in a memo section, the e-mail is the same you registered in Fun Casino page.

27
General Discussion / Re: BTS tranfer to poloniexwallet went wrong
« on: September 16, 2016, 10:45:47 pm »
It is good idea ban this type of accounts but the sad part is that it cost to you some money  :(

28
I think buy back and burn is still the best option, sharedroping will share the unsold obits too.

29
Openledger / Re: Open.xxx assets withdrawal not working
« on: September 15, 2016, 07:35:54 am »
Same to me NP at all

30
First of all thanks for don't answer my last question  ::) today i recieved the blockpay pre-ico tokens only 78.21 but i send to the ico.blockpay account 60 OPEN.POS and 0.1 BTC in the first tier of pre.ico, the numbers don't match  >:(  here are the TX of transactions Tx c6c6329bf63ceaa059ccbe1799b852bf2d69a50c@8996473 and Tx 893eb12b78a935ba7c53af3100c37dd3d68633cb@8996594 can someone clarify this to me or provide some support thanks.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4