You know what? Until BTS holders start providing liquidity this will continue to go down.
And BTS holders SHOULD otherwise their stake is going buh-bye anyways.
Good luck everybody.
Which comes first.. the utility or the liquidity? I think the problem with the liquidity is largely due to the lack of utility.. and this is largely due to the issues related to 1.0 in terms of usability. That pretty much puts the current situation in a freeze pattern.
I think as we see more utility you will start to see the liquidity coming up to match and in a competitive way. Utility proposition for BitShares in 2.0 is hand over first superior. If all features fire on all cylinders it will take off like a formula one. If we have a few not firing.. we still flash forward unlike anything seen in the past.
I will also take this opportunity to note that we offered the community a way to increase our liquidity tremendously with BunkerMining by voting in our delegates.. we didn't get the votes to get it done.. we got one delegate voted in which only serves to drag the project out for many months until there is enough for the work to be done. Vote
http://vote.bunkermining.com if you still like to see our liquidity increase. We would like nothing more than to be pushing $50,000 bitUSD in payouts a day to miners vs. the few hundred a day at best we continue to operate at without being able to deliver consistent competitive performance. If we had been voted in way back when we first proposed we would be in a very different place today I assure you.