还有用BTC模式来类比说明吧,很多名人都赞美BTC是一个好的支付系统,很重要的一个原因就是BTC是一个低成本的支付系统,也就说BTC的交易费用很低,在网络空闲的时候是0交易费用,在网络繁忙的时候是0.0001BTC 也相当于2毛的的交易费用。但实际上BTC的交易费用真这么低吗,我来分析一下,现在每个块支付给BTC的矿工的维护费用是25BTC,当然还加上少量的交易手续费直接从交易上收取的。那么就相当于每块至少支付了25BTC的成本费给矿工,而现在BTC的每块的交易数大约是500笔左右。所以每笔的交易的成本费=25*2000/500=100元左右,的确花费了这么多的成本给了矿工,但为什么BTC的交易费还这么便宜呢,BTC支付成本的方式是通过增发BTC来实现的,而不是从交易者者中收取的。这样的低成本才让BTC获得了非常多的关注。
那么如果我们改了一下BTC的规则,让25BTC的费用全部从交易费中出,那是一个怎么样的结果,结果是每笔交易的交易费在100人民币,那不是比中国的银行还黑吗,如果真这样,我想BTC也不会吸引这么多人去关注。
同样对于BTS也是一样,BTS要想有价值,必须要吸引足够多的人使用bitusd/bitcny。越多人用bitusd/bitcny那么多BTS的价格就越高。什么能吸引人们用Bitusd呢,除了无区域限制,价值稳定外,还有一个很重要的原因是支付费用便宜,甚至零成本。实际上终端用户可能甚至不知道BTS是什么,他们更关注使用BITUSD支付是不是费用更低。和BTC同样的道理,用温和的通胀去支付代表费用和开发费用。收很少或者0交易费用。BTS是股份,实际上问题就变成了,选择是否同意股份被稀释一部分可以换来更多人使用bitusd让BTS的总市值大增加。我宁愿选择股份被稀释一点。总价值大大增加。
相反,如果收取比较高的手续费去支付代表和开发费用,BTS股份没有被稀释,但系统对终端用户的吸引力下降了。
建议应该有一个总量上限,不能被每年稀释,这个问题在英文社区也提了好多次,大家也可以去顶我的帖子
I think people hate to invest something uncertainty. it is so difficult to introduce BTS without max supply limited to new investor . though fact is the real dilution is lower to 3% per year. the max is
~8% per year. so no one know the max supply of bts. I don`t know why not set a top ceiling.
how about this model
the max supply of BTS is 3.9 billion , max pay rate is 50 BTS per block to delegate till the supply of BTX is up to 3.2 billion , max pay rate reduce to 25 bts per block if supply of bts between 3.2 billion to 3.55 billion,so:
supply of bts max pay per block how many year it will take if 100% pay how many year it will take if 25% pay
2.5 billion to 3.2 billion 50 ~4.5 years ~18 years
3.2 billion to 3.55 billion 25 ~4.5 years ~18 years
3.55 billion to 3.725 billion 12.5 ~4.5 years ~18 years
3.725 billion to 3.8125 billion 6.25 ~4.5 years ~18 years=
+++ 6.25/2
...............................
so the max supply of bts is limited to 3.9 billion
compare with BTC , max supply is 21M, and current supply is 13.4M, the totally dilution =21/13.45-1=56% ,the max supply of bts is 3.9 B, and current supply is 2.5 B , the totally dilution=3.9/2.5-1=56% , some dilution .
the figure show if the pay rate is 25% , situation of 50 bts per block can keep 18 years.
so there are much space to reduce the max dilution , if set the max supply of BTS is 3.2 billion ,the totally dilution =3.2/2.5-1=28% , it is half than BTC
if we set the max supply of BTS is 3.2 billion
then dilution model as follow:
supply of bts max pay per block how many year it will take if 100% pay how many year it will take if 25% pay
2.5 billion to 2.85 billion 50 ~2.2 years ~8.8 years
2.85 billion to 3.025 billion 25 ~2.2 years ~8.8 years
3.025 billion to 3.1125 billion 12.5 ~2.2 years ~8.8 years
3.1125 billion to 3.15625 billion 6.25 ~2.2 years ~8.8 years
the total dilution only is half of BTC. but also have enough BTS to attract and encourage join us