Guest
Login
Register
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Menu
Home
Help
Login
Register
BitShares Forum
/
Main
/
General Discussion
/
What are a few direct and indirect costs of the “block size debate”?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: What are a few direct and indirect costs of the “block size debate”? (Read 842 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
November 02, 2015, 11:11:01 am
Reply
#2
monsterer
Hero Member
Posts: 1872
BitShares:
monsterer
GitHub:
wildbunny/metaexchange
Re: What are a few direct and indirect costs of the “block size debate”?
The blockchain is the consensus for changes - miners vote by choosing a fork to mine on
Logged
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
https://metaexchange.info
| Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads
October 31, 2015, 12:39:40 pm
Reply
#1
Samupaha
Sr. Member
Posts: 479
BitShares:
samupaha
What are a few direct and indirect costs of the “block size debate”?
Tim Swanson has written
a good blogpost
.
Bitcoin doesn't have a consensus mechanism for blockchain parameters so it's users and developers have to spend a lot of money and time to fight what should be done.
This is one reason why I think Bitshares is superior to Bitcoin.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
BitShares Forum
/
Main
/
General Discussion
/
What are a few direct and indirect costs of the “block size debate”?