Is there a judgement that establishes the principle that a transaction is bound to the jurisdiction where it is *first* included in a block?
I always wondered about that argument - also, in an actual case, I supposed the witness will have to provide evidence that the machine that produced a block was in deed located
in that particular country, right?
Last but not least, I also think that the block producers should be able to whitelist/blacklist contracts that they want to (are allowed) to execute. Just imagine a block producer supporting
the sale of securities or a smart contract for assassination, drugs, or other weird stuff. If I was running a block producer on a jurisdictional agile blockchain, I would expect to have means
to protect my block producer against liabilities that come from a smart contract, right? Are there any plans to add that feature?