Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - onceuponatime

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
16
Technical Support / BitShares2-light won't connect
« on: January 01, 2016, 11:29:57 pm »
Suddenly today my light wallet stopped connecting.

I get this message:

Application initialization issues

API Connection
wss://bitshares.openledger.info/ws   [ + ]
Connection Status   NOT CONNECTED
[ RETRY ]


Retry doesn't work, nor does closing and reopening the wallet.
Any ideas?

17
Freebie / What is this PM about?
« on: December 29, 2015, 03:04:08 am »
I received the following PM today:


"At 12/28/2015 11:44:31 PM UTC a security code was requested for your account: xxxXxxxX"


What does this mean and what, if any, action should I take?

18
Thanks to luckybit's suggestion here:
 
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/452
"It might be a better idea from a marketing perspective to rename it to "invisible transactions" and call it "invisible mode" or "incognito" mode. Stealth transfers is something which some people might think is quirky. It also has a more militant sound to it."
,

I propose changing the name of a Stealth Feature to "Privacy Mode".

I propose that I fund the development and implementation of this feature in full as a private investor and at zero cost to BitShares holders.


************************************************************************************************************************

There has already been preliminary discussion of this by the Community in two threads:

Fee Backed Assets (FBA)
« on: November 27, 2015, 01:44:04 AM »

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20286.0.html

and

Stealth Transfers Worker Proposal
« on: November 19, 2015, 12:48:16 AM »

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20104.0.html

Much consultation with Stan of Cryptonomex and with several prominent and trusted members of our BitShares Community (rgcrypto, Thom, Riverhead, Xeroc) has lead me to some preliminary conclusions as to how a "Privacy Mode"  feature could best be implemented and  used in a safe and timely fashion and at no risk to the BitShares Community.

One of the first and thorniest problems we tackled is the nasty fact of "Regulatory Risk". There exists a vocal contingent of Forum members who want very much that an FBA (fee based asset) be created to fund this feature upgrade to the BitShares blockchain. They want that everyone be thus enabled an opportunity to participate in the fee stream originating from future use of the feature by purchasing shares of a "STEALTH" asset.

The conundrum is that whoever creates the FBA and offers it to the public as a means of participation in a fee-based income stream faces a risk of coming under regulatory scrutiny if the project is a success (Satoshi Dice) or even if it is not a success (through some disgruntled investor complaining to a regulatory authority).

For a more in depth look in to Regulatory Risk please see:  http://www.cuttingedgecapital.com/what-is-a-security-and-why-does-it-matter/

"What is a security and why does it matter?

If something falls within the definition of a security under applicable law, it will be governed by extensive rules and regulations that can be quite complex and expensive to comply with."


And subject the issuer to a large fine/other penalties if not complied with!!!!

As CoinHoarder has said in this thread:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20431.msg263638.html#msg263638
"I can think of a ton of things that fit one or a few categories but not all, so I will only list things that I think mostly apply to all categories:

Cryptocurrency IPOs
Unregistered securities (operating one or offering an exchange service)
Unregistered money service businesses
Gambling"


***************************************************************************************************************************

Once a "Privacy Mode" feature has been implemented on the blockchain, but not before, it would then be possible for future investor entrepreneurs to create FBAs and crowd fund new features by having a Private Mode account issue the FBA from an unknown jurisdiction that is presumably not subject to securities concerns. Several exist in this world of ours  ;D.

As a matter of fact, once the "Private Mode" feature has been implemented on the blockchain and is proven to work........

and once there is a visible and growing fee-based income stream coming from use of the feature...........

I have been informed that there are investors who would be interested in purchasing that fee stream from me and they might then create an FBA and offer shares for sale on the DEX as a way for the Community to participate in that fee stream.

These investors are private and unknown to either me or Cryptonomex. I would simply be selling them the keys to the income stream and then she/they can create an FBA if they so wish. It is beyond the control of myself or Cryptonomex. But they have indicated that this is what they intend.

*************************************************************************************************************************

Here follows a potential contract between myself (onceuponatime) and Cryptonomex:



Stealth "Privacy Mode" feature and Fee Based Assets
Cryptonomex Statement of Work


The purpose of this contract is to develop a Privacy Mode feature, Privacy Mode fee accumulation account, Maintenance Account, Initialization Package, and GUI interface for BitShares scoped for a firm fixed price of $45K.  The following requirements apply:

1.   The Privacy Mode feature shall be implemented as proposed in https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/452 (as amended).

2.   It shall provide the following fee based services:
       o   Transfer from public account to their own private balance
       o   Transfer from one of their private accounts to one of their private contacts
       o    Transfer from one of their private accounts to any public account
       o    Register a new account using a private balance.
       o     Receive a private transfer from a 3rd party given a transfer receipt.

3.   Each of these services shall charge a fee initially set at 3x the standard transfer fee, but which may be adjusted from time to time by the owner(s) of the Privacy Mode fees account

4.   Fees shall be automatically distributed by the blockchain to the following accounts:
        o   20% to the BitShares network.
        o   20% to a Maintenance Account.
        o   60% to holder(s) of the Privacy Mode Fees accumulation account

5.   The Maintenance Account shall be controlled by five specified manager accounts in  a 3 of 5 multisig configuration.  These managers will control the allocation of this fund to future maintenance and upgrade tasks.

6.   The Initialization Package shall modify the blockchain to make the Privacy Mode feature available to users.

7.     The Initialization Package shall make provision for the creation of generic Fee Based Assets (FBA) and set the fee for such

8.   A GUI shall be provided in the OpenLedger and Light wallets to allow ordinary users to easily use the Privacy Mode features.

9.     Documentation of the Privacy Mode feature and Maintenance and Fee Accumulation account shall be provided on the appropriate reference web sites.

10.   Resulting software patch to the Graphene library shall have the same license as the rest of Graphene subject to the condition that the results of the Initialization package and fee distribution mechanisms are not modified.


*******************************************************************************************************************

Road Map:


- Feedback and discussion of this thread: December 8 to December 10, 2015

- Presentation of an amended Cryptonomex Worker Proposal: Dec 11, 2015
   This worker proposal should include Milestones of what is intended to be
     accomplished by the end of week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 and week 5 so that the
     Community can follow progress in the github.

- Voting for Worker Proposal: Dec 11 to January 1, 2016

- onceuponatime forwards $45,000 to Cryptonomex: Jan.2, 2016

_ Cryptonomex does the development and testing of the feature: (4 to 6 weeks)

- Hard fork for implementation of the feature:  Monday Feb, 15th (Louis Riel Day)

************************************************************************************************************************

What can YOU (BitShares holders) do?

-    over the next two days please discuss any insight you may have as to potential weaknesses or missed opportunities in the plan as outlined. Post your comments in this thread.

-    when the Worker Proposal comes out in a couple of days, PLEASE VOTE!!
      My offer to fund the development of a Privacy Mode feature is contingent upon the
       Worker Proposal having been voted in by January 1st, 2016 (preferably much sooner!).


19
Random Discussion / The new Blackberry Priv is awesome
« on: November 30, 2015, 11:25:00 pm »
Here's one reason I chose the Blackberry Priv:

BlackBerry to exit Pakistan over demand for access to its servers

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/blackberry-pakistan-1.3343660

20
Random Discussion / Peak Obedience
« on: September 02, 2015, 08:02:32 pm »
Peak Obedience
FREEMANSPERSPECTIVE · Sep 1st, 2015

http://www.freemansperspective.com/peak-obedience/

Warnings about Peak Oil have circulated widely in recent years, and if accurate, they are important. Peak oil, however, pales in comparison to something that’s happening right in front of us… and something that is a good deal more dangerous: Peak Obedience.

If that concept strikes you as odd, I can understand why: We’ve all been living inside of an obedience cult. (And I choose these words carefully.)

In our typical “scary cult” stories, we find people who have given up their own functions of choice and who then do crazy things because they are told to by some authority. While inside their cult, however, it all makes sense; it’s all self-reinforcing.

So, inside a cult of obedience, obedience would seem proper; it would seem righteous; and more than anything else, it would seem normal. And I think that very well describes the Western status quo.

Obedience, however, should not seem normal to us. Obedience holds our minds in a “child” state, and that is not fitting for any healthy person past their first few years of life. It also presupposes that the people we obey have complete and final knowledge; and in fact, they do not: politicians, central bankers, and the other lords of the age have been wrong – obviously and publicly wrong – over and over.

So, obedience is not a logical position to take. But we all know why we take it; and that reason is fear. The mass of humanity obeys because they are afraid to do otherwise. All the “philosophy of governance” explanations are merely attempts to distract us from the truth: people believe they’ll be hurt if they don’t obey.

We are taught not to think in such stark terms, of course. Those “philosophy of governance” explanations give us reasons to believe that obedience is the good and heroic thing to do. Still, we know the truth.

But that truth about fear, even though important, is not the point I’d like you to take away from this article. My primary point is this:

When we obey, we make ourselves less conscious; we make ourselves less alive.
Why Obedience Is Peaking

I covered this in far more depth in issue #40 of my subscription letter, but I would like to provide a brief explanation here.

Over the past two centuries, authority has benefitted from a perfect storm of influences. There was never such a time previously, and there probably will never be another. Briefly, here’s what happened:

Morality was broken

For better or worse, Western civilization had a consistent set of moral standards from about the 10th century through the 17th or 18th century. Then, through the 20th century, those standards were broken.

Note that I did not say morality was changed. The cultural morality of the West was not replaced, but broken. The West has endured a moral void ever since.

Previously, people routinely compared authority’s decrees to a separate standard (most often the Bible), to see if they held up. But with Western morals broken, authority was freed from restraint.

Economies of scale

Factories made it much cheaper to produce large numbers of goods than the old way, in individual workshops. Economists call this an economy of scale. Thus a cult of size began, making “obedience to the large” seem normal.

Fiat currency

Fiat currency has allowed governments to spend money without consequences. It allowed politicians to wage war and to provide free food, free education, and free medicine… all without overtly raising taxes. Fiat currency made it seem that politics was magical.

Mass conditioning

Built on the factory model, massive government institutions undertook the education of the populace. And more important than their overt curriculum (math, reading, etc.) was their invisible curriculum: obedience to authority. Here, to illustrate, is a quote from the esteemed Bertrand Russell, who is himself quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the founding father of public schooling:

Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished.

Mass media

Mass media turbocharged authority and obedience in the 20th century. It was authority’s dream technology.

All of these things, and others, created an unnatural peak for authority. But now, this perfect storm is receding.
Peak Obedience Is Brittle

Through the 20th century, the people of the West built up a very high compliance inertia. They complied with the demands of authority and taught their children to do the same, until it became automatic. People obeyed simply because they had obeyed in the past.

Authority quickly became addicted to this situation, basing their plans on receiving every benefit of the doubt.

Automatic obedience, however, is a brittle thing. Economies of scale are failing, the money cartel has been exposed, government schools have lost respect, mass media is fading away, and the game continues because the populace is distracted and afraid. And that will not last forever.

The ‘walls’ of reflexive compliance are growing thinner. Any serious break may ruin the structure.
And Then?

It has long been understood that complex systems breed more complexity, and eventually break themselves. As central authorities try to solve each problem they face, they inevitably create others. Eventually the system becomes so complex, and its costs so much, that new challenges cannot be solved. Then the system and its authority fail, as they did recently in the Soviet Union.

Sooner or later, this is going to happen here. (If that seems impossible to you, please reflect on the current state of the mighty Roman Empire.) But again, that’s not my primary point. Obedience matters to you right now: today and every other day.

Obedience turns the best parts of you off. It degrades and kills your creativity; it undercuts your effectiveness and especially your sense of satisfaction.

Don’t sign away your life, no matter how many others do. Live consciously.

Paul Rosenberg

21
Technical Support / Wallet won't opern
« on: July 28, 2015, 06:05:39 pm »
I have been running the BTS 0.9.1 for several weeks without a problem. Yesterday my laptop shut down unexpectedly.

 When I restarted the computer the BitShares wallet wouldn't launch. I would enter my password and click on "unlock" and the screen would flash the waiting dots for a second, and then stop. Press "unlock" again, same thing.

So I uninstalled 0.9.1 and installed 0.9.2

Now when I enter my password and click on "unlock" the waiting screen with flasing dots stays on for a long time, then goes off. The task manager shows me that my memory usage keeps going up rapidly while the dots are showing, then memory usage increase slows right down when they disappear. Clicking on "unlock" again brings the dots back and memory usage keeps increasing.

I then tried deleting all the folders in my "appdata" "roaming"  "bitshares" except for wallets. Then I uninstalled and reinstalled 0.9.2

Same results. Can't open the wallet.  Repeated the previous steps, but same result.

I am using a laptop with Windows 7  with 16GB RAM  and 64-bit operating system and a solid state hard drive.

I have never had problems loading BitShares new releases on this computer before now.

Any suggestions?

22
General Discussion / A garage full of mousetraps
« on: July 18, 2015, 09:27:29 pm »
Marketing genius Mac Ross says, "If you build a better mousetrap but don't put aside money for marketing, you will die alone and broke with a garage full of mousetraps."

23
DAC PLAY / Trouble synchronizing
« on: July 10, 2015, 06:19:52 pm »
Although I have 17 network connection, my wallet will not sync.

Do I need to add nodes? If so, what ones?

I have tried closing and then restarting several times. Doesn't help.

24
DAC PLAY / vesting funds?
« on: July 08, 2015, 09:04:00 pm »
Has anyone been able to collect any of their vesting funds? If so, what is the trick? I keep getting an error message "20010 insufficient funds:  insufficient funds" even though I do have funds in my wallet, and I thought the vesting period began on July 1st.

25
Random Discussion / Paper Castles and 21st Century Feudalism
« on: July 01, 2015, 09:03:13 pm »
This is an excellent discussion:

Paper Castles and 21st Century Feudalism | McAlvany Weekly Commentary 2015


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFh8l5Xp2aM

26
General Discussion / BTC Guild is Closing Down
« on: June 16, 2015, 03:58:16 am »
BTC Guild is Closing Down
BTC Guild will be shutting down its mining servers on June 30th, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. Users will still be able to log in and retrieve their history (CSV exports on the settings page) and request withdrawals until September 30, 2015..

Why is BTC Guild Shutting Down?
https://www.btcguild.com/


"Finally, I have been growing concerned for some time now about attempts to defraud pools. The pool's luck has been on a decline for over a year. The luck on a few other pools has also shown a negative trend. While it is not impossible that it's a coincidence, this is something I have been constantly made aware of and am helpless against. There is no way to know whether it's just bad luck, a small bug in older miners (BTC Guild probably has the highest percentage of first/second generation ASICs) resulting in a few % of block-solving shares to disappear, or a large pool trying to hurt the competition (many of the largest pools have large private mining operations now). It would only take a fraction (1 PH/s or less could do it) to cause significant harm to a competing pool, and that activity could be masked by proxies and multiple accounts to be impossible to catch".

27
Random Discussion / Knowledge is Power
« on: June 11, 2015, 04:57:12 pm »
This is the most important talk I have ever heard for comprehending fraud within the global financial system(s). Caveat emptor!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0mimIp8mr8

28
Technical Support / Unable to vote today
« on: May 25, 2015, 07:20:13 pm »
Today, for the first time ever, I am unable to vote for delegates. I get this error message:  "invalid asset amount (35005)" when I try.

I am doing nothing differently today than the many time that I have successfully voted before today.

Any suggestions?

29
General Discussion / Mine for Gold
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:34:58 pm »
Did this mining for gold concept get ripped off from Mine Baitshares, or did they come up with it independently?

Mine the New Bitcoin (ILCoin) and Get Paid in Gold :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=19&v=nXyPLttdXZE

30
A very informative report for potential startups:


Raise Capital Using Securities:
Does Crowdfunding Ease the Way?


https://solari.com/articles/does_crowdfunding_ease_the_way/

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5