But who is to blame that people are allowed in december to invoice for april and take a larger amount of BTS from the reserve pool as they would when invoicing in a timely manner?
Fox added now invoices for July where bitshares was on peak this year.
Instead we pay when BTS is on this years ATL making that we need to pay 3.5 times more BTS as if he would have added the invoices in a timely manner.
But instead many months old invoices are now being added into the weakest performing month for BTS.
The current worker model and proposal text do not contain a strict deadline for that. I'm quite sure that any future proposals will contain a strict timeframe for invoicing.
The core team report is now blaming that there were not enough funds to work on full capacity (which is BS claim)
I think you misunderstand. No one is blaming anyone. As I understand it, it is just a statement. It doesn't say that core worker is seeking to work at full capacity. It would make sense though in light of the new core proposal popping up, to ensure smooth transition and knowledge transfer. Those efforts
might also be covered in said new proposal, so not a blocker imho.
So how is a voter supposed to know if there are enough funds or not ?
I agree. The voter can't know without deep investigation or talking to Ryan.