Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitcrab

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 129
511
General Discussion / topics to be discussed in Shanghai
« on: July 02, 2019, 10:30:01 am »
1. core team discussions

2. marketing WP https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=28444.0

3. GS protection (updated BSIP58, protection is guaranteed by core code)
4. BSIP62:close short position https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/156
5. BSIP40:Custom active permission https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0040.md
6.committee work organization.

7. BSIP70: Lending for Margin Tradinghttps://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/170
8. mobile App WP. https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=28460.0
9.GXC&BTS cooperation.
10.smartcoin marketing/ZBG
11.cn-vote

512
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: July 01, 2019, 04:27:32 pm »
witness.hiblockchain and sahkan-bitshares, could you please explain why your feed price is reasonable?


513
General Discussion / Re: why not borrowing?
« on: June 30, 2019, 02:46:13 pm »
bitUSD supply is now down to 3.87M.

no one want to borrow more bitUSD?

this is not traditional mortgage loan, this is stable coin minting!

514
中文 (Chinese) / Re: BTS投资指南
« on: June 29, 2019, 05:54:57 am »
现在的问题是bitUSD一直进入不了随爆随吃状态,就又给做空攻击提供了机会。

515
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: June 27, 2019, 03:45:01 am »
unvoted fox.

516
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: June 26, 2019, 04:17:36 am »
unvoted datasecuritynode. poor price feeding.

517
It's not a surprise to me that bitUSD is in a premium of 2%+.
Also, comparing it with bitCNY is weird as there are not direct off-ramps for bitUSD in contrast to bitCNY.

Personally, I'd leave bitUSD alone for now and focus on further improving bitCNY.

Yes, but to shape the future, we also need to push bitUSD, and even bitEUR forward.

518
Stakeholder Proposals / [Poll] BSIP59:Reduce MSSR of bitUSD to 1.01
« on: June 24, 2019, 10:25:35 am »
As MSSR values, 1% and 2% are different at:

1. 1% will lead to better pegging at time while margin call price impact the expectation on BTS price.

2. 1% reduce the benefits of shorting BTS in half.

3. lower MSSR will make the margin call orders a little more difficult to be eaten. and may lead to some risk accumulation.

We have seen that bitCNY behaved well after the MSSR was reduced to 1.01.

Now bitUSD has a MSSR of 1.02, what we can see is that bitUSD has a 2%+ premium.

I feel it's time to bring a better pegging to bitUSD.

GS protection is already implemented in bitUSD, so no need to worry too much on black swan.

Please find BSIP59 Doc: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0059.md for detailed info of BSIP59.

Two worker proposals have been created for this poll:

1.14.207   Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitUSD to 1.01

1.14.208   Poll - BSIP59 - Keep MSSR of bitUSD as 1.02

please consider the 2 choices carefully before you vote.

519
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote投票公示
« on: June 24, 2019, 08:38:15 am »
这个cn-vote工会 还把票子投给ZBBTSBP见证人,我看到就火气,这个见证人什么时候都是倒数第一低的喂价,并且万年不更新一次,这样的见证人,几个散户组成的工会竟然也去投票,我就撤票了,希望大家也是这样,不要参与这个无实力的工会整的小孩儿科的东西,我对这个cn-vote工会撤票了,这个完全就是一些几个小散在搞的事情,没权力,没票数,没实力,不懂得炒作,不懂得推广,也没钱拉盘。

巨蟹也表示 不支持cn-vote工会的。而我 除了强烈反对 “添加内盘抵押BITCNY借BTS做空提议”之外,其它的我基本支持巨蟹。

不要乱讲,我没有不支持工会,我只是不支持工会的某些主张。
工会是做了很多有意义的工作的。


520
中文 (Chinese) / Re: BTS投资指南
« on: June 24, 2019, 03:03:37 am »
      这个思想是个亮点,让BITCNY贬值来对抗BTS价格下跌。市场下跌CNY贬值,这太重要了!现在的机制是市场下跌CNY溢价,这个现象必须改变。
   另外,LIBRA即将问世,稳定币市场无人可比,现在BTS危机重重。一定要改变CNY不能贬值的错误思想。市场下跌CNY就应该贬值。贬值的程度由市场调节,贬值多了,自然会有人大量充值CNY储存。这也是开发CNY的市场需求的一个途径。喂价不能低于市场价。

这种只是应对极端的黑天鹅状况,是在爆仓减供失效后不得已而为之的手段,并不是常规手段,如果BTS一跌bitCNY就贬值那他妈的还叫什么稳定币。

521
I think we should instead learn from the catastrophic results of the OMO fund, use the accumulated CNY to pay back the OMO debt and return the few remaining OMO funds to the reserve pool.
Use any fuiure CNY fee income to slowly buy back BTS (or maybe trade off-market against BTS, e. g. those escrowed workers that are paid in CNY) and return them to the reserve pool as well.

we want to give some impact on the market, however what you suggest has no such impact.

the OMO debt position has a CR of 3.8+, no need to pay it now, it's better to use the accumulated fees to do something else.

522
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: June 23, 2019, 03:00:34 pm »
observed at UTC 14:50 23th

kraken: BTC/USD: 10723
kraken: USDT/USD: 0.9947
bittrex: BTC/USD:  10706
bittrex: USDT/USD: 0.993
binance: BTS/BTC:  0.00000614
huobi: BTS/USDT:  0.066
huobi OTC: BTC/CNY: 74850
huobi OTC: USDT/CNY: 6.94

at the moment the market price in CNY should be about 0.459.

Warning: fox and datasecuritynode provide a price feed which is 2%+ lower than reasonable



we should develop some tools to visualize the feed price in charts and make it easy for voters to check .

523
不要搞这种没有常识的提案,净出幺蛾子,瞎折腾。

524
This proposal is to replace 1.14.200 https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=28508.0

I agree with what the China BTSer Union suggested, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=28549.0, BTS is now obviously under estimated in the market, we need to introduce more money to increase BTS holdings.

I think currently it's a good idea to use the accumulated bitCNY market fee to buy BTS, and this measure can be combined together with the left OMO issue.

1. now account committee-cnytrader owns a debt position of 451K CNY debt and 3.9M BTS collateral,  reorganize account committee-cnytrader, let the representative from CNY BTSer Union to replace witness-still,  committee-cnytrader will handle the task of buying BTS using the bitCNY market fee.

2.each time the accumulated bitCNY market fee is above 100K CNY, claim it and transfer to the cnytrader account, when BTS price is under 1CNY, the multisig members will decide the process to buy in BTS.

3. when the BTS price is above 1CNY, multisig members need to sell some BTS to pay the debt, and also accumulate bitCNY for the next down trend.

A poll worker proposal is created for this:

1.14.205   Poll - increase BTS holdings with accumulated market fee

please vote this proposal according to your opinion.

525
General Discussion / Re: bitusd peg
« on: June 21, 2019, 05:32:51 pm »
I don't think the peg is a big problem.

but I am confused that why now very few users are interested in bitUSD.

because of the black swan bitUSD lost most trust?

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 129