算了，无所谓了，爱怎么样怎么样吧，出局了，从此不提建议，不发言，不玩比特股，走了。

我们还是用心发展以前的嫩模路线吧，黑社区，好怕怕

Quote from: ebit on January 08, 2015, 07:03:26 am

评估对象1：blackwavelabs（黑潮实验室）------ 工资率:100%------打分：89分。值得期待。

评估项目：
（1.1）团队成员资料：60分。解释：官方主页只有笼统介绍，没有具体信息，有比特股社区介绍人cass。

Quote

黑潮实验室于2014年8月成立，我们目前雇佣了两个全职的开发人员以及一些兼职的客服人员，翻译者，设计者，和开发人员。

Quote

Hi Samantha,welcome on board! Guess you propose a 100% payrate delegate, right!?
Pls add this to your proposal.------cass

（1.2）团队成绩：100分。解释：根据提供的以往开发项目，可以判断其开发经验丰富。
（1.3）联系方式：50分。解释：提供了5种联系方式。但没有：qq、facebook、新浪weibo、手机电话、家庭住址。
（2.1）社区沟通：100分。解释：及时有效回复了社区疑问。
（2.2）沟通能力：100分。解释：熟练使用中英文及西班牙文。
（2.3）沟通技巧：100分。解释：能灵活回复社区疑问。

Quote

眼下这个过程很有教育意义，我们已经学习到了更多关于如何运行不同的DACs。我们正在写一篇文章去讲述这个过程的详情，以及加上我们对比特股以及社区的分析到https://blackwavelabs.com 上。

（3.1）代码质量：100分。解释：交易所运行正常；github代码编写认真。
（4.1）长期规划：100分。解释：明确为第三方角色，从技术角度实现对比特股的推广应用。

Quote

请求一个受托人职位去建造开源的API包装器，还会将比特股的功能加到我们即将开源的账户系统里面（就像第一个帖子描述的那样）。

（4.2）重点项目：100分。解释：API包装器、Vault、Bits。这些类似于打赏系统，但更复杂，应用场景更丰富。

Quote

Very good! The fact that you plan to open source the API wrapper has me sold. Voting and promoting.------toast

（4.3）重点项目规划：60分。解释：不是忽悠，有了早期版本。但尚无具体时间表。

Quote

In the current system, an independent contract worker would have to take on great risk for a commodity which many of the community will request is not liquidated. If in the rare event they are accepted, they have to wait a full two weeks before breaking even on their initial investment. This is not counting the amount of time necessary to campaign for the position in the first place, if that time is considered it could take a month to recover the costs of obtaining the position in the first place. Which may only last 2-3 months before being voted out by popular vote.

（5.1）社区口碑：100分。解释：有待加深了解。

Quote

An api wrapper is worth the cost. Once that is complete we can re-examine whether the delegate is still worth it, but for now we really should vote these guys in.------toast

（5.2）承诺履行情况：：100分。解释：有待加深了解。

Quote

To again clarify, we plan on creating and releasing the API Wrapper and the other listed projects open source regardless if we are elected as a delegate.

We propose that if the BitShares community offer support for our ongoing mission of promoting all innovative cryptocurrencies and providing high quality open source tools. Selecting our development group as a delegate, the community would allow us to allocate more resources to the listed projects (and other unannounced projects that are in planning) so that they can be completed quicker.

不错，

我能说这个评估简直是儿戏吗？其他不说就说这些：
（5.2）承诺履行情况：：100分。解释：有待加深了解。--------这活才开始干你就100分啊
（5.1）社区口碑：100分。解释：有待加深了解。 ---------- 你是把中文社区的质疑当点赞吗
（3.1）代码质量：100分。解释：交易所运行正常；github代码编写认真。--------你写过代码吗，你见过一个无BUG的软件吗。

对于普通待股者，你这能叫评估吗？

dev 0.50官方下载地址：https://github.com/BitShares/DevShares/releases/tag/dvs%2F0.5.0

Quote from: Empirical1.1 on January 09, 2015, 07:35:26 am

Edit: Given that you have a personal relationship and friendship with these guys, I can see why you personally wouldn't want to be seen as being involved with a direct Bitcoin competitor. It's possible though that this dynamic could cloud your objectivity with regards to how BitShares should approach marketing.

It is a valid question.  I believe my thoughts are grounded logic and strategy though. 

I recall an article from a former senior management type from Skype who said behind closed doors they knew Skype was a direct competitor and had superior technology and costs than existing telephony technology. Their mission was to replace that industry. Strategically they decided to not position themselves as a telephony company at all for fear of regulatory obstacles created by the legacy telephony lobbyists. All be it for a different reason it is certainly a valid option to not go head to head with the 400 pound gorilla in the right circumstances.

In our case.
1. Our next wave of users, developers, eveangelists, marketers, and investors are most likely to come from the bitcoin space.
2. Every bitcoin enthusiast has been told by the majority of their friends that they were crazy for buying bitcoin and that they would lose money. There is tremendous ego involved to see bitcoin succeed for that reason, not just financial. Telling their friends they were right about crypto but wrong about bitcoin will not cut it at the next BBQ.
3. It costs a lot of money which we do not have to get the attention of many eyeballs and educate them on our brand new industry. Bitcoin enthusiasts are fanatical and will happily read any article that speaks highly of bitcoin posted on reddit. That means lots of free eyeballs that are the right eyeballs.

In my opinion it is strategically foolish to not take advantage of 3, by not acknowledging 2 and thus missing out on 1.

Btw, how many people have you successfully sold the concept of bitshares too?  Have you had much success with "we are better than bitcoin?" (Genuine question, not cheeky at all.)

agree no more 

100%支付就是少数人的游戏，根本就和去中心化背道而行，
开发，市场，普通人懂吗？话语权总是在少数几个人手上，小白也只能跟着投票，有多少人能正确评估对系统所做的贡献，带来的流量和收益。

Quote from: delulo on December 28, 2014, 03:23:58 pm

10% AGS 10 % PTS and 80% BTS would make everyone (heavily invested in bts) happy.

The question is, will a 100% BTS make you unhappy?

We know a lot of the debate was not due to the ratios but due to AGS/PTS being considered.

YES,this is not good

请问一下有无官方下载地址？