0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: xeroc on November 19, 2015, 08:48:07 amQuote from: bytemaster on November 18, 2015, 10:27:55 pmAccounts that have been referred and misconfigured cannot be corrected, allfuture referral fees from those accounts will be stuck at 0.6%. We are doingan audit of what the potential losses are of future referral income from thoseaccounts and will come up with a fair resolution for those who are adverselyaffected.That is very unfortunate .. especially for @fav. Anyway, to me this means thatthe referral party can no begin, doesn't it?Was it all referred accounts up to this point?
Quote from: bytemaster on November 18, 2015, 10:27:55 pmAccounts that have been referred and misconfigured cannot be corrected, allfuture referral fees from those accounts will be stuck at 0.6%. We are doingan audit of what the potential losses are of future referral income from thoseaccounts and will come up with a fair resolution for those who are adverselyaffected.That is very unfortunate .. especially for @fav. Anyway, to me this means thatthe referral party can no begin, doesn't it?
Accounts that have been referred and misconfigured cannot be corrected, allfuture referral fees from those accounts will be stuck at 0.6%. We are doingan audit of what the potential losses are of future referral income from thoseaccounts and will come up with a fair resolution for those who are adverselyaffected.
Quote from: funnybear on November 19, 2015, 12:46:54 pmI'm not sure if this fix introduced another problem, but please see the membership tab for any newly created accounts by openledger-reg.I'm seeing crazy values in the fee allocation table, like -2950% for registrar and 3000% for affiliate referrer. What is going on?This will be fixed in today's GUI release.
I'm not sure if this fix introduced another problem, but please see the membership tab for any newly created accounts by openledger-reg.I'm seeing crazy values in the fee allocation table, like -2950% for registrar and 3000% for affiliate referrer. What is going on?
Ben has done a thorough analysis of what has happened and we have identified the problem as being two bugs that "hid" each other.1. The faucet was misconfigured (forgot to scale the percentage by 100) 2. The GUI was misinterpreting the data (forgot to divide the percentage by 100)The end result is that Open Ledger has been receiving 99.4% and the affiliate has been receiving .6%. We have taken steps to correct the faucet for all future accounts. We are creating a tool to calculate the amount OL owes the various parties and will transfer the missing funds to them.Accounts that have been referred and misconfigured cannot be corrected, all future referral fees from those accounts will be stuck at 0.6%. We are doing an audit of what the potential losses are of future referral income from those accounts and will come up with a fair resolution for those who are adversely affected.Once again, we apologize for the mistakes. The good news is this issue was not a blockchain level issue.
The end result is that Open Ledger has been receiving 99.4% and the affiliate has been receiving .6%. Accounts that have been referred and misconfigured cannot be corrected, all future referral fees from those accounts will be stuck at 0.6%.
We are doing an audit of what the potential losses are of future referral income from those accounts and will come up with a fair resolution for those who are adversely affected.
Quote from: fav on November 18, 2015, 11:37:59 amCnx is the sole developer of bts (and holding copyrights). Im doing business with them. Especially in this case since its based on their work/responsibility wrong again .. they develop Graphene which has been licensed to BitShares under some conditions.Hence, dealing with BitShares does NOT imply dealing with CNX
Cnx is the sole developer of bts (and holding copyrights). Im doing business with them. Especially in this case since its based on their work/responsibility
'Pride comes before the fall'
Quote from: fav on November 18, 2015, 09:35:58 amQuote from: liondani on November 18, 2015, 08:12:33 amQuote from: fav on November 18, 2015, 06:43:28 amUpdate another lifetime upgrade, I'm now missing 18000 bitshares in vesting. Starting to get expensive for cryptonomex.is "cryptonomex" your nickname ? Sorry for not being clear: cryptonomex is the company I'm doing business with Actually, you are not ... you are doing business with BitShares. CNX is contractor of BitShares (once they have their workers) .. they don't run BTS
Quote from: liondani on November 18, 2015, 08:12:33 amQuote from: fav on November 18, 2015, 06:43:28 amUpdate another lifetime upgrade, I'm now missing 18000 bitshares in vesting. Starting to get expensive for cryptonomex.is "cryptonomex" your nickname ? Sorry for not being clear: cryptonomex is the company I'm doing business with
Quote from: fav on November 18, 2015, 06:43:28 amUpdate another lifetime upgrade, I'm now missing 18000 bitshares in vesting. Starting to get expensive for cryptonomex.is "cryptonomex" your nickname ?
Update another lifetime upgrade, I'm now missing 18000 bitshares in vesting. Starting to get expensive for cryptonomex.
Quote from: fav on November 18, 2015, 06:43:28 amUpdate another lifetime upgrade, I'm now missing 18000 bitshares in vesting. Starting to get expensive for cryptonomex. The amount you see is NOT written on the database .. it is purely calculated from the transactions .. (at least that's what I assume)So in the end ... you will get your money even though the client doesn't show it that way ..
Sell the servitude, buy the freedom!
one of my refs http://cryptofresh.com/u/first-personal upgraded to lifetime, since I offer 50% cashback.so I should see 60% (12k) vesting, which did not happen. checked cli. what's wrong, and am I losing money? @bytemaster Code: [Select][{ "id": "1.13.52", "owner": "1.2.21106", "balance": { "amount": 687162463, "asset_id": "1.3.0" }, "policy": [ 1,{ "vesting_seconds": 7776000, "start_claim": "1970-01-01T00:00:00", "coin_seconds_earned": "631119312288000", "coin_seconds_earned_last_update": "2015-11-13T02:22:36" }edit: I'm going to pay my referral 10k cashback as per agreement. I expect 10k BTS to fav from Cryptonomex, should this be a bug/number glitch.LTM: 2Missing BTS: 12k
[{ "id": "1.13.52", "owner": "1.2.21106", "balance": { "amount": 687162463, "asset_id": "1.3.0" }, "policy": [ 1,{ "vesting_seconds": 7776000, "start_claim": "1970-01-01T00:00:00", "coin_seconds_earned": "631119312288000", "coin_seconds_earned_last_update": "2015-11-13T02:22:36" }
Quote from: mf-tzo on November 17, 2015, 03:52:17 pmQuote from: fav on November 17, 2015, 01:03:51 pm5 days no answer the fact that you have not received any answer for that is indeed a bit disturbing.. We should know if the referral does work or if we should hold our horses..As this already turned into non technical thread, I should mention something not clear from this discussion. - fav already paid me the 10K BTS cashback [I told him to wait until this issue is cleared, but he did anyway.]Quote from: lil_jay890 on November 17, 2015, 03:58:29 pmI just can't wait to hand over 50 grand for CNX's next worker proposals!eagerly here, as well.+ 1
Quote from: fav on November 17, 2015, 01:03:51 pm5 days no answer the fact that you have not received any answer for that is indeed a bit disturbing.. We should know if the referral does work or if we should hold our horses..
5 days no answer
I just can't wait to hand over 50 grand for CNX's next worker proposals!
fav already paid me the 10K BTS cashback [I told him to wait until this issue is cleared, but he did anyway.]
I lost 750K...and BM called it "smooth sailing with just a few people losing money."
@bytemaster @Stan anyone home?
@bytemaster CNX owes me 12k bts now.
after some discussions on telegramlooks like I vest 6k instead of 12k which means they forgot to adjust some numbers after the upgrade cost change from 10k to 20k@bytemaster can you confirm?
if they do not vest(or show at all for that matter), I do not expect any payment. For that part no worries, favbut yee, Why this does not show? It is past the 1h vesting period.