With this new type of measurement you can define the real wealth of everything. Because everything in our universe uses energy.
The "real" wealth is very different from the "economic" wealth ( capitalism monetary wealth).
Let me know if I'm being a stickler or missing the point, but I see a lot of posts like this. I'm glad that you realize that wealth is not measured with current currencies, but it seems to me that you are trying to find a different currency model with which you can measure (true) wealth.
The problems with this is that wealth just like value is a subjective thing. What you consider wealth I might consider trash and vice versa.
Today at work I was looking at a recently vacated positions pay grade. It's within field of expertise, and I'd have a decent shot at getting it. This pay grade would give me a roughly $40k per year raise. I'm not rich, this is a decent chunk of change for me. It would however require me to travel a lot, probably even relocate to LA. The result is that I am not interested.
Now maybe if I was having a hard time making ends meet, or was single it would be more attractive to me, but I'm happy and comfortable, and dare I say still in love. That in my opinion makes me more wealthy than if I took this position.
I'm going to badly paraphrase bastiat here. Wealth cannot be measured in money or in the sign of money, but rather in the real satisfactions of our daily lives.
If I've missed the point please ignore me. I'm a big fan of competing currencies. Just don't pretend that they are a measure of wealth or value.