Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Fox

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
211
General Discussion / Re: Brownie Distribution Update
« on: July 30, 2015, 09:42:05 pm »
@fuzzy !!WOW!! What effort you are putting forth here. Host, bookkeeper, key grip, the list goes on. Thanks so much.

Please mark me down as "fox" for all columns, as my mobile is failing to comment on the document at this time (surely it cannot be _my_ issue).

212
Technical Support / Re: Syncing issues
« on: July 19, 2015, 11:55:18 am »
To speed the blockchain sync process you may consider reviewing a thread maintained by fav where a recent copy of the chain folder is available to download:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,16510.0.html

Surely trust is involved with this method. Although I have not downloaded and used the offered chain, I know th reputation of fav to be trustworthy at this time.

213
Technical Support / Re: Syncing issues
« on: July 19, 2015, 11:44:29 am »
Using the CLI you may get your version number within the client by issuing:
Code: [Select]
get_info
You may also get the version number from the command line by starting the client with the version switch:
Code: [Select]
./bitshare_client --version

214
@Clayop thanks for the reference!  Turns out my prerequisites were missing both the libtool and autoconf packages.  With those both added the build went straight away within the Graphene build script.  I did not need to build it separately prior. 

215
Requesting assistance with building Graphene on Ubuntu 14.04LTS.  I have reviewed the Build Ubuntu documentation for Graphene [1] and taken care to verify Boost 1.57 is referenced within the CMake script.  However, the build fails within 'project_secp256k1' with the output:
Code: [Select]
[  6%] Performing autogen step for 'project_secp256k1'
/home/myUser/graphene/libraries/fc/vendor/secp256k1-zkp/autogen.sh: 3: /home/myUser/graphene/libraries/fc/vendor/secp256k1-zkp/autogen.sh: autoreconf: not found
make[2]: *** [libraries/fc/vendor/secp256k1-zkp/src/project_secp256k1-stamp/./project_secp256k1-autogen] Error 127
make[1]: *** [libraries/fc/CMakeFiles/project_secp256k1.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
myHost:~/graphene$
[1] https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/wiki/build-ubuntu

I did review closed Issue #76 [2] which references this library and similar build issues.  Those changes were merged into Master three weeks back, so perhaps this is new, yet related.
[2] https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/76

For troubleshooting purposes I'll include:
  • My Graphene Build Script
  • CMake Output
  • Make Output

My Graphene Build Script
Code: [Select]
# Prep Server
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get -y install dphys-swapfile

# Install Prerequisite Packages
sudo apt-get -y install ntp cmake git libreadline-dev uuid-dev g++ libdb++-dev libdb-dev zip libssl-dev openssl build-essential python-dev autotools-dev libicu-dev libbz2-dev libboost-dev libboost-all-dev

# Install Boost 1.57
wget -c 'http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.57.0/boost_1_57_0.tar.bz2/download'
tar -xf download
cd boost_1_57_0/
./bootstrap.sh --prefix=/usr/local/
./b2 install

# Install Graphene
git clone https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene.git
git submodule update --init --recursive
cmake -DBOOST_ROOT="/usr/local/" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug .
make -j4

CMake Output
Code: [Select]
myHost:~/graphene$ sudo cmake -DBOOST_ROOT="/usr/local/" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug .
-- Using custom FindBoost.cmake
-- Boost version: 1.57.0
-- Found the following Boost libraries:
--   thread
--   date_time
--   system
--   filesystem
--   program_options
--   signals
--   serialization
--   chrono
--   unit_test_framework
--   context
--   locale
-- Using custom FindBoost.cmake
-- Boost version: 1.57.0
-- Found the following Boost libraries:
--   coroutine
-- Configuring Graphene on Linux
-- Using  as BerkeleyDB root
-- Looking for: db_cxx-6.0
-- debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdb_cxx.sooptimized/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdb_cxx.so
-- Configuring project fc located in: /home/myUser/graphene/libraries/fc
-- Configuring fc to build on Unix/Apple
-- Using custom FindBoost.cmake
-- Boost version: 1.57.0
-- Found the following Boost libraries:
--   thread
--   date_time
--   system
--   filesystem
--   program_options
--   signals
--   serialization
--   chrono
--   unit_test_framework
--   context
--   locale
--   iostreams
--   coroutine
** websocketpp

=========== Used Build Configuration =============

-- ENABLE_CPP11        = ON
-- BUILD_EXAMPLES      = OFF
-- BUILD_TESTS         = OFF

-- WEBSOCKETPP_ROOT    = /home/myUser/graphene/libraries/fc/vendor/websocketpp
-- WEBSOCKETPP_BIN     = /home/myUser/graphene/libraries/fc/vendor/websocketpp/bin
-- WEBSOCKETPP_LIB     = /home/myUser/graphene/libraries/fc/vendor/websocketpp/lib
-- Install prefix      = /usr/local

-- WEBSOCKETPP_BOOST_LIBS        =
-- WEBSOCKETPP_PLATFORM_LIBS     =
-- WEBSOCKETPP_PLATFORM_TSL_LIBS =

-- Could NOT find Curses (missing:  CURSES_LIBRARY CURSES_INCLUDE_PATH)
-- Finished fc module configuration...
-- Could NOT find Doxygen (missing:  DOXYGEN_EXECUTABLE)
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have been written to: /home/myUser/graphene

Make Output
Code: [Select]
myHost:~/graphene$ sudo make
[  0%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/api.cpp.o
[  1%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/buffer.cpp.o
[  1%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/cache.cpp.o
[  2%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/ccc.cpp.o
[  2%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/channel.cpp.o
[  3%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/common.cpp.o
[  3%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/core.cpp.o
[  4%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/epoll.cpp.o
[  4%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/list.cpp.o
[  5%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/md5.cpp.o
[  5%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/packet.cpp.o
[  6%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/queue.cpp.o
[  6%] Building CXX object libraries/fc/vendor/udt4/CMakeFiles/udt.dir/src/window.cpp.o
Linking CXX static library libudt_debug.a
[  6%] Built target udt
[  6%] Performing autogen step for 'project_secp256k1'
/home/myUser/graphene/libraries/fc/vendor/secp256k1-zkp/autogen.sh: 3: /home/myUser/graphene/libraries/fc/vendor/secp256k1-zkp/autogen.sh: autoreconf: not found
make[2]: *** [libraries/fc/vendor/secp256k1-zkp/src/project_secp256k1-stamp/./project_secp256k1-autogen] Error 127
make[1]: *** [libraries/fc/CMakeFiles/project_secp256k1.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
myHost:~/graphene$

Any suggestion for troubleshooting is greatly appreciated.

216
@SolomonSollarsNSense: Congratulations on one month as a 100% delegate. Feels like a great opportunity to provide the community with a status update on your progress, problems and plans.
Respectfully as always,
Fox

217
General Discussion / Re: VOTE OUT THESE DELEGATES NOW! (Please)
« on: June 25, 2015, 12:49:28 am »
Welcome NickJames to the boards. As you continue to explore BitShares and the community members, add those delegates to you slate that you feel deserve your support. Many have their delegate names in their signature, as they mm not match their forum name.

Personal recommendation for your consideration:
1.  Choose delegates that produce blocks properly (remove those that don't; the point of this thread)
2.  Choose a diverse set of delegates rather than multiple from a single entity (support decentralization)
3.  Choose delegates that publish accurate feeds (remind those not doing so)
4.  Send a transaction to yourself with your BTS stake to complete the vote (repeat after each update)

Again, welcome,
Fox


218
General Discussion / Re: VOTE OUT THESE DELEGATES NOW! (Please)
« on: June 23, 2015, 05:27:51 am »
Gratitude to John Galt for his contributions to the BitShares community through the Galt Report and beyond. 

As you adjust your voting slate to remove these two delegates, please note the standby delegates just outside the 101 active threshold.  It was but a few weeks back when we adjusted our slates to push out the two inactive yunbi delegates.  Today they are poised to be reelected.  Please consider adding other diverse delegates, such as these active community members:
  fav, ihashfury, luckybit, kencode and robrigo

Respectfully,
Fox

219
Technical Support / Re: 2.0 local server via a raspberry pi?
« on: June 22, 2015, 06:47:06 pm »
Yes, both Graphene and BitShares currently run on the RPi2. You must comment out the Salsa references in the build scripts to compile correctly, as they will not build on the RPi2 processor at this time.

220
 I'll setup the additional feeds a bit later in the day in support of the community.

Reminder: Please check that your slates includes Fox.

221
General Discussion / Re: Delegate of the Month
« on: June 06, 2015, 04:43:42 pm »
Great work by the entire Beyond Bitcoins Team. Well deserved. Really appreciate your efforts and community building.

222
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 0.9.2 Feedback
« on: May 20, 2015, 03:17:34 am »
DevShares is a tool to help prevent problems with BitShares upgrades. It is not a perfect tool, and cannot help with some parts of the upgrade process because the DevShares network has a completely different state from the BitShares network, and hardforks happen at different times between the two networks. So we use this tool at our discretion, but by definition the code will never be exactly the same between the two networks.

In particular, the BitShares 0.9.2 release contains changes to code which is not executed in DevShares: https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/compare/bts/0.9.1...bts/0.9.2

@vikram Your reply is quite helpful in allowing me to see the identified changes and why they in fact must be different in each network.

Respectfully,
Fox

223
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 0.9.2 Feedback
« on: May 19, 2015, 12:54:53 am »
I have some concerns about the bts/0.9.2 release as I do not see the code previously released to the dvs/0.9.x network for testing.  It is my understanding that all code in BitShares will go through DevShares first for testing.

DevShares:
20 APR 2015 | Latest commit [1]

BitShares:
18 MAY 2015 | bts/0.9.2 [2]
04 MAY 2015 | bts/0.9.1
24 APR 2015 | bts/0.9.0

Request:
Please help me understand the decision process used to release the bts/0.9.2 code into the BitShares network. 

References:
[1] https://github.com/BitShares/DevShares/commits/master
[2] https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/commits/master

224
General Discussion / Re: What are causes of pending?
« on: May 12, 2015, 11:30:10 am »
I experienced the same with 0.9.0 when registering UIA and new account names. Had client set to minimum network transaction fee (0.1 BTS). 10's of zero transaction blocks would pass while my transactions were in pending state. Most of these pending transactions were included in blocks with other transactions rather than on their own.

225
General Discussion / Re: Ripple News
« on: May 08, 2015, 05:04:16 am »
In the event that Invictus is fined it will not impact the future of BitShares, it will only impact my own personal financial situation.   I suspect that this community would have my back and we will all move past it.

There is nothing to fear except fear itself.


Yup, there I am.

No, in the back behind the scenes. That's me. Not a Super Hero; just keeping the network running for this community. Now get out the vote won't ya! 
-Fox

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23