For that allocation I'm not giving numbers because it'll just make you feel bad because it's not much. Also it was never promised before deciding to give the bonus so there is no "correct" amount - the call for how much to give vs normal balances and exchange unclaimed balances was made manually.
I don't understand. According to this I would expect something that does not make the ones that got burned feel bad:
This allocation should [..] make everyone who purchased DNS whole.
"BTC38 (and now BTER) retroactive snapshot - lots of DNS holders made whole"
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10446.0
My DNS sharedrop ration seems to be 0.0166 and yes this makes me feel bad and nowhere near 'made whole'.
So it seems to show no sign of compensation. To make it a bit more tangible: that roughly an 75% loss (cut by half twice)
It looks like other people on this thread have other ratios. I already asked multiple times for help to look into it, but nobody could help me.
Just throw me a link or the method. I don't need polished tools. If I can get there using grep/sed/cat I should be fine.
For convenience, the questions again:
- (How) can I map/link the incoming transactions to the keys that are holding the DNS?
- Or how can I check how many DNS a key holds? rtfm + a pointer will work for me
- Further, is it correct that the DNS which have been moved before BM's post should have gotten some compensation and therefore should show a higher sharedrop ratio than 0.0166/0.0186?
Further, can someone explain how "make everyone who purchased DNS whole" turned into "'not giving numbers because it'll just make you feel bad because it's not much"?
If I am wrong or missed something, let me know.