don't worry . no harm will be done to bts community but getting some free lotto coins from "free trade"
光头强还是不错的..当初送的mmc还卖了快2000块呢.点他的赞..
他因为送给pts的mmc成功做了广告效应,用百分之十都不到的股份成功将自己开发的一个一文不值的虚拟币(没有好平台愿意上架,还是变相预挖的定期发工资币)变成了一个价值几元的币,每天每个管理员(都是支持他的阵营)分发500个币的工资,初期每天套利接近万元rmb,现在没有利润了直接抛下走人不管了,留着mmc社区等死。他的态度是,你们当然可以投票取消我的拿工资的管理职位,但同时他也保留在没有好处的情况下停止参与对这个币的更新维护。这些都在mmc论坛板块的历史帖子上。
要是知道他的行事方式和思维方式,会觉得他根本不是将虚拟币当成是一个事业,而仅仅是一个赚快钱的途径。他作为原始的拥有者,拥有大量的币,他不想着提升币的价值而得到好处,而是通过发工资这种浅视的办法为自己和自己阵营获益,结果海量的工资发出去了,不仅没有提升社区的价值,反而每天在市场上造成了巨大的抛压(几个管理员每天一共几千个币,一个月抛出的就是十几万人民币的资金,对这种市场深度小的小众币来说杀伤力多大?)
现在mmc论坛都在骂他,连lotto分给mmc这事都不在mmc论坛宣传,让人赶不上deadline。
这实在赞不了。
光头强若看到此贴,请主动不要往我地址送币,我实在不想和你扯上关系,谢谢。
Stan,I strongly recommend you read all the post on mmc child forum,and know exactly what kind of person you're in bed with.How he treats this like a quick money game instead of a sustainable business.I can predict that within three months , the mmc story will happen again,and 3i and PTS 's name is gonna drag deeper with it .
Since you brought it up, and without making any value judgements about any particular developer, what should the BitShares community's policy be about promoting developers who (wisely) choose to honor PTS and AGS?
We have said in the past that, as long as there is not an legal/ethical/philosophical conflict, any DAC that honors the community will be honored by the community.
My absurd example was that "Slavetrader, DAC" would probably not qualify.
Should we be involved in vetting 3rd party developers? Or should we just be appreciative of anyone who thinks enough of this community to seek its support?
All right.I'll imagine this for you.
Say,I developed a coin called "JobCoin",intend to provide a information business that let people find jobs and let company hire people,they should use my "JobCoin" to pay to post their information.
I premine 100%,then give 50% to PTS and AGS (very good,right ? I'm a good guy at the eyes of 3i).But,hey,this 50% has to be locked for 3 month to longer time before it will be trade able.
Now, by the power of 3i promotion , JobCoin successfully get on all major trading platforms.Since it's promoted by 3i,then the market would love this coin from the start,my 50% coin can sell at a good price.
After selling the coin,I get say ....200K USD easily.Then , I can get off to the sunset and enjoy some quality time with my loaded wallet.
And then , I don't need to maintain this coin anymore. But hey , the community can curse me .That's my wrong doing ,I can take it .
The problem is ,the community won't just hate me . They see this "JobCoin" as 3i's product,no matter how you explain the concept of "3rd party".For example , during that time Feb. 28th which lead to PTS's price boost , some big time MMC dealer also said that MMC is a "3i related product,and because PTS has good news,MMC is bound to rise." That's the real relationship between 3i and 3rd party DAC.They ignore the "3rd" part.
So,if you say I just need to give PTS and AGS a share,you would support me no matter what ,then I think more developer would join this pool. The problem is ,
if 3i can really separate itself from the potential harm or bad act by the 3rd party DAC 3i's promoting ?
I think the 3rd party != full immunity for 3i,at least on a public image level.If 3rd party DAC do good, 3i will benefited .But what if other wise ?
PS. I just image the worst way of doing the wrong thing,not that will surely happen,not that anyone done this or can do this.
But , Can I do this ? That's the real question.
You have presented a valid concern.
Sooner or later something bad like this could happen.
The alternative is to give up on teaming with many great 3rd Party DACs.
It is generally not possible to know the difference in advance.
If we did a small (affordable) amount of due diligence, this could make matters worse. Then there would be an expectation that we are guaranteeing a perfect outcome. And no such guarantee is possible.
The choice seems to be:
Support
no 3rd Party DACs
Support
all 3rd Party DACs.
As soon as we decline one, the expectation is that we are smart enough to decline all bad and accept all good. A slippery slope?
Do you see any better alternatives?