61
Technical Support / Re: BitShares-2.15.286-66c18c6-win64-cli-tools.exe not installing correctly
« on: October 28, 2015, 03:06:09 am »
Ok, thanks. Yeah, I usually use the GUI. I'll also try out the light wallet.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Now that the gray area regarding what the social consensus has become, and how PTS relates to that has been clarified I would like to point this thread back to the original topic again.
Do you guys think future developers are likely to honor PTS? Why or why not?
If future developers wish to tap into investors, whose primary interest is investing in new and innovative Bitshares DACs, then they should honour PTS.
To my mind, there is a clear demarcation between BTS (the Invictus 'SuperDAC') and PTS (a mechanism by which people can invest in future 'third party' Bitshares DACs).
My investment in BTS is proportionate to my belief in the success of the BTS DAC.
My investment in PTS is proportionate to my belief that (a) there are/ will be developers out there creating future Bitshares DACs and (b) these developers will target PTS holders with a sharedrop in accordance with the social consensus. They will also target this demographic in the knowledge that PTS holders have a track record of evaluating the value propositions of a variety of Bitshares DACs (e.g. BTS, Music, Play, Sparkle etc.) and taking informed decisions on whether to invest further in their enterprise.
Obviously, developers are (and always have been) free to Sharedrop as they wish. However from what I've read and understood from the posts over the last few months, there is nothing to suggest a change the social consensus. From what I can tell, PTS is not only alive and well but has been upgraded, with most (including the exchanges) accepting the upgrade to DPOS-PTS.
You are totally fine ... you latest block age (second line) shows a number in the seconds
You can also try
blockchain_is_synched
I installed 0.2.24 and it syncs most of the way but it slows down at the very end. It gets to the point where as soon as a block is synced, a new block comes along. So it never finishes.do you get these info from the GUI .. or from typing "getinfo" in the console?
have you tried "getinfo" in the console?