He complains about coins that are "forked" or "premined", but bitshares falls into that category. Let's not forget our bitshares history, folks!
We made up the term "sharedrop", but all it really is is a gentleman's premine.
No, it's not. People complain that our chain isn't private enough. Everytime a Bitshares user makes (or receives) a transaction, you can observe it. This is a lot different than most coins where they just have a garbled hash for a wallet address.
Bitshares wallets are easily identifiable and thus, auditable when a sharedrop occurred. There was no foul play with Bitshares.
However other coins, like the ones where the developer releases buggy code, the chain starts, and 90% of the people can't get it to run correctly allows the developer to get his hands on a sizeable number of coins fraudulently, and then release working code an hour or two later. This has happened multiple times. If I remember correctly Dash / Darkcoin started this way back in the early days if you can read the original Darkcoin launch threads that have not been edited.