BitShares Forum
Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: Empirical1 on August 11, 2014, 10:22:07 pm
-
1. BitShares DNS is launching with the TLD .p2p and may also offer TLD's like .own & .key
BitShares.p2p
Apple.own
Google.key
2. However it may also be technically possible to replace the dot '.' with something else like a '_' and then be able to offer the letters from ICANN domains such as _com too. Web addresses that end in just a _ will also be possible.
Apple_
Google_com
Wikipedia_org
Bitshares_p2p
Which of the two approaches do you prefer/you think would be more popular?
-
other options are
/ is right beside . and dont need to hit shift key
= is an easier choice than + as do not have to hit shift key( not sure this really matters?)
Bitshares/com
Bitshares=com
-
other options are
/ is right beside . and dont need to hit shift key
= is an easier choice than + as do not have to hit shift key( not sure this really matters?)
Bitshares/com
Bitshares=com
not every keyboard layout is the same ...
-
It seems pointless to discuss something we have already concluded is not technically feasible.. backwards compatibility and playing nice with ICANN namespace are both critical
-
If we want TLDs widely adapted etc.
BitShares.p2p
BitShares.own
BitShares.key
only traditional .TLDs working IMO
-
I will edit the poll to reflect the underscore option
Edit: Done
-
google,com
, .
-
google,com
, .
I think the underscore option as in google_com was the only one that might be backwards compatible.
(Otherwise I would have preferred a + or a !)
I'm passionate about the idea of brand_com's and just brand_ hence the poll but am happy to be proved wrong by the market because all I really want is to maximise my investment.
I'm also seeing PTS increasing while Namecoin is struggling. (Namecoin down 10% yesterday.)
This is also a very good sign for the .p2p DAC in it's current form.