301
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Delegate proposal] martin-38ptswarrior-raum
« on: March 04, 2016, 02:41:12 am »
looks like he dumped all his bts as well...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think a key difference is that they and the market are clear on what industry they will dominate in 'The New (Decentralized) World.'
Ethereum - Decentralized Apps
MaidSafe - Decentralized Data
Bitcoin - Decentralized Gold
Augur - Decentralized PM (Gambling)
BitShares - Decentralized Bank & Exchange
Congrats on getting a job.
I don't quite get why you are posting all this stuff though... As far as I can tell all your workers got voted in and you set the pay. If you wanted more pay, why didn't you ask for more? You kind of sound like the guy who quits or gets fired and says "That company is screwed without me, I'm irreplaceable!" . Life does go on and so will bitshares. Whether your working for it or not.
You certainly got a wrong impression.
The issue was (and kind of still is) .. that my worker wouldn't make it if Bytemaster didn't vote for it (I actually asked him NOT to vote for it, but it seems it is to late) ..
The problem here is that I have deliberately not searched for a regular job because my impression was that my work here is appreciated and could be funded for longer ..
Only due to the anti-dilution discussion and the decisions of one individual, this worker would not have been approved .. which is a big issue not only for me!
The reasons I didn't want BM to vote for my workers is very simple: BitShares deserves to be more independent from CNX and it is very unfortunate that it currently can't be because of this one proxy!
Anyway, if the subsequent workers are approved .. I of course will put the promised time into BitShares .. the other "job" is also just a freelancing just for about 20h/week (at most) .. and I do have quite some things on my list to do .. not just coding and docs
Thanks
That "stable income" is however not going to bring much value to BitShares ..
localhost sent 5,000,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
4 hours ago
Literally every time I see these posts it reminds me of a major flaw of bitshares and makes me want to sell it.
But go ahead you guys, keep posting this every time anyone with a decent amount of BTS sends soem to poloniex.
Exactly!
Btw localhost is probably enjoying this transfer, anyone in the future that transfers so many bts in an exchange without stealth will be viewed with distrust.
It is natural for investors/speculators to be interested in any bts buying and selling activities by major shareholders. This happens to the real world stock trading too. Let's take it in stride.
Mumble is still asking for a certificate and rejecting entry into the room... 2nd week in a row mumble isn't working for me and I'm guessing many others... glad to see this is being back burnered even after it messed up the Roger Ver hangout.
Users need certificates instead of passwords according to the wiki, have you tried making a new account or using it as a new user? Maybe it's something wrong with your certificate and if you enter as a different user you can get it right
https://wiki.mumble.info/wiki/Mumble_Certificates
irrespective of if its back or not we should know why this happened and we should find ways this not to happen again and have alternatives..this is one of our competitive advantage vs. external exchanges that no matter how many people trade or if the external exchanges are DDOS, the bts DEX always work!
You mean dump 30% of reserve fund to the market? It's about 300M. I don't even believe there are so many bit assets exist.prices of the cryptocoins by nature are very volatile. This is the reason why we should use stable bitAssets as payment for workers: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21449.msg278949.html#msg278949
Every worker should get exactly this amount of money which he need to provide a good service. For USA citizen this will be X bitUSD, for Chinese citizen this will be Y bitCNY.
The reserve fund needs to hold an assortment of bitassets. It reduces the reserve fund risk and allows developers to be paid in their preferred currency. It also promotes the entire BTS ecosystem, instead of just the bts token.
The reserve fund should act like sovereign wealth fund. Constantly rebalancing it's holdings. For starters, the reserve fund should hold 70% bts and split the other 30% between bitUSD, bitCNY, bitEUR bitBTC and bitGLD. This would promote 5 bts currencies and improve liquidity while attracting dev's who may not want to get paid in a constantly fluctuating asset. Fluctuating assets are nightmares to report for taxes.