Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lil_jay890

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 80
301
looks like he dumped all his bts as well...

302
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 03, 2016, 08:36:50 pm »
It would be the most bitshares thing ever if it got added to azure and the fell in price...

303
I think a key difference is that they and the market are clear on what industry they will dominate in 'The New (Decentralized) World.'

Ethereum     - Decentralized Apps
MaidSafe     - Decentralized Data
Bitcoin          - Decentralized Gold   
Augur           - Decentralized PM (Gambling)     
BitShares    - Decentralized Bank & Exchange





This type of graphic is found on almost every Alt-coin forum... except subtract bitshares and insert other alt-coin.  I was just perusing the nxt forum and saw a very similar graphic.  It just shows that most people know what the top coins will be, but have some false hope that their alt fits in with them.

304
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum price discussion
« on: March 01, 2016, 04:40:26 pm »
...this is depressing

305
General Discussion / Re: Trustless, Decentralized Bond Market Draft
« on: February 28, 2016, 08:14:04 pm »
Calling this a bond market is misleading...  It doesn't have any of the charactertics of a bond.

There's no call date and no coupon.  Also the collateralization of this doesn't fit the description of a traditional bond market.

To properly do a bond market, there needs to be some sort of reputation system in place so that investors can evaluate risk.  Lending to an anonymous person you no nothing about is a non-starter.


306
Congrats on getting a job.

I don't quite get why you are posting all this stuff though... As far as I can tell all your workers got voted in and you set the pay.  If you wanted more pay, why didn't you ask for more?  You kind of sound like the guy who quits or gets fired and says "That company is screwed without me, I'm irreplaceable!" . Life does go on and so will bitshares.  Whether your working for it or not.

You certainly got a wrong impression.

The issue was (and kind of still is) .. that my worker wouldn't make it if Bytemaster didn't vote for it (I actually asked him NOT to vote for it, but it seems it is to late) ..
The problem here is that I have deliberately not searched for a regular job because my impression was that my work here is appreciated and could be funded for longer ..
Only due to the anti-dilution discussion and the decisions of one individual, this worker would not have been approved .. which  is a big issue not only for me!

The reasons I didn't want BM to vote for my workers is very simple: BitShares deserves to be more independent from CNX and it is very unfortunate that it currently can't be because of this one proxy!

Anyway, if the subsequent workers are approved .. I of course will put the promised time into BitShares .. the other "job" is also just a freelancing just for about 20h/week (at most) .. and I do have quite some things on my list to do .. not just coding and docs

A lot of people trust BM and for good reason.  He's the inventor of BTS and if anyone wants it to succeed it is him.  People see that and set BM as their proxy.  By saying you don't want BM to vote for you is like saying none of his other supporters (and probably your supporters) shouldn't vote for you either... I don't see the logic in your request to not have BM or any of his proxies vote for you.  Your basically asking for everyone who is anti dilution to change there minds and vote for you.

307
Thanks

That "stable income" is however not going to bring much value to BitShares ..

Congrats on getting a job.

I don't quite get why you are posting all this stuff though... As far as I can tell all your workers got voted in and you set the pay.  If you wanted more pay, why didn't you ask for more?  You kind of sound like the guy who quits or gets fired and says "That company is screwed without me, I'm irreplaceable!" . Life does go on and so will bitshares.  Whether your working for it or not.

308
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: February 24, 2016, 04:06:10 am »
localhost sent 5,000,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
4 hours ago

Literally every time I see these posts it reminds me of a major flaw of bitshares and makes me want to sell it.

But go ahead you guys, keep posting this every time anyone with a decent amount of BTS sends soem to poloniex.

Exactly!

Btw localhost is probably enjoying this transfer, anyone in the future that transfers so many bts in an exchange without stealth will be viewed with distrust.

It is natural for investors/speculators to be interested in any bts buying and selling activities by major shareholders.  This happens to the real world stock trading too.  Let's take it in stride.

Agree... Insiders have to report their transactions in their companies stocks.  Whether its right or wrong is debatable, but it is commonplace in the investment world.  It does help level the playing field for the common investor who doesn't have real time access to privileged company knowledge.

Also large stock holders must report position activity regardless of whether or not they are an insider.  This is to used to prevent manipulation by whales.  Not all the SEC rules are rigged against retail traders.

309
General Discussion / Re: Subsidizing Market Liquidity
« on: February 20, 2016, 08:38:36 am »
Another question to ask is why CNX, who charges market rates for even minor bug fixes, is doing this for free?

It would be better to discover the motive now, instead of 3 months after the hardfork while everyone is pissed.

310
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: February 19, 2016, 05:08:30 pm »
It's probably Brian Page...

311
Mumble is still asking for a certificate and rejecting entry into the room... 2nd week in a row mumble isn't working for me and I'm guessing many others... glad to see this is being back burnered even after it messed up the Roger Ver hangout.

Users need certificates instead of passwords according to the wiki, have you tried making a new account or using it as a new user? Maybe it's something wrong with your certificate and if you enter as a different user you can get it right

https://wiki.mumble.info/wiki/Mumble_Certificates

Thanks Akado, I didn't know that changed.

I ended up having to go into the plumble settings and generated a new certificate.  That seemed to work.

312
Mumble is still asking for a certificate and rejecting entry into the room... 2nd week in a row mumble isn't working for me and I'm guessing many others... glad to see this is being back burnered even after it messed up the Roger Ver hangout.

313
irrespective of if its back or not we should know why this happened and we should find ways this not to happen again and have alternatives..this is one of our competitive advantage vs. external exchanges that no matter how many people trade or if the external exchanges are DDOS, the bts DEX always work!

Openledger is run on a centralized server controlled by ccedk. From what I hear they have been having overheating issues. There was nothing wrong with the actual bts dex.  Openledger is just a website that hosts a wallet that accesses the dex.  Run the light wallet and you don't have to worry about what is happening at OL.

314
General Discussion / Re: Time to kill the Graphene name.
« on: February 18, 2016, 07:37:51 pm »
Graphene is the toolkit behind bitshares... Graphene != bitshares.

Other chains use the Graphene toolkit like identabit and muse.

315
prices of the cryptocoins by nature are very volatile. This is the reason why we should use stable bitAssets as payment for workers: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21449.msg278949.html#msg278949

Every worker should get exactly this amount of money which he need to provide a good service. For USA citizen this will be X bitUSD, for Chinese citizen this will be Y bitCNY.

The reserve fund needs to hold an assortment of bitassets.  It reduces the reserve fund risk and allows developers to be paid in their preferred currency.  It also promotes the entire BTS ecosystem, instead of just the bts token.

The reserve fund should act like sovereign wealth fund.  Constantly rebalancing it's holdings.  For starters, the reserve fund should hold 70% bts and split the other 30% between bitUSD, bitCNY, bitEUR bitBTC and bitGLD.  This would promote 5 bts currencies and improve liquidity while attracting dev's who may not want to get paid in a constantly fluctuating asset.  Fluctuating assets are nightmares to report for taxes.
You mean dump 30% of reserve fund to the market? It's about 300M. I don't even believe there are so many bit assets exist.

I never said dump... If a sovereign wealth fund wants to change allocations, they don't go and buy or sell the entire position over the next trading period.  It's is done over a period of months in order to make the transition smooth and not generate weird price distortions.

Right now the reserve fund is in an extremely risky scenario. Remember, apple doesn't hold its reserves in apple stocks. Governments don't hold all their reserves in their national bonds.  It's prudent to diversify, not to mention promotion of the bts ecosystem.

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 80