Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pheonike

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 65
766
BitShares PTS / Re: Nivida miner program for yPool or other pool
« on: November 14, 2014, 12:19:55 am »
I was using cuda.exe but ccminer. yPool doesn't accept stratum for PTS. MY GPU is in my windows 8 machine which is also running 32bit. It's a 750ti.

767
BitShares PTS / Nivida miner program for yPool or other pool
« on: November 13, 2014, 11:43:10 pm »
What's best miner prg for an nvidia card? Trying to connect to yPool with Cuda and ccminer, but can't get the script working.

768
General Discussion / Re: Dcoker and CoreOS
« on: November 13, 2014, 09:52:17 pm »
Has anyone got the Bitshares Docker running? I have it on my windows machines but keeps closing the wallet after adding peers. How do I copy jsons files? Im still learning Docker but it pretty cool.

769
General Discussion / Re: Invictus Innovations to Return PTS Donations
« on: November 13, 2014, 05:35:24 pm »
Because time is a factor most of the time. It would great for them to layout the case every time, let everyone debate then come to a conclusion. But sometimes their isn't enough time to do that. Also, it can be informative to see what conclusion ppl come to when they don't have all the facts. There are legal and economic reasons why some things can't be disclosed in a public forum. As has been mentioned before, there are alot of ppl who view this forum that don't have BitShares interest at heart. I don't expect every decision they make to be perfect, but I do believe they have everyone interest in mind as best as be be possible and when a mistakes do happen the are flexible enough to recognise them make solutions.

770
General Discussion / Re: Invictus Innovations to Return PTS Donations
« on: November 12, 2014, 11:29:08 pm »
Quote from: Whatsgoingon on November 12, 2014, 11:26:40 pm
Hello

Wasn't there a PTS snapshot on November 5th?
So Invictus has kept the PTS, snagged the snapshot and now gives back the PTS to avoid legal issues?

First Invictus establishes PTS
Then Angelshares can be acquired by donating PTS
Invictus can conveniently donate their own PTS to themselves as nobody can prove otherwise
BTSX are derived from Angelshares
Invictus makes PTS snapshot and reaps all the profit from the self donated (and artificially increased third-part donations) PTS
Invictus returns PTS to avoid legal issues

Through this process Invictus continuously washes dirty profit and artificially increases value for the individual product and thereby draws in unsuspecting donators/ investors.

Please, when will be the next snapshot and what new product will you create by donating to yourself with a product you created previously?

just as i said earlier....

771
General Discussion / Re: Invictus Innovations to Return PTS Donations
« on: November 12, 2014, 11:17:37 pm »

so glad you guys are on are side! :)

772
General Discussion / Re: Invictus Innovations to Return PTS Donations
« on: November 12, 2014, 10:00:44 pm »
You can never satisfy everyone in this community. I'm sure someone is going find something negative about this.  ::)

773
General Discussion / Re: Dcoker and CoreOS
« on: November 12, 2014, 12:15:55 am »
 +5%

774
General Discussion / Dcoker and CoreOS
« on: November 12, 2014, 12:12:57 am »
Any talk of porting BitShares client to Docker?

https://www.docker.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzQfxoMFH0U




775
General Discussion / Re: [MetaExchange] 100% pay-rate delegate, raising funds for registration
« on: November 11, 2014, 11:41:42 pm »

If we want to to get 3rd party onramps on board faster then we gotta give them the some incentives. Would suggest splitting the yield 50/50 with the site and the user.

776
General Discussion / Re: AGS to be allocated 10% in PLAY Dac.
« on: November 11, 2014, 09:57:29 pm »

If all the energy being used to figure a percent here or there was used to further the project, we would already be much farther along. I still don't understand why PTS ppl feel they took more risk therefore deserve more. The got a pierce of future DACS and could still recoup some investment by selling their PTS. If you had confidence in the project you would have bought AGS or BTSX directly. You got a piece of everything and can still recoup from PTS liquidity. It may not be worth as much, but that's gamble you took.

777
DAC PLAY / Re: Official Announcement for BitShares PLAY Allocation
« on: November 11, 2014, 06:41:00 pm »

Spelled platform wrong on the bitsharesplayfoundation.org site.   Under the Draw the Future Section.

778
General Discussion / Re: Beyond Bitcoin: "Seize and reallocate your shares"?!
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:20:22 am »


We are not bowing down, we are trying to avaoid any unnecessary contact.  We are not trying to follow the rules, we are to avoid them. Which not the same as breaking them.

779
General Discussion / Re: How to measure marketing effort effectiveness and public facing traffic stats...
« on: November 10, 2014, 11:10:16 pm »
 +5%

780
General Discussion / Re: Long live the social consensus, long live PTS! (Stay tuned)
« on: November 10, 2014, 02:16:49 am »
The purpose pts was for pow miners who didn't want to buy into btsx with btc. If pts is dpos then ppl will just buy pts. If you gonna buy somehing then just buy bts.

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 65

Page created in 0.175 seconds with 20 queries.