Hey super3, time for the feedback:

1) Never use the work Corporation with DACs... use Company instead for legal reasons.
2) What is a DAC? page should not use our 1990ish graphics
3) List of Official Invictus Innovation DACs should not inlcude Memory Coin
4) I don't like the "Funding" vocabulary and it misses the synergy between AGS and PTS by having them on separate menu items.
5) Coins, Software, and DACs menu just seems way too many disjoint ideas in one menu... we don't do coins!
6) Still way too much MMC all over the site.   Design the site without MMC and then we will add a SINGLE link to it in the right spot.
7) No News site
No explanation AT ALL about BitShares... sorry but BitShares is our #1 draw and why people are buying PTS / AGS. 
9) Not extensible to adding new DACs... no DAC summary page with 'statistics' like I outlined in my example.
10) Don't mention my mining pool, it isn't operational anymore.

It is pretty, certainly better than our current site when it comes to first impressions, but far from complete.

Isn't it better for you to have 'backend' access so you can word it as you wish.  When we make sites for our clients, we word it anyway and later simply give ui and pass for our clients to insert what they want?

Can more ID's be registered at this point within the app?  Sorry if this was asked already.

Errm, is it too late to change the ID?  (gulp).  I believe Keyhotee will be here to stay and I think my family name should be there rather than my internet name...

Have I won?  eh eh eh?

Quote from: NineLives on December 15, 2013, 12:42:10 am

Nice read but I don't understand.  Its a bit above me but, are you saying that Bitcoin will eventually be controlled by governments in a country some day no matter what?  I may not have understood.

I am saying that Proof-of-Work based upon consumption cannot achieve decentralization.  I am also saying that the current Bitcoin ecosystem is rather corrupt and while existing players are acting in a benevolent manner, we are ultimately at their mercy and thus living under a dictatorship without any checks and balances built into the protocol.  Two players could effectively enforce that tainted coins could not be transferred. 

Bottom line, proof-of-work in this form is incompatible with Invictus' goal of decentralization.

I understand.

The everyday user (like me) see bitcoin as a way to earn quickly and with huge profits.  Bitshares has a challenge on its hands if we are going to compete or play along side?  Yes it isn't totally decentralized so for it to work with Invictus, what do you purpose?

That looks awesome dude..

Hi guys,

I'm willing to sell a BRAND NEW (UNBOXED) Playstation 4 Killzone Edition that comes with 2 pads, 1 camera and the console plus of-course the game Killzone for PTS.

This is a open bid so go ahead and place your offers here.

PS.  I am in the UK and willing to send anywhere providing postage is paid as a separate PTS fee.

Escrow is welcome and so is collection in person if you wish



PSS.  My feet are not included