Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tonyk

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 221
121
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 11, 2016, 08:11:56 am »
trust sent 8,376,521 BTS to poloniexwallet
8 hours ago
trust sent 4,213,283 BTS to poloniexwallet
12 hours ago
trust sent 3,235,842 BTS to poloniexwallet
17 hours ago
trust sent 2,000,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
1 day ago

yes if BTS (aka trust) has not discovered the self funding self f*ing blockchain innovation, we would be at 2100-2300 sat right now...

We might still eventual get there, but man that is pretty stupid move.

122
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 11, 2016, 05:25:02 am »
I decide to shoot for uniqueness / originality with this post... ;)


but last chances to ever claim "you bought bts in 1700 satoshi" range...

123
But I'm not sure what you mean by leftmost-rightmost.. is this close? https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD
yep. exactly what I meant.

124
New asset pages!
https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD
https://cryptofresh.com/a/MKR_OPEN.BTC

Feedback is appreciated, especially from a trader's perspective.. Any units to flip? Any obvious missing data?

+ 1; + 1; + 1; + 1; + 1; + 1;
wow you a such a great dev...what was this ( not wise) movie business sidestep ::)

PS
I really hate giving this kind of suggestions (as they are personal preference more than anything else), but move the price to the leftmost(rightmost) column.

125
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 10, 2016, 10:40:52 pm »
Always some idiot whale who doesnt realize he can easily sell the bts slowly over time at 2000+, he has to market dump to 1600 to try to kill bts while he gets out with less money.

Wasn't that little dump possibly the case of longs being under-margined and a big buy order being removed resulting in forced liquidations as you explained here?

Lets say that the person with the buy wall at 850 sats in our example cancelled his order.  Now, polo recalculates how much you could sell your BTS for. Lets say that the 850 wall was a big wall and you were relying on its existence.  Without it, poloniex sees that you would have to dump all the way down to 400 sats in a liquidation!   It recalculates your margin and determines that you are below the 20% liquidation level and are no longer safe. Therefore it autoliquidates your position, and crashes the price to 400 sats.
So the removal of an order from the books on polo can trigger forced liquidations.

I will agree with Ander and whoever else posted regarding this... being margin long (and short for that matter) is a very dangerous proposition with moves of that magnitude.

126
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 10, 2016, 10:04:20 pm »
How secure is Poloniex?  They have a lot of BTC and BTS there, would be a shame if something happened...

The precise moment I read this comment I pictured you like this


I thought the same thing, but I was thinking more a mob boss.

man, I wish someone has come up with un idea where all BTS (or dShares) are always in the DEX... ;)

127
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 10, 2016, 07:05:21 pm »
Wow this is some serious FOMO.

No shares available to lend, demand for several hundred thousand bts at 2%.  Shorts getting crushed.

should I feed them several mil BTS to see even more of them crushed?
Honest question. Cannot make my mind.

128
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 10, 2016, 06:44:15 pm »
money for development is good.
boy I hope BM did not sell in the hours after he moved his funds to polo...would be sad. kind of like our favorite 500 sat whale.

129
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 10, 2016, 02:15:04 am »
 483.98967728 BTC buy side order book....

I do not think I have seen this? since... ever?

130
Reserved!.... to say I like it  :)!
Read it. I like it!

How about using it "that much power" for this: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21824.msg284411/topicseen.html#msg284411

just in case some day in the future more than 2 people trade on the dex at the same time...currently it is only cylonmaker2053 and j2328 ...both having a blast of orders and cancellations...but still 2 traders only.

131
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 09, 2016, 12:51:53 am »
people with more 'insider knowledge' than you or me tend to agree with you...

all those "weird name-weird name" accounts voting for xeroc as of late, send substantial amounts to polo on every price rise...I sincerely doubt they do it to go margin long...
Who are they?
https://cryptofresh.com/u/dadossi-chandra

I have no clue..but I am running with your speculation that it is either BM or some developers paid by him.... it just seems the most logical thing I have read or come up with myself.
(other explanations/speculations welcomed)

It isn't me and I don't know who they are.

if you say so.

...it is either BM or some developers paid by him.... it just seems the most logical thing I have read or come up with myself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w47UQxld7LM&feature=youtu.be&t=2m12s

Pay attention guys. How many of you effectively stealthed their v0.x accounts, and imported only balances(and probably from just a few but not all of their balance keys) and did NOT imports v1 names into bts 2.0? How many of you none bts devs can actually do that?

wish the script was made available to the common folks, but then again onceupon might have not been as eager to pay for stealth gui...


132
General Discussion / What are BTCPLUS, COMPUCEEDS ?
« on: March 08, 2016, 05:32:24 am »
as per title

?

133
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 08, 2016, 01:32:28 am »
people with more 'insider knowledge' than you or me tend to agree with you...

all those "weird name-weird name" accounts voting for xeroc as of late, send substantial amounts to polo on every price rise...I sincerely doubt they do it to go margin long...
Who are they?
https://cryptofresh.com/u/dadossi-chandra

I have no clue..but I am running with your speculation that it is either BM or some developers paid by him.... it just seems the most logical thing I have read or come up with myself.
(other explanations/speculations welcomed)

134
Technical Support / Re: How to sieze my assets from not my account?
« on: March 07, 2016, 06:48:44 am »
There is a special operation called overwrite_transfer that does the trick (instead of transfer) .. but it has not yet been integrated into the GUI

well this one is way to obvious...someone can even guess it correctly...way too simple per bts standards. after all we are "re-imagine everything!"

when reserve_asset stands for burn_asset...

Asset Seizing should be called?... send_roses  as a bare minimum.


135
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 07, 2016, 03:44:00 am »
Well that was a fun pump... They are getting shorter and smaller each time.

We're still decently up right now...y'all are way too negative and price sensitive. Just let the market do its thang.

The way the price has been acting over the last several months is not bullish at all.  It's consistently leading to lower highs with a floor that continues to hold.  This is a descending triangle pattern and more often than not it leads to the floor breaking and price falling to fresh lows.

It would be much more bullish if BTS could establish a higher high, say 17 or 18 mil, and then fall back and retest an older high.

The market is doing it's "thang" and its saying lower (probably around 5 million) is very possible in the next few months.

people with more 'insider knowledge' than you or me tend to agree with you...

all those "weird name-weird name" accounts voting for xeroc as of late, send substantial amounts to polo on every price rise...I sincerely doubt they do it to go margin long...

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 221