Could you explain by what metric this approach has failed?
User base, adoption, trading volume, blockchainactivity, BTS price
Additional DEXbot has brought tons of liquidity.
I did not say every worker was bad, but I see a lot of space left by prioritizing and doing more user orientated work.
Additional DEXbot has brought tons of liquidity.
Nothing against DEXbot they started from 0 and they have now a working product.
Please tell the community what makes you think your criticism is justified
Things which needs improvement:
- Whitepaper
- Integration of decentralized services and hardware
-- PalmPay iOS version
-- bisq integration
-- trustless gateways
-- multi-collateral stable coins
--
shops accepting BTS with map--
localbitshares/escrow - new market mechanics
--
margin position liquidity pool-- improved price feeds
- UI with different flavors
-- beginner, advanced and commercal
- Liquidity
-- bitUSD/DAI trading pair
-- DEXbot
--- CEX/DEX arbitrage
-- OMO
- Marketing
When will investors come up with a vision? There have been 5 years now and I haven't seen any of them provide that.
Things can change and improve! BTS is a new asset class, good things take time.
How would you come from vision to mission in a decentralized ecosystem like ours. Who decides what should be part of the mission, or do you support multiple missions in parallel?
Personal ideas, other proxies, community feedback and worker polls